1 / 30

Update on Q4

Update on Q4. DSM/IRFU/SACM. M. Segreti , J.M. Rifflet 3 July 2013. The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme, Grant Agreement 284404.

aiko
Download Presentation

Update on Q4

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Update on Q4 DSM/IRFU/SACM M. Segreti, J.M. Rifflet 3 July 2013 The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme, Grant Agreement 284404.

  2. Magnetic designs (90 mm aperture with one layer of MQ cable) using: • the classical cable insulation • the new porous EI#4 insulation scheme • Mechanical comparison of results obtained with the two schemes of cable insulation • Random field error analysis • Effect on harmonics of heat exchanger position (in the iron yoke) • Coil end design & optimisation • Protection (brief results)

  3. Magnetic designs (90 mm aperture with one layer of MQ cable) using: • the classical cable insulation • the new porous EI#4 insulation scheme • Mechanical comparison of results obtained with the two schemes of cable insulation • Random field error analysis • Effect on harmonics of heat exchanger position (in the iron yoke) • Coil end design & optimisation • Protection (brief results)

  4. New porous cable insulation scheme (radial = 0.16 mm; azimuthal = 0.145 mm) Classical MQ insulation thicknesses(radial = 0.13 mm; azimuthal = 0.110 mm) 3 blocks (7-5-2 conductors) HX hole at 101 mm of the magnet center Inom = 16188 A; Collar µr = 1.003 3 blocks (8-4-2 conductors) HX hole at 95 mm from the magnet center Inom = 16050 A; Collar µr = 1.003 Harmonics were not optimized after having added the collar

  5. Magnetic designs (90 mm aperture with one layer of MQ cable) using: • the classical cable insulation • the new porous EI#4 insulation scheme • Mechanical comparison of results obtained with the two schemes of cable insulation • Random field error analysis • Effect on harmonics of heat exchanger position (in the iron yoke) • Coil end design & optimisation • Protection (brief results)

  6. Thermo-mechanical properties Due to the cable insulation creep after the collaring process, it is also assumed 20 % and 30 % losses of pre-stress in conductor blocks using the classic MQ and the new porous EI#4 insulation schemes, respectively

  7. Mechanical results with MQ cable using the classical MQ insulation (Insulation thickness: radial = 0.13 mm azimuthal = 0.11 mm)

  8. Coil azimuthal stress distribution (MPa) After collaring θ max = - 104 MPa θ mean = - 67 MPa At 2 K θ max = - 52 MPa θ mean = - 40 MPa At 110 % of Inom θ max = - 63 MPa θ mean = - 41 MPa

  9. Coil Von Mises stress distribution (MPa) After collaring VM max = 93 MPa At 2 K VM max = 51 MPa At 110 % of Inom VM max = 61 MPa

  10. Coil displacement due to Lorentz forces at 110 % of Inom(µm) Coil azimuthal displacement δθ max = 17 µm toward mid-plane Coil radial displacement δr max = 27 µm toward outer radius

  11. Mechanical results with MQ cable using the new porous EI#4 insulation (Insulation thickness: radial = 0.16 mm azimuthal = 0.145 mm)

  12. Coil azimuthal stress distribution (MPa) After collaring θ max = - 132 MPa θ mean = - 84 MPa At 2 K θ max = - 63 MPa θ mean = - 48 MPa At 110 % of Inom θ max = - 72 MPa θ mean = - 49 MPa

  13. Coil Von Mises stress distribution (MPa) After collaring VM max = 118 MPa At 2 K VM max = 62 MPa At 110 % of Inom VM max = 70 MPa

  14. Coil displacement due to Lorentz forces at 110 % of Inom(µm) Coil azimuthal displacement δθ max = 33 µm toward mid-plane Coil radial displacement δr max = 42 µm toward outer radius

  15. Summary of the main results at each step

  16. Magnetic designs (90 mm aperture with one layer of MQ cable) using: • the classical cable insulation • the new porous EI#4 insulation scheme • Mechanical comparison of results obtained with the two schemes of cable insulation • Random field error analysis • Effect on harmonics of heat exchanger position (in the iron yoke) • Coil end design & optimisation • Protection (brief results)

  17. geometric errors in the 24 blocks (inputs for the 500 ROXIE calculations) We do also for rms of 10, 20, 30, 40 and 50 µm For quadrupole magnet, the standard deviation of the normalized multipoles can be described by a power law σ(an,bn) = dαβn

  18. Random in the 24 blocks of one of the double 90 mm aperture, R ref = 30 mm, I = 16188 A, with symetric yoke, with 0.003 shrinkage, to compare with operating measurements Random in the 24 blocks of the single 90 mm aperture, R ref = 30 mm, I = 1000 A, without yoke, without shrinkage, to compare with warm measurements

  19. Thanks to Qingjin Xu and Xiaorong Wang for their help!

  20. Magnetic designs (90 mm aperture with one layer of MQ cable) using: • the classical cable insulation • the new porous EI#4 insulation scheme • Mechanical comparison of results obtained with the two schemes of cable insulation • Random field error analysis • Effect on harmonics of heat exchanger position (in the iron yoke) • Coil end design & optimisation • Protection (brief results)

  21. b3 can be minimized by adapting the vertical position of the HX hole without changing the position of the conductor blocks i.e. the coil geometry  the final HX size can be decided later

  22. Magnetic designs (90 mm aperture with one layer of MQ cable) using: • the classical cable insulation • the new porous EI#4 insulation scheme • Mechanical comparison of results obtained with the two schemes of cable insulation • Random field error analysis • Effect on harmonics of heat exchanger position (in the iron yoke) • Coil end design & optimisation • Protection (brief results)

  23. Main goal of the coil end optimization : • The minimization of the mechanical stress on the cable i.e. minimization of the strain energy due to the winding process • The minimization of the integrated multipole coefficients along the coil end (this is harder to obtain with only one coil layer) • To limit the peak-field as possible if localized in coil ends to improve quench performance • Use of ROXIE to design and to optimize the coil ends • (3 D calculation and analysis take a lot of time)

  24. integrated multipole coefficients along the coil return end b6 b10

  25. Magnetic designs (90 mm aperture with one layer of MQ cable) using: • the classical cable insulation • the new porous EI#4 insulation scheme • Mechanical comparison of results obtained with the two schemes of cable insulation • Random field error analysis • Effect on harmonics of heat exchanger position (in the iron yoke) • Coil end design & optimisation • Protection (brief results)

  26. Case 1: results obtained without dump resistor and with 0.016s delay quench-heater Resultsobtainedfrom the protection software developped by P. Fazilleau

  27. Case 2: results obtained with a 49 mΩ dump resistor and without quench-heater Results obtained from the protection software developped by P. Fazilleau

  28. Case 3: results obtained with a 49 mΩ dump resistor and with 0.016s delay quench-heater Results obtained from the protection software developped by P. Fazilleau

More Related