290 likes | 448 Views
E N D
2. 2
3. Personal Genomics Challenges
Evidence, evidence, evidence
Analytic validity
Clinical validity
Clinical utility
Cost-effectiveness analysis
Who wants this information, how will it be used
4. Personal Genomics
Personalized medicine is only as good as the test used to inform drug selection and dose.
The current regulatory system is ill-equipped to meet this challenge.
The right diagnostic is key to determining the right drug and the right dose.
6. Two Types of Tests Laboratory developed tests (so-called homebrews)
Test “kits”
Level of regulatory oversight oddly disparate
Difference not apparent to patients and health care providers.
7. 7
8. 8
9. Problems with “Two Path” System Different standards based on mode of delivery (LDT v. Kit)
Absence of public access to information
Economic disincentive to FDA route
Difference in level of validation opaque to physicians and patient
Inadequate oversight of claims
Disincentive to develop
point-of-care tests with
global significance
10. CMS Regulation of Genetic Testing Laboratories
No requirement for proficiency testing (no external assessment of analytic validity)
No evaluation of clinical validity
Little public access to information
No authority over claims and labels
Buried in an agency with a different mission and expertise
11. FDA Regulation of Tests Test kits
Evidence of clinical validity for intended use(s) included in submission
Authority over manufacturer or distributor claims
Only a few human genetic tests have been approved by FDA as kits
Laboratory-developed tests
Enforcement discretion
IVDMIA confusion
Ovasure oddity
15. PGx in the label
16. Variables in PGx Drug Re-labeling Indication Efficacy vs. Toxicity vs. Dosage
Analyte Human vs. Microbial
Language Required vs. Recommended vs. Info
Timing Pre-market vs. post-market
on or off patent
Diagnostic FDA cleared IVD or CLIA only
Alternatives Other drugs available for indication
17. Tale of two drugs, two adverse reactions, and two HLA-B alleles
18. Abacavir (Ziagen®) Glaxo-Smith Kline
Inhibits the activity of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase
Hypersensitivity to abacavir is characterized by:
Fever
Rash
Gastrointestinal (including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, or abdominal pain)
Constitutional (including generalized malaise, fatigue, or achiness)
Respiratory (including dyspnea, cough, or pharyngitis).
19. Genetic Variant Associated with Adverse Events (Abacavir) Hypersensitivity to abacavir was reported in approximately 8% of 2,670 patients (n = 206) in 9 clinical trials (range: 2% to 9%) with enrollment from November 1999 to February 2002.
Patients who carry the HLA-B*5701 allele are at high risk for experiencing a hypersensitivity reaction to abacavir.
20. PREDICT-1 Clinical Trial April 2006-April 2007 (n = 1,650)
randomized, double-blind study
Evaluated prospective HLA-B*5701 screening on the incidence of abacavir hypersensitivity reaction
Use of pre-therapy screening for the HLA-B*5701 allele and exclusion of subjects with this allele reduced the incidence of clinically suspected abacavir hypersensitivity reactions
61% of patients with the HLA-B*5701 allele will develop a clinically suspected hypersensitivity reaction during the course of abacavir treatment compared with 4% of patients who do not have the HLA-B*5701 allele.
21. Black Box Warning WARNING: HYPERSENSITIVITY REACTIONS/LACTIC ACIDOSIS AND SEVERE HEPATOMEGALY
• Serious and sometimes fatal hypersensitivity reactions have been associated with ZIAGEN (abacavir sulfate). (5.1)
• Hypersensitivity to abacavir is a multi-organ clinical syndrome. (5.1)
• Patients who carry the HLA-B*5701 allele are at high risk for experiencing a hypersensitivity reaction to abacavir. (5.1)
• Discontinue ZIAGEN as soon as a hypersensitivity reaction is suspected. Regardless of HLA-B*5701 status, permanently discontinue ZIAGEN if hypersensitivity cannot be ruled out, even when other diagnoses are possible. (5.1)
• Following a hypersensitivity reaction to abacavir, NEVER restart ZIAGEN or any other abacavir-containing product. (5.1)
• Lactic acidosis and severe hepatomegaly with steatosis, including fatal cases, have been reported with the use of nucleoside analogues. (5.2)
22. Carbamazepine (Tegretol®) Novartis
Sodium channel blocker
Anti-convulsion and mood stabilizing drug used primarily in the treatment of epilepsy and bipolar disorder.
It is also used to treat ADD, ADHD, schizophrenia, Phantom limb syndrome, Paroxysmal extreme pain disorder, and trigeminal neuralgia
23. Genetic Variant Associated with Adverse Events - Carbamazepine Retrospective case-control studies found association between HLA-B*1502 variant and risk of developing Steven Johnson Syndrome and Toxic epidermal necrolysis with carbamazepine treatment.
Prevalence of HLA-B*1502 higher in people from China, Taiwan, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, and the Philippines.
24. 2004 Medical genetics: a marker for Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Chung WH, Hung SI, Hong HS, Hsih MS, Yang LC, Ho HC, Wu JY, Chen YT. Nature. 2004 Apr 1;428(6982):486.
2007 Investigation into the multidimensional genetic basis of drug-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. Pirmohamed M, Arbuckle JB, Bowman CE, Brunner M, Burns DK, Delrieu O, Dix LP, Twomey JA, Stern RS. Pharmacogenomics. 2007 Dec;8(12):1661-91.
Dec 19, 2007, FDA requested change to package insert
March 1, 2008, FDA issues updated label
FDA moves at the speed of light
25. Black Box Warning: SERIOUS DERMATOLOGIC REACTIONS AND HLA-B*1502 ALLELE
Serious and sometimes fatal dermatologic reactions, including toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) and Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS), have been reported ….
These reactions are estimated to occur in 1 to 6 per 10,000 new users in countries with mainly Caucasian populations,
But, the risk in some Asian countries is estimated to be about 10 times higher.
Studies in patients of Chinese ancestry have found a strong association between the risk of developing SJS/TEN and the presence of HLA-B*1502 and inherited allelic variant of the HLA-B gene.
HLA-B*1502 is found almost exclusively in patients with ancestry across broad areas of Asia.
PATIENTS WITH ANCESTRY IN GENETICALLY AT RISK POPULATIONS SHOULD BE SCREENED FOR THE PRESENCE OF HLA-B*1502 PRIOR TO INITIATING TREATMENT WITH TEGRETOL.
26. Epilepsy Drugs Currently Approved and Marketed Carbamazepine
Carbatrol®
Clobazam
Clonazepam
Depakene®
Depakote®
Depakote ER®
Diastat
Dilantin®
Ethosuximide
Felbatol® Luminal
Lyrica
Mysoline®
Neurontin®
Oxcarbazepine
Phenobarbital
Phenytek®
Phenytoin
Primidone
Rufinamide
Sabril
27. Abacavir and Carbamazepine Timelines Abacavir Dec 1998 – approved
Mar 2002 – genotype id’d
Aug 2006 – trial begins
Aug 2007 – trial results
Feb 2008 – trial published
Jul 2008 – black box warning
Carbamazepine 1974 – approved
Apr 2004 – genotype id’d
No prospective trial
Dec 2007 – retrospective published
Mar 2008 – black box warning
28. FDA fickleness
Retrospective studies sufficient sometimes
RCTs required sometimes
Black box warnings are not warm and fuzzy
If alternative is available, physicians may not be willing to test to treat
Pharmaceutical companies seeking ‘genotype neutral’ drugs?