1 / 32

A Presentation at the 2013 QRIS National Meeting

Explore tools & strategies to address disparities & promote diversity in early childhood education. Presentation findings highlight challenges & ways to foster inclusive environments.

agee
Download Presentation

A Presentation at the 2013 QRIS National Meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Tools and Strategies for Building SystemsThat Support Young Children Who Are Culturally and Linguistically Diverse A Presentation at the 2013 QRIS National Meeting

  2. Who’s here? What perspective(s) do you bring to our conversation? PD provider (training, technical assistance, higher education) Administrator Other?

  3. Findings There are significant disparities in the education, economic well-being, and health of children in the U.S. based on their race-ethnicity and whether or not their parents are immigrants 1 When it comes to education, all groups of U.S. children were found to be at risk, regardless of their race-ethnicity and whether their parents were born in the U.S. Rates of reading and math proficiency were critically low across the board; the lowest rates were for Hispanic and black children.

  4. Before entering kindergarten, the average cognitive scores of preschool-age children in the highest socio-economic group are 60% above the average scores of children in the lowest socioeconomic group.2 Disparities in child outcomes between poor, at-risk, and more advantaged children are evident in cognitive, social, behavioral, and health outcomes as early as 9 months and grow larger by 24 months of age.3

  5. Nearly seven out of every 1,000 pre-kindergarteners are expelled each year—an estimated 5,117 preschoolers in all. The rate is 3.2 times higher than the national expulsion rate for children in grades K-12.4 Boys are expelled 4.5 times more than girls; and African-Americans are twice as likely to be expelled as Latino and Caucasian kids and more than five times as likely asAsian-American kids.4

  6. Dual language learners are heavily overrepresented among low-achieving students (within the bottom 5% – 25% of the achievement distribution) and severely underrepresented among high achievers (within the top 5% - 25% of the achievement distribution).5

  7. Children form academic trajectories early in their school careers that tend to be stable and difficult to change over the course of their schooling 6 Children’s negative perceptions of competence and attitudes become stronger and harder to reverse as children progress through school 7

  8. Examine Professional Development Research suggests that both preservice and inserviceEC teacher preparation have failed to prepare educators who can effectively teach children for whom English is a new language or second dialect, children of color, children of diverse abilities, and children from economically marginalized communities 8 )

  9. A recent study revealed that few states include measures of cultural or linguistic competency of child care programs in their QRIS and these measures sometimes only apply to programs at the highest quality rating.9

  10. Perspectives from Round 1 RTT-ELC applications • Louise Stoney’s analysis of trends & challenges related to QRIS priorities addressed in the 35 state applications for RTT-ELC (2012) noted the “need for greater cultural competence and workforce diversity” as well as PD and supports in multiple languages. • Only one state was cited for focused attention to children with disabilities.10

  11. BUILD Diversity Learning TableMarch – August 2012

  12. Sample Diversity Learning Table Session

  13. Questions for Examining the Intentionality of Your Approaches

  14. Do your policies reflect your intentionality?

  15. What messages do your words convey? • Family as a broader term • Person first language (child with a disability instead of disabled child)

  16. New NAEYC Standards for Professional Preparation Programs 11 Significant Changes in the 2009 Standards The language all children is revised to read each child or every child to strengthen the integration of inclusion and diversity as threads across all standards. In some cases, the phrase “each child” has been added to a key element of a standard.

  17. Have you established policies related to cultural and linguistic diversity? • We believe that . . . • Learning about and respecting differences among people are promoted when children have many opportunities to play and interact with classmates of different racial and cultural backgrounds and varying abilities.

  18. Resources for Building Policies That Support Each Young Child

  19. Cultural/LinguisticResponsiveness Programs are responsible for creating a welcoming environment that respects diversity, support children’s ties to their families and communities, and promote both second language and preservation of children’s home languages and cultural identities. Linguistic and cultural diversity is an asset, not a deficit, for young children. 12

  20. Resources from

  21. Ask yourself... Do your efforts have an explicit and intentional emphasis on young children who are culturally diverse (includes racial, ethnic, socio-economic, and other aspects of diversity)? Do your efforts have an explicit and intentional emphasis on young children who are dual language learners? Do your efforts have an explicit and intentional emphasis on young children with disabilities and inclusion? Do you have agreed upon definitions of key terms to use in your work (e.g., cultural competence, inclusion)? Do you have guiding principles to underscore your shared commitment to families in all aspects of your work? Have they been developed collaboratively with families?

  22. Do your family engagement standards and efforts reflect your intentionality?

  23. Engage Families to Help Children Succeed • Higher preschool performance and promotion to next grade 13,14 • More positive engagement with peers, adults, and learning15 • Buffers negative impact of poverty on academic and behavioral outcomes16

  24. Effective Models of Family Engagement Emphasize a reciprocal relationship (not one-sided) Take a partnership approach to children’s learning, in which both programs and families collaborate Emphasize respect for families and a value for their expertise Promote two-way communication and co-planning

  25. How are your family engagement efforts growing the capacity of teacher to welcome and support each family? Recent research has found changes in teachers’ negative beliefs about Latino and other immigrant families after having direct contact and experiences with these families in their communities. 17

  26. Resources for Supporting Engagement of Each and Every Family

  27. Learning Table Session on Family Engagement

  28. Resources for Supporting Engagement for Each and Every Family

  29. Resources for Supporting Engagement for Each and Every Family

More Related