1 / 25

Are the relativistic Fe lines really relativistic?

Are the relativistic Fe lines really relativistic?. Traineeship 2009 :. A systematic analysis of the Fe K line from inner region of accretion disk of Neutron star LMXB with XMM-Newton. Supervisors : Maria Diaz- Trigo Marion Cadolle Simone Migliari. Cherry Ng September 24 th 2009.

alexia
Download Presentation

Are the relativistic Fe lines really relativistic?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Are the relativistic Fe lines really relativistic? Traineeship 2009 : A systematic analysis of the Fe K line from inner region of accretion disk of Neutron star LMXB with XMM-Newton • Supervisors: • Maria Diaz-Trigo • Marion Cadolle • Simone Migliari Cherry Ng September 24th 2009

  2. Outline Fe K emission line Inner region of the accretion disk Objectives Data analysis Results Conclusion Importance of pile-up treatment Relativistic Fe K line ? Outline

  3. Neutron Star Low-mass X-ray binaries (NS LMXB)‏ Low-mass star Roche-lobe overflow Accretion disk Weakly magnetized NS • Fe K emission line • Typical energy : ~ 6.5keV Objectives

  4. Neutron Star Low-mass X-ray binaries (NS LMXB)‏ Cackett et al (2008) ApJ 674:415-420 Low-mass star Roche-lobe overflow Accretion disk Weakly magnetized NS • Fe K emission line • Typical energy : ~ 6.5keV Objectives

  5. Neutron Star Low-mass X-ray binaries (NS LMXB)‏ • Systematic analysis • All publicly available bright Neutron Star LMXB • XMM-Newton •  26 observations •  17 sources Objectives

  6. Treatment of Pile-up Single & Double-px event pattern plot of Ser X1 No. of counts normalized to 1 • Common problem of bright sources • 2 photons of lower energy read as 1 photon of higher energy • Distortion of spectra Data analysis

  7. Treatment of Pile-up Single & Double-px event pattern plot of Ser X1 No. of counts normalized to 1 Single-px event Double-px event • Common problem of bright sources • 2 photons of lower energy read as 1 photon of higher energy • Distortion of spectra Data analysis

  8. Treatment of Pile-up Single & Double-px event pattern plot of Ser X1 Comparison of Ser X1 spectra before and after pile-up removal No. of counts normalized to 1 Single-px event Double-px event • Common problem of bright sources • 2 photons of lower energy read as 1 photon of higher energy • Distortion of spectra Data analysis

  9. Treatment of Pile-up Single & Double-px event pattern plot of Ser X1 Comparison of Ser X1 spectra before and after pile-up removal No. of counts normalized to 1 Single-px event Excessemission Double-px event Before pile-up removal After pile-up removal • Common problem of bright sources • 2 photons of lower energy read as 1 photon of higher energy • Distortion of spectra Data analysis

  10. Evolution of spectrum fit ( + + ) + abs gaussian diskbbody+bbodyrad Fe K line gaussian+gaussian calib 1.84keV calib 2.28keV Emission 1keV Data analysis

  11. Evolution of spectrum fit ( + + ) + abs abs gaussian diskbbody+bbodyrad diskbbody+bbodyrad Fe K line gaussian+gaussian calib 1.84keV calib 2.28keV Emission 1keV Data analysis

  12. Evolution of spectrum fit ( + + ) + abs gaussian diskbbody+bbodyrad Fe K line gaussian+gaussian gaussian+gaussian calib 1.84keV calib 2.28keV Emission 1keV Data analysis

  13. Evolution of spectrum fit ( + + ) + abs gaussian gaussian diskbbody+bbodyrad Fe K line gaussian+gaussian calib 1.84keV calib 2.28keV Emission 1keV Data analysis

  14. Evolution of spectrum fit ( + + ) + abs gaussian gaussian diskbbody+bbodyrad Fe K line gaussian+gaussian calib 1.84keV calib 2.28keV Emission 1keV Data analysis

  15. Evolution of spectrum fit ( + + ) + abs gaussian diskbbody+bbodyrad Fe K line Fe K line gaussian+gaussian calib 1.84keV calib 2.28keV Emission 1keV Data analysis

  16. Evolution of spectrum fit ( + + ) + abs gaussian diskbbody+bbodyrad Fe K line Fe K line gaussian+gaussian calib 1.84keV calib 2.28keV Emission 1keV Data analysis

  17. Evolution of spectrum fit ( + + ) + abs gaussian diskbbody+bbodyrad Fe K line gaussian+gaussian calib 1.84keV calib 2.28keV Emission 1keV Data analysis

  18. Evolution of spectrum fit ( + + ) + abs abs gaussian gaussian diskbbody+bbodyrad diskbbody+bbodyrad Fe K line Fe K line gaussian+gaussian gaussian+gaussian calib 1.84keV calib 2.28keV Emission 1keV Data analysis

  19. Gaussian & Laor comparison on 4U 1543-62 Gaussian Laor Data analysis

  20. Gaussian & Laor comparison on 4U 1543-62 Gaussian Laor Data analysis

  21. Gaussian & Laor comparison on 4U 1543-62 Gaussian Laor Data analysis

  22. Gaussian & Laor comparison on 4U 1543-62 Gaussian Laor • Narrow line width • Small inner radius • Similar X² • Insignificant evidence of asymmetric profile Data analysis

  23. Comparing results with published data Results

  24. Statistics on equivalent width Results

  25. Conclusion • Relativistic origin for the broadening of Fe cannot be claimed • Further higher resolution spectroscopic data needed --> to place better constraints on possible contribution to the line emission from various parts of disk Thankyou !  Conclusion

More Related