250 likes | 258 Views
Learn about the process of assessing information literacy skills in student papers using rubrics. Discover the challenges, trends, and potential improvements in information literacy assessment.
E N D
Imperfect but Authentic and Invaluable Information Literacy Assessment by Applying Rubrics to Anonymized Student Papers Dana Longley Assistant Director for Library Instruction and Information Literacy Slides:
Not Your Typical College • Non-traditional students • 18,600+ primarily part-time, working adults (ave age: 35) • 50% blended, 50% fully online • 7 overlapping terms schedule • No “campus” (35 regional centers in NYS + overseas) • Highly individualized study • Customizable degree programs • One-on-one mentoring • Narrative feedback (tests not generally used) • No required courses
Online Library • Small staff (4 PEs) • No director, student workers, or support staff • Fully online collections (no physical library) • No student info lit requirements (infused Info Mgt Gen Ed)
Learning Assessment Timeline • 1980s: Area of Study reviews (degree portfolios) • 2002-03: SUNY-wide Gen. Ed. assessments • 2007-08: Assessments in the Major • 2012: College Learning Goals Policy drafted. Includes: • “Information and Digital Media Literacy: Critically access, evaluate, understand, create and share information using a range of collaborative technologies to advance learning, as well as personal and professional development.“
Info Lit Assessments Official: • Gen. Ed. Info Management: via sample of student papers Unofficial: • Assessment in the Major: student papers • Synchronous Library Workshops: pre- & post-tests (voluntary) • Research Skills self-paced tutorial (voluntary) • 2 credit Info Lit course (voluntary)
Information Management Competency: Ability to locate and use information from a variety of sources Outcomes: • Determine the quality of information needed • Locate an appropriate variety of information • Evaluate information and resources critically • Use information effectively to accomplish a specific purpose • Attribute external information sources and ideas correctly
Pre-Assessment Process • Managed/owned by Office of Decision Support • Appropriate advanced level courses and assignments ID’d by faculty • Assessment team volunteers sought and verified • Papers + assignment instructions put into Adobe and all personal info scrubbed • Team reviews/discusses rubric and conducts norming session
Team Assessment Sessions 2-day formal assessment session: • 4-6 assessors • Most samples rated by 2 members • Ratings input into Survey Monkey • Analysis & inter-rater reliability via SPSS • Team discusses follow-up recommendations • Decision Support crafts report • Report shared internally
Pros and Cons? Pros: • Authentic student work • Faculty and librarian input Cons: • Workload intensive when done • Uses online courses only (not representative?) • Some assignments don't fit rubric well • Small team sizes • Subjectivity of rubric interpretation & scores? • No formal mechanism for implementing recommendations
Possible broad conclusions? • Not great! • >50% samples = “does not meet” or “approaches” • Perception of info lit concepts growing among faculty? • Students have trouble especially with: • Synthesis • Evaluation • Attribution
Credit Course Data Self-assessment quiz at start: • Students struggle with: • Topic formation • ID of non-standard citations • Search strings • Understanding what lit reviews and primary sources are • In-text citations • Terminology (library jargon): journal vs journal article; database • Students already have some knowledge of: • ID of journal & book citations • Peer-review • Plagiarism basics • Basic publication types
Looking Forward Ongoing or near future: • Update Information Management rubric • Better ID of relevant research assignments • Info Lit self-assessment in online orientation • Increased faculty awareness of IL assessment results & course and curricula remediation options Longer term: • Similar paper assessment between 4 yr periods (by library?)
Questions? • Slides: dana.longley@esc.edu @disobedientlib (twitter)