1 / 30

The University of Florida Water Institute

The University of Florida Water Institute. Wendy Graham, Ph. D., Water Institute Director, Carl Swisher Eminent Scholar. UF Water Institute Mission.

alice
Download Presentation

The University of Florida Water Institute

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The University of Florida Water Institute Wendy Graham, Ph. D., Water Institute Director, Carl Swisher Eminent Scholar

  2. UF Water Institute Mission • To bring together talent from throughout the University to address complex water issues through innovative interdisciplinary research, education and outreach programs

  3. Water Institute Goals • Improve basic knowledge of the physical, chemical, and biological processes in aquatic systems (rivers, lakes, estuaries, wetlands, soil and ground waters). • Enhance understanding of the interactions and interrelationships between human attitudes and activities, and aquatic systems • Develop and promote the adoption of improved methodologies for water management and policy development based on a strong foundation of science, engineering, management and law

  4. Water Institute Strategies • Develop partnerships with internal and external stakeholders to identify and prioritize critical water issues requiring interdisciplinary expertise; as well as to provide expertise and support for addressing these issues. • Integrate and strengthen UF water faculty expertise within existing Departments and Centers. • Recruit and train excellent students to pursue careers in water-related science, engineering, policy, planning, and management, bringing with them an interdisciplinary focus

  5. (www.waterinstitute.ufl.edu)

  6. Water Institute Programs: • Biennial Water Institute Symposium • Distinguished Scholar Seminar Series • Peer Review Services & Expert Assistance • Water Institute Graduate Fellows Program • Water Education Program for Public Officials • Program Initiation Fund • Interdisciplinary Research Projects

  7. Examples of Interdisciplinary Water Institute Research Projects: • Impact of Climate Variability and Climate Change on Water Supply Planning: Evaluating Risks, Increasing Resilience: Funded by NOAA • The Santa Fe River Basin Observatory: Exploring linkages between geology, hydrology, ecosystems and humans in a karst terrain: Funded by NSF • Understanding and Predicting the Impact of Climate Variability and Climate Change on Land Use and Land Cover Change via Socio-Economic Institutions in Southern Africa: Funded by NASA • Coupling conflicting response times of human decisions and natural systems in a water-subsidized Pacific MesoAmericabasin: Funded by NSF

  8. The Santa Fe River Basin Observatory: Exploring linkages between geology, hydrology, ecosystems and humans in a karst terrain Goal: Improve predictive understanding of hydrologic flow paths and travel times; nutrient sources, transport & transformation; and karst evolution and within an eogentic karst basin

  9. Santa Fe River Basin

  10. Research Questions • What are the topographic, geologic and climatic controls on streamflow generation processes and travel time distributions in eogentic karst basins, how do these affect the delivery of ecologically relevant solutes (e.g., C,N,P)? • What are the mechanisms governing coupled C, N, P cycles in in spring-fed rivers? • How do variations in the sources, transport, and mineralization rates of DIC/DOC/CO2affect carbonate weathering, dissolution and geomorphic evolution of carbonate terrains?

  11. Project Activities • Deploy high resolution sensors to investigate riverine nutrient dynamics and ecosystem metabolism under different hydrogeologic and flow regimes • Conduct dosing experiments in streams and aquifers to understand effects of DOM lability, DO availability, biological activity and flow regime on carbonate dissolution • Develop integrated physically-based deterministic and stochastic hydrologic models to investigate streamflowgeneration processes, travel time distributions, carbonate dissolution, and delivery of nutrients and dissolution products to the river

  12. Hydrologic Modeling Results • Using literature parameter values in integrated land surface- surface-subsurface hydrologic model (ParFlow) • Water balance, groundwater response, streamflow timing is good • Issues with rate of stream flow recession, especially after wet conditions

  13. Hydrologic Modeling Results • End Member Mixing Analysis indicates: • Missing component is from groundwater • Large surface water-groundwater exchange occurs during storm events. • GSA shows exchange is strongly influenced by magnitude and contrast between porous matrix and conduit permeabilitiies

  14. Particle tracking: Travel Time distributions by storm position New water Old water Old water

  15. Particle tracking: Effects of geology on median age of water

  16. Particle tracking results: Effects of geology on spatial distribution of water source and age Particle age in days 50,000 days~140 years No conduits No conduits, random k conduit k = 600 m/hr

  17. Future Work • Test sensitivity of findings to model spatial discretization, overland flow physics, conduit representation, degree of small-scale geologic heterogeneity • Develop an extended Kalman filter to optimally estimate spatially distributed model parameters and reduce model prediction uncertainty using streamflow, groundwater and EMMA data • Conduct particle tracking experiments to quantify effect of geologic heterogeneity on streamflow generation areas, travel paths and travel time distributions • Develop (semi-) analytical models to predict travel time distributions in integrated conduit, porous media, stream system.

