1 / 27

Wireless Sensor Networks in Tsunami Detection

Wireless Sensor Networks in Tsunami Detection. TCOM 510 Wireless Networking Soumya Sen, Prerit Gupta, Redwan Kabir. Outline. Tsunami Tsunami Detection System (TDS) Previous Underwater Sensor Networks Current Research on Tsunami Detection Acoustic Sensor Networks in TDS Conclusion.

kendis
Download Presentation

Wireless Sensor Networks in Tsunami Detection

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Wireless Sensor Networks in Tsunami Detection TCOM 510 Wireless Networking Soumya Sen, Prerit Gupta, Redwan Kabir

  2. Outline • Tsunami • Tsunami Detection System (TDS) • Previous Underwater Sensor Networks • Current Research on Tsunami Detection • Acoustic Sensor Networks in TDS • Conclusion

  3. Tsunami • Tsunami is a series of waves generated when a body of water such as a lake or ocean is rapidly displaced on a massive scale. Primary causes of Tsunami are- • Earthquakes • Underwater landslides • Underwater volcanic eruptions • Meteoric impact

  4. The Asian Tsunami of 2004

  5. Tsunami Detection System • A Tsunami Detection System is a system to detect tsunamis and issue warnings to prevent loss of life. This system uses seismic data as its starting point, but then also takes into account oceanographic data when calculating possible threats. It consists of two equally important aspects: • A network of sensors to detect tsunamis • A communications infrastructure to issue timely alarms to permit evacuation of coastal areas

  6. Previous UW Sensor Networks • The traditional approach for ocean-bottom or ocean-column monitoring is to deploy underwater sensors that record data during the monitoring mission, and then recover the instruments. The problems with this approach in the detection of tsunamis are manifold. • No real time monitoring • No online system reconfiguration • No failure detection • Limited Storage Capacity

  7. Current Tsunami Warning Systems • The current tsunami warning systems being deployed all over the world have two essential components. We suggest the third component, a global positioning system for faster and more accurate determination of earthquake magnitudes, which is essential for timely tsunami warnings. • Buoy – Bottom Pressure Recorder System (Tsunameter) • Satellite N etwork • Global Positioning System

  8. Buoy – Bottom Pressure Recorder System The BPRS uses a quartz crystal resonator to measure ambient pressure and temperature. The resonator uses a thin quartz crystal beam, electrically induced to vibrate at its lowest resonant mode. It communicates these measurements to the surface buoy through an acoustic modem.

  9. GPS in Tsunami Detection Currently, estimating the magnitude of earthquakes accurately takes around 1 hour or more. In the case of tsunami detection, where time is of essence, measuring seismic activity as quickly as possible is of utmost importance. An earthquake's true size and tsunami potential can be determined using Global Positioning System (GPS) data up to only 15 min after earthquake initiation, by tracking the mean displacement of the Earth's surface associated with the arrival of seismic waves.

  10. Satellite Network The surface buoys are connected to a satellite network, which is used to relay information and commands from the BPRS to a Tsunami warning center or vice versa.

  11. DART IISystem

  12. Communication Network Design

  13. Challenges for Acoustic Sensor Networks (ASN) • Battery power is limited • Available bandwidth is limited • Undesired channel characteristics, delay variance. • High bit error rates, attenuation, noise • Underwater sensors are prone to failure because of fouling, corrosion etc.

  14. ASN Architecture

  15. B/W Ranges of UWA channels

  16. Design issues: Physical layer • ASK- attenuation! • PSK- coherent detection! (difficult PLL) - Differential PSK (solves the coherent detection problem partially, but error probability is higher) • FSK- non-coherent energy detection based (guard bands needed) • OFDM- good one (use bit loading) • Modern technology can use QAM & PSK with feedback channels (Decision Feedback equalizers)

  17. Data Link Layer • FDMA not very suitable due to narrow b/w and vulnerability of limited band systems to fading and multipath. • TDMA has limited b/w efficiency because of long time guards, synchronization issue. • CSMA can prevent collisions at Tx side, but not on receiver side, inefficient protocol. • RTS/CTS-impractical (large delays, synchronization issue) • CDMA –at last! Robust to freq selective fading, less retransmissions, less power needed • FEC (as ARQ is inefficient here)

  18. Network layer • Routing information -Proactive: DSDV (too much overhead & memory req) -Reactive: AOVD (too slow, requires flooding!) -Geographical routing protocols (localization information, GPS isn’t too accurate for UWSN) -Centralized network manager (polling) Multi-hop routing requires less energy than single hop in UW scenarios. Use of Virtual Circuits for UW-ASNs.

  19. Transport Layer • Still no good protocols proposed! • Flow control, congestion control needed. • But traditional end-to-end guarantee may not feasible here- RTT too high! • Research directions: integrating these at the lower layers where we have channel information.

  20. Application layer • Not explored yet! • Directions: SRB (storage Resource broker), a client-server middleware that provides uniform interface for connecting to heterogeneous data resources over a network, and accessing replicated data sets based on their attributes or logical names rather than physical location or name.

  21. Deployment of BPRS Deep-Ocean Assessment and Reporting of Tsunamis (DART) sized buoys are generally large, weighing over 4000 kg. They require the use of larger boats that have A-frame structures and cranes. Buoys must be serviced every 1-2 years.

  22. accomplish data telemetry and remote control for a set of widely spaced oceanographic sensors by using through-water acoustic signaling (telesonar) to form an undersea wireless network (Seaweb) The Front-Resolving Observational Network with Telemetry (FRONT)–Univ. of Connecticut

  23. List of FRONT experiments done

  24. Present UWSN:Deep-ocean Assessment and Reporting of Tsunamishttp://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/dart.shtml

  25. Conclusion In light of the events of the 2004 tsunami in South Asia, there has been an increasing concern about future tsunami threats, and with it, growing interest in tsunami detection and prevention systems. This presentation has shown that Wireless Sensor Networks can be used for successful and timely detection of tsunami. We presented the basic concepts, challenges, design issues and research directions in UWSN.

  26. References • Underwater acoustic sensor networks: research challenges, Ian F. Akyildiz , Dario Pompili, Tommaso Melodia • Rapid determination of earthquake magnitude using GPS for tsunami warning systems,Geoffrey Blewitt, Corné Kreemer, William C. Hammond, Hans-Peter Plag, Seth Stein and Emile Okal • http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/Dart/dart.shtml • http://web.mit.edu/12.000/www/m2009/teams/5/ • http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/tsunami/Dart/dart_sh1.html

  27. Questions? Questions? Thank you!

More Related