230 likes | 384 Views
airLED Status Quo Peer Review Workshop Wrap-up and Conclusions. POLITICAL BOARD: LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF PARTNER ORGANISATIONS. LP's PROJECT MANAGEMENT TEAM. STEERING GROUP: PARTNERS' PROJECT AND FINANCIAL MANAGERS. Transnational thematic expert workshops, peer reviews.
E N D
airLED Status Quo Peer Review Workshop Wrap-up and Conclusions
POLITICAL BOARD: LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF PARTNER ORGANISATIONS LP's PROJECT MANAGEMENT TEAM STEERING GROUP: PARTNERS' PROJECT AND FINANCIAL MANAGERS Transnational thematic expert workshops, peer reviews ASG: ASSESSMENT AND SUPPORT GROUP SI PL IT HU Gorenjska Cerklje LP Vecsés SAR RER Mazovia RDCB* RDCB* RDCB* RDCB* KTI IRM RDCB Manager RDCB Manager RDCB Manager RDCB Manager RDCB Manager assessment, thematic support, quality control
EU state-of-art Initial criteria for 'Airport City in CE' Region1:Status quo analysis Region2:Status quo analysis Region3:Status quo analysis Region4:Status quo analysis OPEN LIVING LAB ASG Toolkit with regional good practices based on Open Living Lab results • STRATEGY FOR ‘ AIRPORT CITY’ DEVELOPMENT • Finalcriteriafor ‘Airport Citiesin CE’ • Recommendationsforprogramming Integrated regional polycentric development plan Integrated regional polycentric development plan Integrated regional polycentric development plan Integrated regional polycentric development plan
EU state-of-art Initial criteria for 'Airport City in CE' OPEN LIVING LAB RDCB 1 (lead: local authority) RDCB 4 (lead: local authority) RDCB 2 (lead: local authority) RDCB 3 (lead: local authority) PEER REVIEW 1 RDCB meetings Local expert work (pillars) RDCB meetings Local expert work (pillars) RDCB meetings Local expertwork (pillars) RDCB meetings Local expert work (pillars) PEER REVIEW 2 PEER REVIEW 3 PEER REVIEW 4 Toolkit with regional good practices based on Open Living Lab results
Difficulties of SQFinding out details of airport management structureConflict of interest between regional development and airport development (what is good for the region not necessarily good for the airport)Relationship between datasets (and justification): no explanation in methodology why do we look for certain data and what are the relationships?
Difficulties of SQHow to get information on investments in the region?Proposal to extend the SQ with big infrastructure overview (and impact): networks between airports and between airports and region(s)Catchment area definition: more realistic if considered space-time than just spatial distance
Difficulties of SQInclude an overall regional vision into the SQ analysisShow (and analyse) stakeholder expectationsAnalyse sectoral trends (longer term), make estimations and predictions of changes (%). Look at historic data and extrapolate (scenarios?): passengers, cargo, tourism, economy (also population)
Difficulties of SQVisualize information: use graphics, map locations and connectionsProvide a view on the investment pipeline: Projects operating Projects under construction Projects planned permits zoning plans
What do we aim for?1. Analyse (compare) and disseminate information2. Evaluate and comment (strenghts, weaknesses): Create input for development plan3. Airport masterplan: does it follow municpal/regional plans, or it is in conflict?4. General image and vision Current and future
What do we aim for?Understand the links between: - airport economy - airport region economyWho needs the airport, who benefits from the airport and how can airport development strengthen the development of the regional economy?