80 likes | 89 Views
Army/Contractor Integrated Team: SED & SAIC Dick Stutzke SAIC Applied Technology Group 6725 Odyssey Drive Huntsville, Alabama 35806 19 November 2003 Presented at the 3 rd Annual CMMI Technology Conference & Users Group Meeting Denver, Colorado. Background.
E N D
Army/Contractor Integrated Team: SED & SAIC Dick Stutzke SAIC Applied Technology Group 6725 Odyssey Drive Huntsville, Alabama 35806 19 November 2003 Presented at the 3rd Annual CMMI Technology Conference & Users Group Meeting Denver, Colorado CMMI User 2003 (01OCT03)
Background • Players on Integrated Product Team • Customer: U.S. Army AMCOM SED • O2K/SCRS team: SAIC ATG (+ 30 subs) • BASES team: Westar (+ several subs) • Other: UAH • Mission • Develop and sustain software for tactical missiles and air vehicles • Some systems we support: MLRS, Bradley, Javelin, FAAD, UAV, and TMDE CMMI User 2003 (01OCT03)
Challenges • Diversity • Several domains (C2, trainers, fire control, aviation, etc.) • 11 HOLS • 50 Projects (new development, transition, sustainment) • Team size: 3-25 people • Build cycle: 3-18 months • IPT • SAIC • Subcontractors • Government • Competitive Contractors CMMI User 2003 (01OCT03)
Quality Management Board (Div. Chiefs + Program Mgrs) Quality Assurance Office Divisions Support Groups Process Groups Projects Org Chart SED Director Integrated Teams = Government and Contractor Employees CMMI User 2003 (01OCT03)
Analyze Conduct Kickoff Meeting Request Define Generate Technical Offer Approach Deliver Review Offer and Concur Offer Coordinate Writing of Plan(s) Review and Approve Plan(s) Monitor and Control Project Develop & Test Product(s) Review and Assess Progress Write Project Close-out Report Accept Product(s) SED Standard Process* CUSTOMER PROJECT LEAD PROJECT TEAM MANAGEMENT Initiate Request PM-1 PM-2 PM-3 ENG-1 PM-4 Review and Approve Offer PM-5 PM-7 PM-6 Obtain Resources PM-8 Write the Plan(s) ENG-2 PM-9 PM-10 Review Status PM-11 PM-13 ENG-3 PM-12 PM-14 Field Products ENG-4 PM-15 *Built on existing processes (CM, QA) CMMI User 2003 (01OCT03)
Process Improvement History • Sep ’91 First assessment • May ’94 Rated CMM Level 2 • Nov ’96 Rated CMM Level 3 • Apr ’00 Rated CMM Level 4 • Jan ’01 Defect Working Group formed • May ’02 CMMI migration plan • Jul ’02 Start CMMI training and planning • Sep ’02 Established partnership with SEI • Oct ’02 Revised process released • Jan ’03 Began beta testing defect database CMMI User 2003 (01OCT03)
Process Highlights: Participation • Totally integrated from day one • Supervisors include “process” in employee’s performance objectives • Every project has a free mentor (from Process Group) • QAO audits all projects • Annual Reports to QMB (process, QA, training) CMMI User 2003 (01OCT03)
Process Highlights: Training • Everyone has one or more Roles • Each Role has required Courses (Course/Role Matrix) • Metrics tracks who completes required courses • Training never stops CMMI User 2003 (01OCT03)