90 likes | 251 Views
Working Group 2 Climate information transfer to stakeholders. Roma, 9 July 2013. http://www.climrun.eu. Scope of the WG2 session. Overall process – the methodological key stages (WG1) Identification and selection of stakeholders (WG1) Communication with stakeholders (WG1)
E N D
Working Group 2Climate information transfer to stakeholders Roma, 9 July 2013 http://www.climrun.eu
Scope of the WG2 session • Overall process – the methodological key stages (WG1) • Identification and selection of stakeholders (WG1) • Communication with stakeholders (WG1) • Identification of needs (WG1) • Translation of needs (WG1 and WG2)* • Defining and producing products (WG2)* • Assessing and refining products (WG2 and WG1)* * It is proposed that the protocol should focus on the mechanisms themselves, whereas the specific needs and products from the case-studies should be discussed somewhat separately. Or provided as accompanying examples.
Translation of needs • What are the main difficulties to translate stakeholder needs? • (eg; difference of language ? needs of interpretation ? ) • How did we proceed to translate the needs (eg comprehensive review? Prioritization?) • Which tools did we use for the translation’ process ? Who should define and provide those tools? ( CET? SET? both ?) • What are the possible ways of improvements to better interact between SET and CET ?
Translation of needs Example of toolused to translate the needs Savoie Case study
Defining and producingproducts • How did the CET proceed to categorise the needs (observation/simulation) ? • Eg : 0 not possible to provide; 1 already available; 2 easy to provide; 3 able to provide, but with a lot of work • How the final products choice was made? • How did we proceed to distribute and organize the production between WP2 and WP3 ? • What were the main challenges in the production process? (eg database availability, lack of observational data, time of processing? Interaction between scientists? )
Defining and producingproducts • How we organized the first transfer of the products to SET? (supply of raw data? Processed and analyzed data ?) What could be improved? • How was the interaction with SET and Stakeholders during this production process?
Assessing and refining products • What methods did we use to assess and refine products? • Iterative consultation? Interviews? Workshops only? • What did we assess and how far have we been ? • Relevant of analysis, simulation and tools (background/form/language etc.): what works what do not works? • Usefulness of data produced to improve adaptation decision-making and to change SH perception? • Quality of interactions between climate experts and stakeholders • Dissemination and sustainability of the products
Assessing and refining products • Relevant presentation Not relevant Example on the relevance of the product’format (Savoie)
Assessing and refining products Reflexionconcerning the dissemination and sustainability of the product : Example of SST climateforecast in Tunisia • A user need • A good appropriation of the results • What possible way for sustain the link? • Capacity building at destination level (INM etc.) ? • Mediterranean network on climat services?