1 / 11

Kaleidoscope Charter School

Kaleidoscope Charter School. Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission Hennepin County Rush Creek Site #4 October 13, 2009 Fall 2009 Data Time tested: AM. In past 24 hours… Storm (heavy rain) Rain (steady) Showers (intermittent) Overcast Clear/Sunny Snowy. Now… Storm (heavy rain)

almira
Download Presentation

Kaleidoscope Charter School

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Kaleidoscope Charter School Elm Creek Watershed Management Commission Hennepin County Rush Creek Site #4 October 13, 2009 Fall 2009 Data Time tested: AM

  2. In past 24 hours… Storm (heavy rain) Rain (steady) Showers (intermittent) Overcast Clear/Sunny Snowy Now… Storm (heavy rain) Rain (steady) Showers (intermittent) Overcast Clear/Sunny Weather Temperature ReadingsTaken in the shade Water Temperature:0 CAir Temperature:7 C

  3. Water Appearance Water Odor Check one: • Clear • Blue-green • Green • Yellow • Brown • Milky • Check one: • None • Fishy • Musty • Rotten eggs • Septic

  4. Residential Commercial Agriculture Natural/Preserve Lawns Wooded Crop land Grazing land Feed lot Paved roads or bridges Unpaved roads Construction Recreational use Industrial Land fill Waste treatment plant Evidence of past alteration Local Land Useland use in local watershed within ¼ mile of site

  5. Check one: Rocky bottom Muddy bottom (Record the number of jabs taken in each habitat type) Vegetated bank margins 37 Snags and logs 44 Aquatic vegetation beds 30 Silt/Sand/Gravel substrate 26 Type of Sampling

  6. 1 0’1” 11 0’7” 2 0’3” 12 0’7” 3 0’4” 13 0’7” 4 0’4” 14 0’7” 5 0’5” 15 0’6” 6 0’3” 16 0’6” 7 0’5” 17 0’6” 8 0’6” 18 0’3” 9 0’6” 19 0’2” 10 0’7”20 0’2” 21 0’1” 31 0’6” 22 0’2” 32 0’6” 23 0’3” 33 0’6” 24 0’4” 34 0’6” 25 0’3” 35 0’6” 26 0’3” 36 0’6” 27 0’4” 37 0’6” 28 0’5” 38 0’7” 29 0’5” 39 0’7” 30 0’5” 40 0’5” Stream DepthMeasure the depth across the stream, from right bank to left bank in one-foot intervals for a minimum of 10 measurements

  7. Stream Width3 measurements in feet

  8. Measuring Stream Velocity Trial # • 13.05seconds 20 feet • 13.06seconds 20 feet • 14.71 seconds 20 feet • 17.97 seconds 20 feet • 12.32seconds 20 feet Average Time of Travel= Total Time divided by # of measurements 14.18 seconds Velocity= Distance divided by Average Time1.41 ft or meters/sec.

  9. River Bottom Composition and Embeddedness Average Embeddedness Average Embeddedness for the site: TOTAL (add all 10 together) 290/10=29.0%

  10. Macro-Invertebrates Identified

  11. What the findings mean to the watershed The macro-invertebrates we found and identified have a medium to high tolerance level. We found 21macro-invertebrates in the range of 0 to 4 tolerance level. We found 86macro-invertebrates in the range of 6 to 10. This could mean the quality of water at the time of testing is close to neutral, however the low tolerance level of 0 and 3 in three of our samples indicate low levels of pollution in Rush Creek.

More Related