1 / 28

Magnet Schools and Sheff vs. O’Neill

Magnet Schools and Sheff vs. O’Neill. Presentation for the Hartford Public Schools by Hambisa Goso, Erik Jefferson, Kerry Kincy, Chris Olenoski, and Sam Zivin, with Professor Jack Dougherty Trinity College, Hartford CT April 25, 2007.

agostino
Download Presentation

Magnet Schools and Sheff vs. O’Neill

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Magnet Schools and Sheff vs. O’Neill Presentation for the Hartford Public Schools by Hambisa Goso, Erik Jefferson, Kerry Kincy, Chris Olenoski, and Sam Zivin, with Professor Jack Dougherty Trinity College, Hartford CT April 25, 2007

  2. Part 1: Racial composition of magnet schools and Sheff settlement goals Part 2: Interviews with prospective parents at magnet school fairs

  3. According to the Sheff legal settlement of 2003, all parties agreed to a goal of 30% of Hartford minority students in desegregated school settings by June 2007

  4. 22 magnets currently open, 2006-07

  5. Are We Meeting the Sheff Goal? Source: CT State Dept. Ed

  6. Are We Meeting the Sheff Goal?

  7. Are We Meeting the Sheff Goal?

  8. Are We Meeting the Sheff Goal?

  9. Are We Meeting the Sheff Goal? *based on prior year Choice data

  10. Are We Meeting the Sheff Goal? *based on prior year Choice data Even if all magnet enrollments were counted, still would not reach 30% goal Project Choice enrollments have not risen to 1600, the projected level in 2003 settlement

  11. Are We Meeting the Sheff Goal? Progress toward the Sheff settlement goal of 30% by June 2007 *estimate

  12. Magnet School Fair Interviews

  13. Magnet School Fair Interviews Research Questions: 1) What motivates parents to consider magnet schools relative to other choices? 2) How do parents construct ideas about the purpose and quality of magnet schools? 3) What sources of information and social networks do these parents rely upon? 4) How do parental motivations, ideas, and networks vary across demographic groups?

  14. Magnet School Fair Interviews Research Methods: Interviews with 126 prospective magnet parents attending 3 HPS magnet fairs in January - February 2007

  15. Magnet School Fair Interviews Research Methods: Interviews with 126 prospective magnet parents attending 3 HPS magnet fairs in January - February 2007 Community partner Delores Bolton, HPS Assistant Supt for Magnet Schools

  16. Magnet School Fair Interviews Research Methods: Interviews with 126 prospective magnet parents attending 3 HPS magnet fairs in January - February 2007 Fair at Breakthrough Magnet School, January 2007

  17. Magnet School Fair Interviews Research Methods: Interviews with 126 prospective magnet parents attending 3 HPS magnet fairs in January - February 2007 Fair at Breakthrough Magnet School, January 2007

  18. Magnet School Fair Interviews Transcribed, coded, and analyzed interview data

  19. Magnet School Fair Interviews Demographic summary of parents in this sample *We did not interview every parent at the magnet fair, nor should this sample be generalized to the larger pool of all magnet applicants

  20. Claim 1: Race Does not Affect “Push” or “Pull” Motivations in this sample We coded parent motivations for considering a magnet school: • “push” away from current school • “pull” toward magnet school • both • neither

  21. Claim 1: Race Does not Affect “Push” or “Pull” Motivations in this sample We coded parent motivations for considering a magnet school: • “push” away from current school • “pull” toward magnet school • both • neither

  22. Claim 2: More parents motivated by educational opportunity than diversity in this sample • Regardless of race, magnet fair parents were more likely to mention educational opportunities as their motivation (39%, or 49 out of 126), compared to diversity (1%, or 6 out of 126) • Of the White parents, only 1 out of 24, acknowledged diversity as their motivation, in comparison to 5 out of 102 minority parents

  23. Claim 3: Urban Parents Rely More Upon Current Schools for Magnet Information than Suburban Parents • 34% (23/67) Urban parents rely on current schools • 21% (12/57) Suburban parents rely on current schools • Typical urban parent responses: • “I got a flyer from school” or “School counselor” • Suburban parents rely more upon social networks

  24. Claim 4: Several Parents Perceive Magnet Schools as Different from “Public” Schools • Typical parent: “I’m just trying to find an alternative to public school in Hartford” • The population lacks a clear vocabulary for two types of public schools: magnets and neighborhood schools

  25. Claim 4: Several Parents Perceive Magnet Schools as Different from “Public” Schools • Typical parent: “I’m just trying to find an alternative to public school in Hartford” • The population lacks a clear vocabulary for two types of public schools: magnets and neighborhood schools Some magnet school promotional literature contributes to this confusion by associating magnets with “private” schools

  26. Claim 5: Some Parents Concerned with Recently “Magnetized” Neighborhood Schools • HPS neighborhood schools recently converted into magnets: Kinsella, Hooker, Annie Fisher, Simpson-Waverly, Noah Webster • Typical parent comments: • “I don’t know what they are going to offer different”... • “When it was a troubled elementary school, [boom] it turned into a magnet school…”

  27. Members of the Ed 309 seminar at Trinity, Spring 2007 Back (L to R): Hambisa Goso, Heather Moore, Erik Jefferson, Chris Olenoski, Ernie Laden; Middle: Dora Turjan, Gloribel Gonzalez, Ashley Clackson, Jen Shouldice, Kerry Kincy, Sam Zivin; Front: Elysha Padilla, Mari Zigas, Jason Haber. Not pictured: Noelle Bessette and Professor Jack Dougherty

  28. Additional information available on the Cities, Suburbs, and Schools website www.trincoll.edu/depts/educ/CSS

More Related