1 / 14

Project Implementation and Beneficiary Assessment(PIBA), 2008

photo. photo. Project Implementation and Beneficiary Assessment(PIBA), 2008. To assess the extent of realization of the RALAS objectives from the beneficiaries point of view.

aglaia
Download Presentation

Project Implementation and Beneficiary Assessment(PIBA), 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. photo photo Project Implementation and Beneficiary Assessment(PIBA), 2008

  2. To assess the extent of realization of the RALAS objectives from the beneficiaries point of view. • To study the contributions of RALAS in terms of project methodology, effectiveness and efficiency of implementation. Objectives of PIBA-2008

  3. To assess RALAS outputs in terms of: 1. Land Titling • Information Dissemination and Co-ordination with NGOs and CSOs • Titling Process • Social Inclusion and consideration of vulnerable groups • Community Perception and Satisfaction with the Systematic Titling Process 2. Land Management and Administration • Re-establishing and strengthening land administration and management systems. • Compliance with Safeguards and addressing Complaints, Land Disputes and their Resolution. • Governance Issues (including coordination with MDF/WB) 3. Project Implementation and Management Scope of Work

  4. In each study village: Interviewed the village leader Prepared a village profile Conducted Focus Group Discussions (FGD) with Farmers, Fisher folk and Women Interviewed project beneficiaries (semi-structured questionnaire) Methodology • A team of 8 researchers jointly funded by GOI and MDF/World Bank • Desk review of project documents • Randomly selected research sites • Three months of intensive field research in 37 village with 269 individual beneficiary interviews and 62 focus group discussions conducted, more than 700 total informants • In each study district : • Interviewed Land Office officials • District leaders • Sub-district leaders • Additionally interviewed: • Other local authorities • BPN and BRR officials • Project staff • NGOs/CSOs • Donors

  5. Aceh Province, Northern Sumatra, Indonesia PIBA Study Areas

  6. PIBA Research

  7. Key Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations

  8. Raised public awareness on land issues immediately after tsunami. • Supported land policy development. • Established long-term goals. In realizing the project objectives: • Modest contributions towards recovery of security of land tenure. • Moderate contributions towards recovery of land administration system Overall Contributions of RALAS

  9. Implementation of the land titling process and beneficiary satisfaction • High beneficiary satisfaction • Enhanced perception of legal protection of land rights. • Resolution of land disputes. • Reasonable accuracy land certificates produced. • Seen as an open and transparent, community-based process. Issues: Large unmet need and high demand. • Gender concerns were adequately covered in the project design, but not given sufficient focus during project implementation. • Women are under-represented in the village and local institutions. As a result, women’s land rights are easily overlooked or not taken seriously. • Until 2008, joint titling was not promoted and rarely done. • Barriers to women’s participation identified Gender Concerns

  10. Project Design and Safeguards • Early identification that land administration system key to reconstruction process. • Project design was appropriate to address complex needs. • Output targets reasonable and achievable. • No dispossession of land ownership found.

  11. Key Messages Acceptance and ownership of the CDA process • The Community-Driven Adjudication (CDA) approach has both local legitimacy and legal backing of the government. There is high public confidence in the land title certificates. • The process is seen as reinforcing traditional adat land rights • The restoration of land rights was seen as critical to supporting social stability and securing livelihoods. Appropriateness of the CDA model • The CDA approach is effective in securing land rights and reducing land conflicts in a post-disaster, post-conflict situation • The CDA Model is portable and replicable in a wide range of conditions.

  12. Policy and Institutional Development to support preparedness The restoration of land rights was seen as critical to supporting social stability and securing livelihoods. National Land Policy should include clear focus on disaster preparedness Land institutions should be prepared to respond to new and increasing demands (proactive approach) Building partnerships is the key to success (Gov – NGO – CSO – Donor – local authorities – communities) Data and proper data management /storage are critical speedy recovery Key Messages (2)

  13. Thank You - Terima kasih

More Related