1 / 33

Information Society Technologies Programme Accompanying Measures (IST-2001-32633)

Innovation in e-Learning Seminar. Sponsor. Information Society Technologies Programme Accompanying Measures (IST-2001-32633). Innovation in e-Learning Seminar. Objective. To disseminate, stimulate discussion and creative suggestions with regard to identified best practices in e-Learning.

akira
Download Presentation

Information Society Technologies Programme Accompanying Measures (IST-2001-32633)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Innovation in e-Learning Seminar Sponsor Information Society Technologies Programme Accompanying Measures (IST-2001-32633)

  2. Innovation in e-Learning Seminar Objective To disseminate, stimulate discussion and creative suggestions with regard to identified best practices in e-Learning

  3. Innovation in e-Learning Seminar Agenda 9:15 Introduction 9:30 Project Objectives and Applied Methodology 10:30 Break 10:45 Project Results – Case Studies 11:30 Roundtable Discussion 12:00 Lunch 13:15 Presentations and Input From Participants 15:15 Break 15:30 Next Steps 16:00 Closing Comments

  4. Innovation in e-Learning Seminar Project Objectives & Applied Methodology

  5. Project Objectives & Applied Methodology • Project Objectives • General Objective • Specific Objective • Applied Methodology • Identification of e-Learning Sites • Initial Evaluation • Structure • Applications • Final Evaluation • Learner Models • Soft Skills & Informal Learning • Communities of Learning • Dissemination Activities December 2002

  6. Project Objectives General Objective To stimulate creativity, and to enhance education and training systems for lifelong learning. (IST 2001 Key Action 3.2.1 – Self Learning for Work) December 2002

  7. Project Objectives Specific Objectives • To conduct a study on innovative structures and applications of e-Learning within the United States and Europe. • To foster innovative e-Learning development through dissemination of “best practice” innovative structures and applications. December 2002

  8. Applied Methodology Identification of e-Learning Sites e-Learning Sites: • Internet based learning that is focused on the delivery of content (text, audio, video, animation, simulation) in a training format. Description Reasoning Reflection December 2002

  9. Applied Methodology Identification of e-Learning Sites • Utilized the four leading search engines based on the Jupiter Media Matrix’s ratings for “audience reach”, 2002 (searchenginewatch.com). • Microsoft Network • Yahoo • Google • America Online Description Reasoning Reflection December 2002

  10. Applied Methodology Identification of e-Learning Sites • Conducted a search with the term “e-learning” and selected only sites with a focus on students as the end user. • About 50 sites identified Description Reasoning Reflection December 2002

  11. Applied Methodology Identification of e-Learning Sites • Search engines are the most common method for identifying Internet sites. Theme “Self-learning for work” - accessible existing sites. • Assumption: leading e-Learning sites have the knowledge to leverage search engine and directories to attract end users. • Assumption: the term “e-learning” is a universal term applied across Europe and the United States for Internet based learning. Description Reasoning Reflection December 2002

  12. Applied Methodology Identification of e-Learning Sites • Restricted search due to assumptions – the term “e-learning” and e-learning sites ability to leverage search engines. • Other options are also highly restricted such as surveys of members of relevant associations (European Distance Education Network – EDEN) that rely on a significant response rate. There is always a low interest for participating in evaluations! Description Reasoning Reflection December 2002

  13. Applied Methodology Identification of e-Learning Sites • Restricted search due to assumptions – the term “e-learning” and e-learning sites ability to leverage search engines. (Continued) • Possibly limited to English based sites – 6 % of the resulting sites were non English based. Description Reasoning Reflection December 2002

  14. Applied Methodology Identification of e-Learning Sites • Resulting sites represented a diversity of organisation structures (private for profit, associations, etc.) but no traditional universities. • A lack of university focus on the general public market. • Opportunity to transfer innovative activities to the traditional university sector – dissemination activities. Description Reasoning Reflection December 2002

  15. Applied Methodology Initial Evaluation • Identified a set of criteria to evaluate the sites’ structures and applications. • Evaluated the sites based on the set of criteria. • Identified the top 5 sites with regard to structures. • Identified the top 5 sites with regard to applications. • Identified the top 20 sites overall (structures / applications). Description Reasoning Reflection December 2002

  16. Applied Methodology Initial Evaluation • Analysis of structures accounted for 7 specific criteria: • Objectiveness of the Mission – clearly stated/understood • Unique Design and Structure of the Interface • Aesthetics of the Web site – draw interest and appealing • Usability and Navigation – user friendly Description Reasoning Reflection December 2002

  17. Applied Methodology Initial Evaluation • Analysis of structures accounted for 7 specific criteria (continued): • Adaptability to the Web – course content adapted or simply a written document • Appropriateness of the Course Structure – take into account subject (Accounting includes problem solving simulations) • Support Available – (contact information, call centre) Description Reasoning Reflection December 2002

