1 / 23

Update: Run1 vs Run2 CC inc & First look at Water-out/Water-in

Update: Run1 vs Run2 CC inc & First look at Water-out/Water-in. Erez Reinherz-Aronis and Rajarshi Das (w/ Walter Toki) May 9, 2011. Outlook. Samples and POTs Bunch structure Run1 vs Run2 Run 1: Data vs MCp4 Run 2: Data vs MCp4 MCp4: Run1 vs Run2 Data: Run1vs Run2 Water-out/Water-in

akando
Download Presentation

Update: Run1 vs Run2 CC inc & First look at Water-out/Water-in

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Update:Run1 vs Run2 CC inc &First look at Water-out/Water-in Erez Reinherz-Aronis and Rajarshi Das (w/ Walter Toki) May 9, 2011

  2. Outlook • Samples and POTs • Bunch structure • Run1 vs Run2 • Run 1: Data vs MCp4 • Run 2: Data vs MCp4 • MCp4: Run1 vs Run2 • Data: Run1vs Run2 • Water-out/Water-in • Data: Ratio Water-out/Water-in vs expectation

  3. Samples and POTs • DQ sample were used • CC Inclusive Selection: • Highest momentum negative charge track in a bunch • Begins in the P0D • (no TPC pulls cut)

  4. Bunch timing • Run2 has Double-Triple bunch structure • 1st = Run36; 2nd, 3rd = Run37/8 Run 2 Run2: Run 37→38 Run 36 Run 1 Run1: Run 31 → 34

  5. Run1 vs Run2Run 1: Data vs MCp4Run 2: Data vs MCp4MCp4: Run1 vs Run2Data: Run1vs Run2

  6. Run1 Data vs MCp4CC inc - X, Y, Cosθ, φ Normalized by POT

  7. Run1 Data vs MCp4Z, Neg Trk Momentum • Normalized by POT • Start position of Highest momentum Neg. Trk in the P0D • The dashed lines represent the water-target limits

  8. Run2 Data vs MCp4CC inc - X, Y, Cosθ, φ Normalized by POT

  9. Run2 Data vs MCp4Z, Neg Trk Momentum • Normalized by POT • Data/MCp4 = 8273/8521 = 0.97±0.02

  10. MCp4 Run1 vs Run2CC inc - X, Y, Cosθ, φ Run1 water Run2 water Normalized by POT

  11. Mcp4 Run1 vs Run2Z, Neg Trk Momentum • Normalized by POT • Run1/Run2 = 111955/108661 =1.030±0.004

  12. Data Run1 vs Run2CC inc - X, Y, Cosθ, φ Run1 water Run2 water Normalized by POT

  13. Data Run1 vs Run2Z, Neg Trk Momentum • Normalized by POT • Run1/Run2 = 6062/5673 =1.07±0.02

  14. Z distribution checks: XY Run1 water Run2 water Normalized by POT Beam position and direction X

  15. Water-out/Water-inData ratio vs expectation

  16. Samples and POTs • DQ sample were used

  17. Data CC inc: X, Y, Cosθ, φ Run1 Run2 water Run2 air Normalized by POT

  18. Data CC inc: Neg Trk Momentum • Run1 • Run2 water • Run2 air • Normalized by POT • Note: Run2 air is reconstructed as water • No TPC pull used

  19. Z position distributions Run1 3588 Run2 water 3358 Run2 air 2573 Run1/Run2 = 1.07±0.02 • Start position of Highest momentum Neg. Trk in the P0D • The dashed lines represent the water-target limits

  20. Water-out/Water-in ratio 0.94±0.09 0.70±0.02 0.94±0.05 • Water-target measured ration 0.70±0.02 • Expected ration from material list: 0.68 • Dashed lines are the water-target limits

  21. Summary • Run1 vs Run 2: • MCp4 Run1/Run2 ~3% higher • Data Run1/Run2 ~7% higher • Maybe there is some Z difference (within limit stat.) • Water-out/Water-in ratio measured 70 ± 2 % (expect 68 %) • Future plans: • Data/MC ratio vs P0Dules • MCp4 – study TPC pulls

  22. Update:Run1 vs Run2 CC inc &First look at Water-out/Water-in Erez Reinherz-Aronis and Rajarshi Das (w/ Walter Toki) May 9, 2011

  23. Backup • (General) ND280 Fiducial -1060 < X < 1008 [mm] -1085 < Y < 1110 [mm] -3190 < Z < 5000 [mm] • P0D Fiducial -1038 < X < 995 [mm] -1060 < Y < 1100 [mm] -3190 < Z < -980 [mm]

More Related