1 / 20

Factors affecting ANALY_MWT2 performance

Factors affecting ANALY_MWT2 performance. MWT2 team August 28, 2012. Factors to check. Storage servers Internal UC network Internal IU network WAN network Effect of dCache -locality caching versus WAN direct access IU analysis nodes specifically. Individual storage servers.

afric
Download Presentation

Factors affecting ANALY_MWT2 performance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Factors affecting ANALY_MWT2 performance MWT2 team August 28, 2012

  2. Factors to check • Storage servers • Internal UC network • Internal IU network • WAN network • Effect of dCache-locality caching versus WAN direct access • IU analysis nodes specifically

  3. Individual storage servers • We have previously measured performance of each storage node individually with various “blessing tests” • Nodes are uct2-s[14] and iut2-s[6] • Note xxt2-s[3] are first gen; xxt2-s[4-14] are SAS2 H800 • Each storage node is over-provisioned for CPU and memory (96G) – even while running dCache services and Xrootd-overlay • Each node has a single 10G NIC, a potential bottleneck • Some of the s-nodes have an additional 10G port that could be cabled and bonded • Currently only UC and IU have storage and since all accesses are local no analysis jobs run at UIUC presently • UIUC will add 300TB this fall

  4. Typical Storage node

  5. Storage Network utilization at UC An hour sample. See IO nicely spread over servers, noobvious bottlenecks or hot spots

  6. Storage Network utilization UC (week) Over past week. More less the same- good spread, 100-300 MB/s continuously per system

  7. UC Network This link is now 2x10G

  8. UC Network – Bottlenecks (1) • PC8024F and PC6248 stack • Cacti (guest/cacti): http://www.mwt2.org/cacti/graph.php?action=view&local_graph_id=3581&rra_id=all • Last week. There are moments of saturation (3)

  9. UC Network (2) • PC6248 and Cisco 6509 is 2x10G bonded • http://www.mwt2.org/cacti/graph.php?action=view&local_graph_id=3757&rra_id=all • Last week (looks fine mostly < single 10G)

  10. WAN network from UC to IU, UIUC, and BNL

  11. WAN Network Last week’s IO to UC: green is usually FTS transfers from BNL, blue IO mostly to IU but some to UIUC. This is for one of the 10G NICs from the 6509 to campus core (there is a second NIC to campus core, and the bonded plot, neither of which I can findin our cacti hierarchy at the moment)

  12. Local network @ IU MWT2

  13. IU local network • Storage nodes are each connected via 10GB link to 6248 switch stack • Compute nodes are connected to the same stack via 1GB connections • 6248 switch has dual-10GB uplink to rtsw2, the 100GB Brocade switch

  14. IU-centric WAN picture This picture does not show connectivity to the other MWT2 sites; to UC, the connection is through MREN currently

  15. IU WAN network • WAN traffic last month (peaks up to 8 Gbps) There are 100 Gbps links to Chicago available – though not all the way to UIUC and UC

  16. WAN direct access versus dCache-locality mode caching • We believe since turning on dCache-caching we have reduced the load on the WAN dCache-locality was turned circa 8/6/2012 (~ Week 31)

  17. dCache locality mode • Cache hit rate is about 75% • Individual files are used an average of 4 times • The average transfer transfer reads 25% of the file

  18. dCache Site Caches Cached data IU pools UC pools

  19. Low efficiency at IU • Slow jobs are not associated with a particular data server • According to strace, most system time is spent in munmap command • Jobs are slow even on a completely empty node • Data is cached at IU

  20. Summary and improvements • Add second 10G to 8024F-6248 link at UC and bond • Cable up second 10G port for uct2-s[11-14] • will need to add another 8024F, which will also require further trunking rearrangement • Adding additional storage nodes will increase number of IO channels decreasing single-node contention

More Related