  18. Spring Ecosystem Metabolism • Flow creates coherent (diel) downstream signals from cooupled ecosystem metabolic processes Raw Data: March 2011 • Carbon: Diel O2for riverine GPP, R (Odum 1956) • Carbonate Dynamics: DielSp Cond. for carbonate precipitation/dissolution • Nitrogen: Diel NO3for autotrophic N demand (Heffernan and Cohen 2010) • Phosphorus:Diel SRP for geochemical and biological P removal

  19. Coupled Carbon and Nitrogen Cycles • DIRECT: Net primary production and assimilative uptake of N are strongly correlated and yield plausible C:N • INDIRECT: Uptake due to denitrificationis correlated with respiration and previous days’ GPP (short and long term coupling)

  20. SRP Dynamics P removal due to assimilation and co-precipitation which produce signals that are out of phase

  21. Ecosystem Scale C and P Coupling • Coherent diel [SRP] signal, varying amplitude • Signal is convolution of 2 out-of-phase processes • Calcite co-precipitation (ca. 30% of removal) • Biotic assimilation (ca. 70% of removal) • Combined removal < 10% of total P flux • Calcite-corrected removal yields plausible C:P • P assimilation lags GPP by ca. 8 hours • Signal from the cell to the ecosystem?

  22. Future Work • Improve understanding of nutrient uptake in rivers by using diel signals to estimate nutrient use • Compare nutrient supply and use to better understand nutrient limitation • Evaluate coupled element cycles across the periodic table (e.g., beyond C, N, P) • Improve understanding of the role of rivers in both permanent and transient contaminant removal Kurz Diagram

  23. Interdisciplinary Research Challenges: • Effectively engaging diverse groups of faculty and students can be difficult : goals, values, vocabularies differ and take time to resolve • Participation is voluntary: the best are busy and don’t need money; must provide intellectually stimulating interactions • Funding is tight, and national sources are extremely competitive: patience and persistence are important • Can be difficult to quantify value added by formal interdisciplinary institutes: technically nothing prevents faculty from self-organizing

  24. Water Institute Accomplishments: • Changing the culture of how faculty and students work together to understand and solve interdisciplinary water-related problems • Facilitating networking both on campus and externally, with proactive focus on building new linkages between social and natural sciences • Providing platform for engaged scholarship on water issues • Serving as a go-to place for peer review and expert assistance for state agencies and legislature • Decreasing transaction costs associated with, and building the portfolio of, interdisciplinary research projects

  25. In summary… the Water Institute Provides… • Decision-makers, regulatory agencies, resource managers, industry and non-governmental organizations help in defining, understanding and solving large-scale interdisciplinary water resource problems • Graduate students, post-doctoral associates, faculty members, and sabbatical fellows an intellectually stimulating environment in which to develop and apply fundamental knowledge to important water resource problems • Employers a pool of well-trained water-related scientists, engineers, planners, and policy-makers.

  26. Questions…. Comments?

  27. Impact of Climate Variability and Climate Change on Water Supply Planning: Evaluating Risks, Increasing Resilience Goal: To increase the relevance and usability of climate and sea level rise models and reduce risk associated with water supply planning in Florida

  28. Project Activities • Develop a collaborative Working Group comprised of public water suppliers, water resource managers, climate scientists, and hydrologic scientists • Evaluate the practical applicability of current climate data/models predictions at utility relevant space-time scales • Evaluate the usefulness of these data/models for minimizing current and future public water supply risks associated with climate variability/climate change and/or sea level rise • Academic Partners: UF Water Institute ; UF Southeast Climate Consortium ; UF Center for Public Issues Education; FSU COAPS; U Miami RSMAS • Public Utilities: Broward County; West Palm Beach; GRU; Miami-Dade County; OUC; Palm Beach County; Peace River Manasota Regional Water Supply Authority; Tampa Bay Water • Water Management Districts: SFWMD, SWFWMD; SJRWMD

  29. Evaluate the applicability and usefulness of climate data/models/tools for water supply • SEASONAL SCALE PREDICTIONS–Diagnose and improve seasonal predictability and forecast skill for precipitation, temperature and streamflow • SEA LEVEL RISE– Improve understanding of potential impacts of sea level change on coastal aquifers, water resources, and ecosystems • LONG TERM CLIMATE PROJECTIONS–Evaluate the ability of downscaled reanalysis data and retrospective GCM output to reproduce historic climate and hydrologic patterns, and explore implications of future GCM projections on climate and hydrologic patterns

More Related