90 likes | 105 Views
This study explores how metaphors shape public perceptions of biotechnology in the UK, analyzing the socio-cognitive approach and conceptual metaphor theory. Examining previous research, benefits, risks, ethics, and metaphors in the media influence stakeholders and policy.
E N D
Is Franken Food Food • for Thought?
Introduction and Background • Previous research • Public attitudes to biotechnology in Britain • Metaphor as argument and interaction in the debate • Metaphor in a critical perspective
Public attitudes to biotechnology(e.g. Frewer et al. 1995, 1997; Hviid Nielsen et al. 2002) • Risk • Benefits • Ethics • Two segments Modernist ‘green’ Traditional ‘blue’
Conceptual Metaphor Theory(e.g. Lakoff & Johnson 1980; Lakoff 1993; Lakoff & Turner 1989; Chilton 1996; Musolff 2000) • Metaphor is primarily cognitive, but realised linguistically • Metaphors are coherent, systematic and pervasive • Metaphors are conceptual, while at the same time strategic and intentional
The Socio-Cognitive Approach(e.g. Van Dijk 1997, 1998, 2001, 2002) • Combining the social and the cognitive • Group structure and schema • Consequences for the study of metaphor
The UK GM debate • UK national debate on GM issues • Metaphorical mappings in the first report • Battle & Invasion • Personification • Liquids & Paths
Concluding remarks • Metaphors as deliberate choice • Metaphor as reflecting and influencing public attitudes