1 / 7

ISM WORKSHOP April 24-27, 2006 Albuquerque, NM

Feedback and Improvement Assessment Results and Path Forward Michael N. Worley Office of Nuclear Energy. ISM WORKSHOP April 24-27, 2006 Albuquerque, NM. F&I Assessment Results. Performance Objective – Contractor Program Documentation

alaqua
Download Presentation

ISM WORKSHOP April 24-27, 2006 Albuquerque, NM

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Feedback and Improvement Assessment Results and Path Forward Michael N. Worley Office of Nuclear Energy ISM WORKSHOPApril 24-27, 2006Albuquerque, NM

  2. F&I Assessment Results Performance Objective – Contractor Program Documentation • No noteworthy strengths or areas for improvement identified Performance Objective – Assessments & Performance Indicators • Strengths - Senior Management Involvement (ORP) - Tracking of oversight results (ID) - Assessment schedules and results available on-line (RL) - Increasingly mature Contractor Assurance Systems (PX, Y-12) - Operational awareness database provides real-time documentation and tracking of oversight results (RL) • Areas for Improvement - Some sites not yet compliant with DOE O 226.1 requirements - Detailed Contractor Assurance System gap analysis needed - Lack of effective metrics/measures for trending of nuclear and ES&H performance - Training and qualifications of assessment personnel 2

  3. F&I Assessment Results Performance Objective – Operating Experience • Strengths - Effective system to utilize/track DOE Lessons Learned, Safety Notices and Bulletins, and other documentation in issues management system(ORP) - Process that utilizes DOE and external lessons learned in work packages, training, and planned assessments (SRS, NTS) • Areas for Improvement - Lessons learned data not entered or used - Lack of identifying and incorporating external lessons learned - Lack of emphasis on reporting positive lessons learned - Lessons learned procedures and processes not current/updated 3

  4. F&I Assessment Results Performance Objective – Event Reporting • Strengths - Working group to identify and resolve event precursors (RL) - Senior management oversight of safety issues (ID) • Areas for Improvement - Not identifying recurring issues - Causal analysis not performed - Lessons learned not incorporated into training programs 4

  5. F&I Assessment Results Performance Objective – Issues Management • Strengths - Senior management involvement in issues (CBFO, ID, ORP, SRS) - DOE LL, Safety Notices and Bulletins included in issues management system (ORP) - Use of working group to evaluate performance data (RL) - Committee approach for determining efficacy of long-term issues resolution (CBFO) - High-performing issues management system (Y-12) • Areas for Improvement - Ineffective trending of issues to prevent recurrences - Implementation of corrective action program deficient - Lack metrics to demonstrate sites are using F&I to improve performance - Issues management processes do not always identify root causes 5

  6. F&I Assessment Results Performance Objective – DOE Line Management Oversight • Strengths - Senior management involvement (ORP) - Comprehensive identification of all DOE assessment requirements (ORP) - Common CRAD to evaluate multiple facilities (RL) - Effective use of feedback to focus/target oversight activities (RL) - Strong management walkthrough program (SRSO) - Trending and analysis of event precursors (PXSO) • Areas for Improvement - Facility Representative procedures do not reflect DOE O 226.1 requirements - DOE 226.1 compliance review not completed - Lack of or deficient processes for determining effectiveness of contractor assurance systems - Balancing/prioritizing resources for contractor oversight assessments and follow-up activities - Technical qualifications and staffing plans for safety assurance personnel 6

  7. Breakout Discussion Path Forward Options • Collective solutions to common areas for improvement • Match individual sites with strengths and areas for improvement for tailored solutions • Each site and program address F&I issues individually • Other 7

More Related