380 likes | 859 Views
Contribution of molecular methods in understanding microbial ecology of fermented sausages and dynamics during fermentation. Kalliopi Rantsiou and Luca Cocolin Faculty of Agriculture University of Turin, Italy. Molecular Biology.
E N D
Contribution of molecularmethods in understandingmicrobialecology of fermentedsausages and dynamicsduringfermentation Kalliopi Rantsiou and Luca Cocolin Faculty of Agriculture University of Turin, Italy
MolecularBiology • Study of the molecularbasis of biologicalactivity • Study of structure and function of cellularmacromolecules (DNA, RNA, proteins)
Milestones of MolecularBiology KaryMullis, 1983 1995 2001 Watson and Crick, 1953 Mendel, 1856-63 Griffith, 1928 1972 PCR DNA, hereditary material Inheritance of phenotypic traits Structure of DNA Molecular cloning Sequencing Haemophilusinfluenzae Human Genome Sequencing
Central Dogma of MolecularBiology Describes the flow of information in biological systems
Conventional vs. molecular • Phenotype • variable • interpretation of results • time • Genotype • constant • unequivocal identification • precise characterization
Species-specific PCR • Primershavebeendevelopedformain LAB and CNC speciesinvolved in meatfermantations • Targets: 16S rDNA, randomfragments (asidentifiedby RAPD), sodA, hsp-, lipase-encodinggenes • Identification of largenumber of isolates, presumptivetobelongtocertainspecies • Possibilitytodistinguishbetweencloselyrelatedspecies, difficultto separate byphenotype
PCR –D(T)GGE • Species-specificmigrationin PCR-DGGE allowsdirectidentification(bycomparisontoprofiles of knowncontrolstrains) or grouping of isolatesbased on profile and subsequentidentificationbyrDNAsequencing • applicationfor LAB, CNC aswellasyeasts, isolatedfromfermentedmeats
ISR-PCR • Study of the polymorphism of the 16S-23S IntergenicSpacerRegion (ISR) • applicationfor CNC • Combinedwithotheridentificationmethods
Characterization of isolates • Sub-speciescharacterization • todetermineintra-speciesbiodiversity (oftenwith the purpose of developingautochthonousstarters) • Study the performance of inoculated starter cultures
Characterization of isolates • RestrictionFragmentLengthPolymorphism (RFLP), plasmidprofile, PulsedField Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE) • PCR-based: RandomlyAmplifiedPolymorphic DNA (RAPD), RepetitiveExtragenicPalindromic (rep)-PCR
RFLP Identifiedmicrobial isolate fromfermentedproduct Isolate A isolate B isolate C
Mainfindings of characterizationmethods • Discrimination of strains with technologically relevant activities (for example, nitrate reduction, amino acid decarboxylase activity, temperature of growth)
Mainfindings of characterizationmethods • environmentalparametersselectforspecificbiotypes, whichprevail at the end of the fermentation–selectionpressure of a particularniche • plant-specificpopulations (may originate fromingredients and mayberesponsiblefor the sensorialcharacteristics of the finalproduct)
Mainfindings of characterizationmethods • identification of differentbiotypeswithin a starter culture and determination of the oneresponsiblefor the fermentation • Possibility to discriminate the added strains from those naturally present during the ripening of the product
Culture-independentmethodstostudymicrobialecology of fermentedmeats
Advantages of direct approaches • no cultivation takes place and therefore, the bias, associated with the use of conventional microbiological media for enumeration/isolation, is negated, • compared to the classic approach used so far in microbiology, that is based on isolation of strains from the food matrix and identification, either by physiological/phenotypical tests or by molecular methods, they are less time-consuming and require less effort, • they allow a parallel description of the populations of different microbial groups.
The use of RNA DNA may persist in any given environment, some times long after a microorganism is dead. In contrast, RNA is rapidly degraded after cell death and as a consequence, the application of RT-PCR-DGGE gives the fingerprint (or profiles) of alive and metabolically active populations
DNA RNA Cocolin et al. 2004, Appliedand EnvironmentalMicrobiology, 67, 5113-5121
rDNA: the mostcommonlyemployed target • Universal • Highlyconserved • regionsaswellasvariable • Largesequencedatabasesavailable
Application of PCR - DGGE Throughout the fermentationprocess–Populationdynamics Finalproduct–Biodiversity
Lactobacilluscurvatus Lactobacillus paracasei Rantsiou et al.2005 , Applied and EnvironmentalMicrobiology, 71, 1977-1986 Lactobacillussakei
Rantsiou et al. 2005, Applied and EnvironmentalMicrobiology, 71, 1977-1986
Comparison of finalproducts Silvestri et al. 2007, Meat science, 77, 413-423
Predominance of LAB in culture independentmethods Cocolin et al. 2009, Meat science, 82, 125-132
Yeastdynamics Rantsiou et al. 2005, Applied and EnvironmentalMicrobiology, 71, 1977-1986
Bacterialecologybyspecies-specific PCR • 12 sets of primersfor detection of 6 LAB and 6 CNC speciescommonlyencountered in fermentedmeatproducts • Application in the fermentedsausagehomogenate, before and after 24 hourenrichmentperiod (in MRS and Mannitol Salt broth) Aymerich et al. 2003, Applied and EnvironmentalMicrobiology, 69, 4583-4594
Quantification of Lactobacillussakeibyspecies-specificqPCR • Quantification of L.sakeiduringfermentation, without the need of cultivation • Applicationto 11 commercial samples of sausages and meat batter Martin et al. 2006, Applied and EnvironmentalMicrobiology, 72, 6040-6048
FinalConclusions • Unequivocal species identification • Possibilitytofollow a certainbiotypeduringfermentation • Biases of cultivation are by-passed • Possibilitytodetermine the metabolicallyactivepopulations