320 likes | 555 Views
Dynamic Analysis of Fan Foundation Mahendra Madhavan. Potential Power Plant Problems Requiring Dynamic Analysis. Machinery Vibration Piping Vibration Heavy-load drops Tornado missile impact Dry cask accidents. Need for Vibration Analysis. Meet the vendor’s performance criteria
E N D
Dynamic Analysis of Fan Foundation Mahendra Madhavan
Potential Power Plant Problems Requiring Dynamic Analysis • Machinery Vibration • Piping Vibration • Heavy-load drops • Tornado missile impact • Dry cask accidents
Need for Vibration Analysis • Meet the vendor’s performance criteria • Industry guidelines or SCS standards • Operation / Maintenance • Vibration not generated or transmitted to other areas • Foundation is free from structural resonance • Vibration not annoying to people
Four basic components of Vibration • Mass (m) • Stiffness (k) • Damping (c) • Forcing Function (F)
How to quantify vibration components? • Mass from Machine and Foundation drawings • Stiffness and Damping from DYNA5 (pile-soil interaction) • Force from vendor or make an estimate F
Fan Foundation • Mat foundation (Soil supported) • Pile / Caisson foundations
Types of Analysis • Modal Analysis • Response Analysis
Forced vibration of a damped system Damping (c) Mass (m) Stiffness (k) DAF m: Mass of the system k: Stiffness of the systemDAF: Dynamic Amplification Factor ω: Operating frequency ωn: Natural frequency τ: Damping ratio
Vibration Acceptance Criteria (Commonly used) (Vendor’s requirement and SCS Standards) MODAL ANALYSIS • Natural freq away from ± 20% of operating freq • Bearing Housing disp ≤ 0.125 mils pk-pk for 1 oz of wheel unbalance at outer radius (Sensitivity check) • Shaft velocity ≤ 0.1 in/sec (balancing grade) • Dynamic stiffness of the foundation should be ≥ 11.987 x 106 lb/in per support. RESPONSE ANALYSIS
Wheel unbalance (Sensitivity check) F = m e ω2 e=50 in m = 1 oz. 1 oz of wheel unbalance ω = 2π f The resulting displacement measured at Bearing Housing ≤ 0.125 mils pk-pk f = 900 rpm Peak to Peak F = 72 lb
How to Prevent Vibration? • Trial sizing criteria • Single or two degree of freedom models • Detailed analysis using GTStrudl and Dyna5 • GTStrudl for modal analysis and estimating the natural frequency • Dyna5 is used to estimate soil-structure spring stiffness and damping
Foundation/Soil Dynamic Properties 6 Members = 6 DOF’s for stiffness and damping
Y Vibration Modes • Longitudinal Sliding (Translation in X) • Vertical (Translation in Y) • Lateral Sliding (Translation in Z) • Rocking (Rotation about X) • Yawing (Rotation about Y) • Pitching (Rotation about Z) X Z TYPICAL MODES OF CONCERN
Y X Z Isometric view
Vertical(Y Translation) Y X Z
Rocking(X Rotation) Y Z X
Yawing(Y Rotation) Y X Z
Pitching(Z Rotation) Y X Z
Recent Analyses • Wansley 1 and 2(Rock Foundation ) • Single DOF, Using Hand calc • Bowen 3 and 4(Pile Foundation over rock) • GTStrudl and Static pile stiffness • Bowen 1 and 2(Pile Foundation over rock) – changing soil properties (density, shear waves, poisson etc.) • GTStrudl and DYNA5
Vibration Testing • In-situ testing to measure vibration for acceptance • Use In-situ testing results to validate the math model
Thank you Questions ?