1 / 18

The Centre & the Sharing Innovative Practice program

Sharing Innovative Practice: Promoting evidence-informed practice to enhance outcomes for vulnerable children and their families 21 st August 2012. The Centre & the Sharing Innovative Practice program Since 2010, we have been motivating the use of program logic

alec
Download Presentation

The Centre & the Sharing Innovative Practice program

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sharing Innovative Practice: Promoting evidence-informed practice to enhance outcomes for vulnerable children and their families 21st August 2012

  2. The Centre & the Sharing Innovative Practice program • Since 2010, we have been motivating the use of program logic • Imbedding an evaluative thinking and capacity into a practice environment • It’s an ideal starting point and easy to understand and use • Client outcomes driven, the Centre’s focus • Protecting Vulnerable Children's Enquiry (2012) highlighted the need systematic and rigorous evaluation.

  3. Spreading the word… • Design and disseminate the Innovative Practice Toolkit 2010 • Introduction workshops • Mentoring the program logic process • Author program logic processes • NEW Research & Evaluation Support

  4. Outputs so far… • Over 200 hard copies and 100 soft copies of the toolkit distributed • So far 197 child, youth & family service professionals attended a workshop, training session, symposium or Knowhow session • 3 program logics completed on (average programs have been running for 6 years without any previous review process) • 3 on-line learning environments have been developed

  5. Program Logic The Pitch

  6. Why Program Logic? • It’s easy! • Avoid ‘spinning the wheels’ • Identifies levels of change in client outcomes • Acts like road map

  7. Mentoring Program Logic A case study

  8. Mallee Accommodation Support Program (MASP) Mildura VIC • 12 month mentor program to trek Kokoda trail PNG • Program Manager, Senior Practitioner & Youth Worker • 8 months co-creation • Since 2006 no measures established • Adventure Therapy advisory CFECFW

  9. Program logic begins by identify the context • The ultimate social goal • Relationship to the • organisation’s goals • Establishment of • a program goal Bush Adventure Therapy MASP Theoretical Framework Program Logic

  10. Mentors Young People Program Outcome Statement …to motivate young participants so that they feel that their individual contribution is an important component towards the development of our society. This motivation is inspired by the recognition of the service men of Australian forces and their commitment on the Kokoda track in World War II. Community

  11. Identify outcomes – the outcomes hierarchy • Emotional and self-development skills • Leadership, self-esteem and teamwork • Links to education, training and employment • Engage educational institutions, businesses and service providers • Physical fitness • Mentors develop mentoring skills NEW Indicators

  12. Linking activities to recognised outcomes

  13. Underpinning evidence for program assumptions • Mentoring relationship between adult and young person has a significant positive impact. (DuBois & Karcher 2005) (Clary & Rhodes 2006) • Increased physical activity of young people decreases the likelihood of drug & alcohol use and enhances social and emotional development. (Lyman, Prentince-Dunn & Gabel 1989) (Scott 2009) • An adventure orientated program helps to disengaged young people to reconnect with mainstream society. (Deakin 2002) (Lyman, Prentince-Dunn & Gabel 1989) • The general community benefit from an increase in young people participating in the local community. (Mentor/National Mentoring Partnership 2005)

  14. Factors that influence the outcomes Within control; Not within control, Support achievement, What could go wrong and; Counteract what could go wrong e.g. Last minute nerves are met with resilience building strategies

  15. Evidence of outcomes For young people … • Out of 56 young people (since 2011) only 3 have left town, 4 are doing tertiary studies and 13 are in training/education/employment pathways post the program • All young people increased their health and wellbeing over the 12 month mentoring period. Many continue to maintain a healthy lifestyle For mentors … • Since 2011, 68 mentors at PNG and 75 mentors have participated in the training • Approximately 16 mentor and mentee relationships have continued (as known to the program) • For the local community … • $15,000 - $18,000 have been raised each year from community fundraising activities • The program been featured in local radio, newspaper and local TV 18 times

  16. Helping organisations understand the effectiveness of their work… MASP use of program logic… • Stronger communication on the program’s effectiveness • Networking tool for sharing and promotion • Future evaluation

  17. Thank you Bec Jolly - Policy and Project Leader, Sharing Innovative Practice rebecca.jolly@cfecfw.asn.au PH 03 9614 1577 or MB 0434 182 857 Amanda Stevenson – Manager, Research and Social Policy amanda.stevenson@cfecfw.asn.au PH 03 9614 1577

  18. Program Logic = better position for success Systematise program planning, management, and evaluation functions.

More Related