  18. Applied Methodology Initial Evaluation • Analysis of applications accounted for 4 specific criteria: • Technological Characteristics –course specific (Audio, video, animation, whiteboards) • Degreeof Interaction with OtherStudents (Synchronous interaction via audio/video/chat, email) • Degree of Interaction with a Tutor (Synchronous interaction via audio/video/chat, email) • Pedagogical Tools –course specific (exercises, quizzes, simulations) Description Reasoning Reflection December 2002

  19. Applied Methodology Initial Evaluation • Previous works: • Previous studies within the e-learning field: LGUIDE – The e-Learning Experts • Thesis: “A Framework for Comparing Web-Based Learning Environments” Description Reasoning Reflection December 2002

  20. Applied Methodology Initial Evaluation • Subjective component to the evaluation, although limited. • Short list of criteria sources – a need to review the sources utilized with other existing sources – American Society for Training & Development, Expert Papers • Clear need to develop widely accepted criteria to assess e-Learning practices – DG Education & Culture “eLearning call for Proposals”, September 2002 Description Reasoning Reflection December 2002

  21. Applied Methodology - Recap December 2002

  22. Applied Methodology Final Evaluation • Evaluated the top 20 e-Learning sites with regard to the following 3 areas: • Learner Models – focus on flexible, personal models for learning. • Soft Skills and Informal Learning – focus on the development of soft skills (communication, teamwork, leadership, project management, etc) and applying informal learning. • Communities of Learning – focus on identifying and implementing virtual communities, individuals with similar learning needs, within and across organisational boundaries. Description Reasoning Reflection December 2002

  23. Applied Methodology Final Evaluation • Learner Models evaluation was based on 10 criteria: • Skills GapAnalysis – skill level evaluation prior to course • Tutor Availability • Student Flexibility – course scheduling, course navigation • Control of Screen Information – student level interface • Defined Objectives – course purpose, expected performance Description Reasoning Reflection December 2002

  24. Applied Methodology Final Evaluation • Learner Models evaluation was based on 10 criteria (continued): • Self Assessment – periodically preferred • Content Integration– audio, video, slide show, animation • Document Management – bibliography, e-books • Help Facilities – beyond a tutor such as links, help desk • Simple User Interface – user friendly, consistent interface Description Reasoning Reflection December 2002

  25. Applied Methodology Final Evaluation • Soft Skills and Informal Learning evaluation was based on 7 criteria: • Interaction Activity – promoted and actual interaction • Reward – recognition or reinforcement of accomplishments: diploma, certificate • Transfer – relate course to the student’s “real world” • Environment – positive environment, tolerance of errors, appropriate feedback Description Reasoning Reflection December 2002

  26. Applied Methodology Final Evaluation • Soft Skills and Informal Learning evaluation was based on 7 criteria (continued): • Communication Interactivity – level of interaction: student / student and student / instructor • Motivation – ability to motivate the student, justify the need to learn • Student Centred – ability to manage depth and scope of learning, schedule, contribution. Description Reasoning Reflection December 2002

  27. Applied Methodology Final Evaluation • Communities of Learning evaluation was based on 8 criteria: • Clearly Stated Purpose – establish a foundation for the community of learning • Experienced Moderators – ability to initiate and guide discussions • Registration System – to allow students to present themselves to the community and provide the community a structure Description Reasoning Reflection December 2002

  28. Applied Methodology Final Evaluation • Communities of Learning evaluation was based on 8 criteria (continued): • Synchronous Tools – allow real-time interaction (chat rooms, discussion boards, virtual meetings) • Asynchronous Tools – ability to initiate and guide discussions (e-mail, message posting on web forums) • Group Problem Solving – foster groups with objectives within the course structure Description Reasoning Reflection December 2002

  29. Applied Methodology Final Evaluation • Communities of Learning evaluation was based on 8 criteria (continued): • Scheduled Events – ability to increase student awareness of group activities on particular topics • Level of Interaction – final result: existence of actual communities with activity Description Reasoning Reflection December 2002

  30. Applied Methodology Final Evaluation • EC defined key topics of learning • Previous works: • Previous studies within the e-learning field: LGUIDE – The e-Learning Experts • Thesis: “A Framework for Comparing Web-Based Learning Environments” • Various articles and reports from “experts” Description Reasoning Reflection December 2002

  31. Applied Methodology Final Evaluation • Subjective component to the evaluation, although limited. • Short list of criteria sources – a need to review the sources utilized with other existing sources – American Society for Training & Development • Clear need to develop widely accepted criteria to assess e-Learning practices – DG Education & Culture “eLearning call for Proposals”, September 2002 Description Reasoning Reflection December 2002

  32. Applied Methodology Dissemination Activities • Letter of Interest to about 750 individuals involved/interested in Distance Learning • About 60 responses directly interested in the project findings • Seminar • E-mail final reports • Website: spi.pt/innoelearning December 2002

  33. Contacts Sociedade Portuguesa de Inovação Edf. Les Palaces Rua Júlio Dinis, 242 – Sala 208 4050-318 Porto, Portugal Tel: 351-22-6076400 Fax: 351-22-6099164 E-mail: markspinoglio@spi.pt www.spi.pt December 2002 Sociedade Portuguesa de Inovação

More Related