1 / 16

Technology development in the EU-27

Technology development in the EU-27. In search of the contribution by SMEs. Small & medium sized enterprises. SMEs are seen as an essential driver of economic growth in Europe ( Eurostat 2009) 99,8% of non-financial companies in Europe classify as SMEs

alice
Download Presentation

Technology development in the EU-27

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Technology development in the EU-27 In search of the contributionbySMEs

  2. Small & medium sizedenterprises • SMEsare seen as anessential driver of economicgrowth in Europe (Eurostat 2009) • 99,8% of non-financial companies in Europe classify as SMEs • Within the non-financial business economy SMEs represent • 57,4% of turnover • 58,7% of value added • 66,7% of employment • SMEsare assumedtoplaya pivotalrole in the innovationprocess (EC 2000) • Abilitytorespondquicklytochanging market needs • Ideal setting todevelopandroll out new technologies

  3. The importance of IP strategy in R&D intensive SMEs • Corporate IP strategy: howtoprotect market positionandcompetitive advantage createdthroughsustained R&D efforts? How toappropriate returns fromextensive R&D andincrease operating profitandaddedvalue?  2 IP strategy options: • Secrecy • Intellectual property rights • Signalingfunction of patents (especially relevant forSMEs): • Tocustomers: brand and marketing value • Toinvestorsandcreditors: granted patents suggest novelty of technologyandpotentialforfutureearningsattracting VC,… • To employees: attractpromisingpersonnel, enhance employee moral • …

  4. BarriersforSMEstoapplyfor IPR • Barriers for SMEs to engage in patent activity • Lack of understanding of IPRsandapplication procedures • Fearfordisclosinginnovationtoindustry majors • Cost of patent application: patent office administrativefees, patent attorneyfees, industrial property consultancy • Cost of maintenance: (increasing) maintenance fees • Cost of legislationaftergrant: defencecoststoenforce patent protectionagainstinfringers(even worse in complex industries, defending a patent canmeanbetting the company foran SME)

  5. Policy awareness • Policy awareness regardingthe role of SMEswithinnationalinnovation systems • Europe: • European Commission hosts an IPR-helpdesk for SMEs • Unitary EPO patent (25 of 27 member states), reducing administrative costs, translation costs and litigation costs • Japan: • SME IP support at prefectural SME support centers • Database of senior personnel in large companies with experience in IP • Prior-art patent searching free of charge for a.o.SMEs • Reduction and exemption of patent annuities for a.o. SMEs • Accelerated examination system • JPO assistance for strategic foreign applications by regional SMEs • Large scalemappingand monitoring of SME contributiontopatentingis currently absent! Duetoconsiderablemethodologicalchallenges,

  6. Patent data: opportunitiesandchallenges • Opportunities: systematicavailability of patent data (e.g. PATSTAT) withdetailed information on: • Applicants, inventors • Address information • Technology domain • Claims of the patent • Cited prior art • … • But: patent databases contain no business information on applicants, not even VAT number howtoidentifySME’samong patent applicants?

  7. European Commission 2003 SME definition: financials

  8. Financial data: opportunitiesandchallenges • Opportunities: systematic availability of financial data withdetailed info on turnover, staff, assets, shareholders, … • Deficienciesin financial data (e.g. Amadeus) • Duetonationallegislation, amongothers in line with European Commission accounting directives, certain types of companies (amongothers companies not trespassing certainsize criteria andhavingsimpleownershipstructures are notobligedtocomplywith full disclosureandcanpublishsimplifiedannual accounts or are exemptedfromdisclosing financial information altogether. • In additionserious issue with information coverage in financial databases (absence of firms, as well as absence of specific information on firmsthat are covered)  Relaxing the SME criteria

  9. European Commission 2003 SME definition: ownership • Company ownership information shouldbeconsidered as well: ‘SMEs’ partly or fullyownedbylarger companies can benefit from the financial strengthand/or centralized R&D / IP department expertise of the business group • assessment of shareholderstructure per company todeterminetruesize of a business and the resources towhichit has access (at the business entity or business group level) • Entitieswithmother company (+50%): dependent • Entities without mother company (no +50% shares): independent

  10. Feasibilitystudy • EUROSTAT (2012 – 2013): Feasibilitystudy on large-scaleidentification of SME contribution in patenting • ECOOM – INCENTIM (KU Leuven) • Coverage: EU-27 • Methodology: • Matching company names in patent database and financial database using name harmonizationtechniques • Disambiguation of multiple matches • Allocation of matchedpatenting companies withsufficient financial andownership information tosize-categories • Sizeverificationof representativesamples of unmatched corporate applicantsandmatched companies withinsufficient financial/ownership information (ongoing)

  11. Matching PATSTAT – AMADEUS

  12. SME vs.large company applicants

  13. SME vs large company applicants • Large entities • Independent small entities • Dependent small entities • Small at group level (consolidated financials available) • Large at group level (consolidated financials available) • At least large at group level (sum of mother & daughter financials) • Small entitieswithunknowndependence status (sample checks forextrapolation) • No financials available (sample checks forextrapolation)

  14. SME vs large company applications

  15. Overall corporate applicants matching/size-class status

  16. Contribution of this research • Scope of exercise: full EU-27 • Use of comprehensive SME definition • Incorporatingshareholder information • Dataset anddeducted indicators on SME contribution in technologydevelopmentwiththis scope andcoverageprovides a number of applied research perspectives: • Technology management in SMEs • Investors in technologySMEs • …

More Related