1 / 23

New Path to Excellence Revisions Impact of Consolidation on FHSD Academic Financial

Updates. New Path to Excellence Revisions Impact of Consolidation on FHSD Academic Financial 2013-2014 Status 2014-2015 Status Commissioner’s Plan (draft) Legislation. Ne w P at h Plan Developers Believe. E v e r y s tud e n t m a tt e r s E v e r y s ch oo l m a tt e r s

alima
Download Presentation

New Path to Excellence Revisions Impact of Consolidation on FHSD Academic Financial

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Updates • New Path to Excellence Revisions • Impact of Consolidation on FHSD • Academic • Financial • 2013-2014 Status • 2014-2015 Status • Commissioner’s Plan (draft) • Legislation

  2. NewPathPlan Developers Believe • Everystudentmatters • Everyschoolmatters • Everycommunity matters

  3. What Is the Same? • Continuefour levels of accreditation. • Continue focus on academically stressed schools. • Continue focus on early intervention. • Continue the belief that transferring children does not improve schools or school districts. • Continue the focus on building local control andempowering communities to improve their schools. • Continue the focus onevery student, every school, and every community matters.

  4. What Is Different? • Discontinued reference to the development of an Academic Achievement District. Replace with a committee of DESE and selected representatives from the school community/district. • Changed the number of years at each level and substituted a focus on achieving annual progress on priority areas identified by the DESE review team. • Added Progressing w/in Academically Stressed category. If a school in Level 3 makes annual progress in its priority areas, it will be designated as Academically Stressed and Progressing. No additional students may transfer out of the school under this designation. • Added a more detailed list of supports for Level 3. • Add categorical which will pay the difference between amount of state aid transmitted by sending sch district and the receiving school district. • When sending sch district become provisionally accredited, transportation no longer provided to receiving school district.

  5. Distribution of Points in MSIP5

  6. WithMSIP5theProblemGetsWorse PotentialStatus 2012-13MSIP5* Provisional&Unaccredited CurrentStatus 4th CycleMSIPProvisional&Unaccredited PemiscotCo.R-III So.PemiscotCo. Callao SouthernReynoldsCoR-II Bonci PoplarBluff RipleyCo.R-IV NewMadridCoR-I SSDofSt. Louis Bosworth Slater UniversityCity Newburg Risco CrawfordCo.R-I Southland Ferguson-Florissant MariesCoR-II Dixon NormandySt.LouisPublic RiverviewGardensHickman Mills Hayti KansasCityCaruthersville Jennings CalhounGilliam Gorin Malta BendSpickardSwedeborg *MSIP5 accreditationstandardswillbeginFall2015

  7. WithMSIP5theProblemGetsWorse Current:14DistrictsProvisionally AccreditedandUnaccredited MSIP5: 27DistrictsProvisionally Accreditedand Unaccredited Unaccredited Provisional Lightershade= lowerpercentof pointsearned *MSIP5 accreditationstandardswillbeginFall2015

  8. TheProblemisStatewide The27DistrictsProvisionallyAccreditedandUnaccreditedare LocatedfromEast andSoutheasttoWestandNorthwest Lightershade= lowerpercentof pointsearned

  9. PovertyMatters DirectCorrelationBetweenPoverty&Accreditation %ofFree and/orReducedLunch/ Building AccreditationClassificationswithnew MSIP5

  10. ConsolidationImpactsAccreditation *MSIP5 standardswillbeginFall2015

  11. ConsolidationofLapsedDistricts Normandy:9 districtswoulddowngradetoprovisionallyaccredited; 3 districtswoulddowngradetounaccreditedwithin1year *MSIP5 standardswillbeginFall2015

  12. ConsolidationImpactsFinancialHealth 1RSMO162.202.Forpurposesofdeterminingtheproposedtaxratewhentwoormoreschooldistrictsareconsolidating,thetaxrateceilingoftheconsolidateddistrictshallbedeterminedbymultiplyingeachdistrict'stax rateceilingbyitstotalassessedvaluation,addingsuchproductsanddividingthesumbythecombinedassessedvaluationofthecomponentdistricts.

  13. ConsolidationImpactsStateAid Example:ParkwayStateAidCalculation CurrentParkway Parkway+Normandy WeightedAverageDailyAttendance(WADA) xStateAdequacyTarget x DollarValue ModifierStateFundingRequired 20,271 6,131 1.089 15,719 6,131 1.089 $ $ $ 135,345,559 $ 104,948,036 $ (130,686,671) $ 4,658,888.00 $ (130,686,671) $ - LessLocalEffort StateAid(if <),then0) $ StateAidperWADA $ - 229.83 559.7490 11,346,924 10,592,890 2,379,075 25,043,725 (22,664,650)

  14. 2013-2014 School Year Recommendation of Commissioner February 18, 2014 • State Board will take over financial operations of Normandy School District • Current Normandy students will remain in Normandy • Current transfers will remain in their current schools • Receiving school districts will receive their tuition

  15. 2014-2015 • FHSD • Current Enrollment • 20-25 new students • 380 returning students (approximately) • Placement Criteria • Return to the same building if there is space • Follow feeder pathway when possible • Maintain balance • NORMANDY • DESE transition team appointed to determine 2014-2015 plan (Due July 1, 2014)

  16. State Board Actions • Held statewide hearings to seek input on various plans • Conducted work session on February 10 • Shared Commissioner’s Plan (February 18, 2014) • Will seek feedback on Commissioner’s Plan • February 24 (Kansas City) • February 25 (St. Louis)

  17. Review Commissioner’s DRAFT Plan http://dese.mo.gov/divimprove/sia/msip/documents/MSIPUnaccreditedPlan.pdf http://dese.mo.gov/divimprove/sia/msip/documents/SummaryOfTiers.pdf • Commissioner’s Plan--Summary • Page 8 • Tier Summary

  18. Concerns

  19. Legislation Includes • 26 filed bills (approximately) • Appropriation of funds for 2013-14 • Tuition Caps • Accreditation classification systems • Assessment changes • Transportation determinations made by DESE • New Path to Excellence type concepts • Vouchers and Charters • Contractual agreements

  20. ANewPathtoExcellence MissouriEducationLeadersAgree • Everystudentmatters,everyschoolmatters,everycommunity matters • Transferringstudentsfromonelocationtoanotherdoesnotimprove schools,nordoesitrevitalizecommunities • Localcontrolbuilds strongcommunities • Earlyinterventionisessentialtoimproving schools • Schoolbuildingsandthechildrentheyserveshouldbethefocus rather thanschooldistricts • Schoolfundingshouldbespentonimproving instructionratherthan transportingstudents • Povertymatters • StrongerMissourischoolswillcomefromkeepingeverystudent, everyschoolandeverycommunityintact

  21. ANewPathtoExcellence • WasdevelopedbyschooladministratorsfromMASA,EducationPlus, CSDKansasCityandSouthwestCenter • Issupportedbysuperintendentsstatewide • Requires early,proactiveinterventionforstrugglingschools • Isfiscallysustainable,whichstudenttransfersarenot • Eliminatesinfluxofstudentsnotcurrentlyattendingpublicschools, maintainingcurrentlevelsoffundingfromthefoundationformula • Allows fundsto bespentoninstructionrather thantransportation • Stops forcedconsolidationofschooldistricts • Preservescommunities andneighborhoods,preventingisolationof familiesandcommunitiesfromschools • Isbroadlyapplicable to all schoolsanddistrictsstatewide

More Related