1 / 25

Wireless sensor networks for Forest fire detection

Wireless sensor networks for Forest fire detection. OUTLINE. INTRODUCTION TYPES OF SENSOR NODES MOTE ARCHITECTURE APPLICATION AS A FOREST FIRE DETECTION CONCLUSION. Communication architecture of Sensor networks. 4. Types of Sensor Nodes(motes). Gateway’s Nodes Common Nodes.

alfonso-gomez
Download Presentation

Wireless sensor networks for Forest fire detection

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Wireless sensor networksfor Forest fire detection

  2. OUTLINE • INTRODUCTION • TYPES OF SENSOR NODES • MOTE ARCHITECTURE • APPLICATION AS A FOREST FIRE DETECTION • CONCLUSION

  3. Communication architecture of Sensor networks 4

  4. Types of Sensor Nodes(motes) • Gateway’s Nodes • Common Nodes

  5. Mote Architecture

  6. Applications1.Military applications 2.Health applications 3.Commercial applications 4.Environmental applications 4.1 Habitat Monitoring 4.2 Forest Fire Detection

  7. Animals as Mobile Biological Sensors For forest Fire Detection

  8. Animals used for sensing

  9. Sensors Used for detection

  10. Method of detection in Proposed System • Thermal detection • Animal Behavior Classification.

  11. Data gather from MBSs Normal Abnormal

  12. Animal behavior classification

  13. Monitoring animals locations via Satellite.

  14. Network architecture

  15. Infrastructure

  16. Objectives to be thought of: • How reliably and timely can the system detect a physical stimulus? • How well does the system detect, localize or track physical stimuli? • How does the system perform in the presence of node or link failures as wells as malicious attacks?

  17. Tools to be used • Wireless Sensor Nodes • Navigator (GPS) • Computer • TinyOS Embedded wireless sensor software • NesC, Simulator

  18. Resource Requirement • Permission to study the behavior of animal and to use in the experimental setup. • MOTES used as a sensor, costing $1225.00 a Kit

  19. Advantages • More dynamic and wider detection as compared to fixed sensors. • Reduction in cost. • Unreachable areas can now be controlled by MBSs. • To detect poaching, and monitor comprehensive animal deaths. • Proposed methods are very convenient and can easily detect.

  20. DISADVANTAGES Neither easy to capture suitable animals from the environment nor equip them with sensors. • Possibility of lack of appropriate animals for special forests. • Determining climate conditions, daily temp differences, seasonal normal temp values, etc. are problematic. • Use of batteries create environmental pollution, introducing extra radiation and cadmium to the forest and animals. • Moreover, each battery needs to be changed periodically, but capturing the MBS to do this is not easy.

  21. Conclusions • New wireless technologies and new satellite tracking systems can be adapted to increase the efficiency of the system • New sensors can be produced or existing sensors can be improved to increase robustness of the proposed system. • A number of investigations can be made regarding animal behavior in case of fire to improve system reliability.

More Related