130 likes | 245 Views
The shipbuilding contract and the insufficient protection afforded by the 1952 Brussels Convention on the arrest of ships. Maurizio Dardani. The delivery of the vessel. a crucial moment for both parties The following legal consequences derive from delivery
E N D
The shipbuildingcontract and the insufficientprotectionafforded by the 1952 Brussels Convention on the arrest of ships Maurizio Dardani
The delivery of the vessel acrucial moment for both parties The followinglegalconsequences derive from delivery • The passage of title to the vessel • The right of the builder to claimpayment of the balance price • The exemption from liabilityexcept for the guarantee
Deliverable or non deliverable:the conflict of interests • The builder = to convince the buyer that the vessel hasbeencompleted and is ready for delivery • The buyer= to persuade the builder to eliminate allpossibledefects, even the minor defects, before the vessel istendered for delivery
The genuine interest of the buyer to take delivery of a vessel whichis immune from: • Major defects • Defectsaffectingclass • Defectsaffecting the intendedoperation of the vessel • Minor defects
Non genuine interest of the buyer (influenced by factorswhich are extraneous to the conditions of the vessel) • The market • The financialarrangements • The employment of the vessel
Anotherimportantlegalconsequencederiving from the delivery Onlyupon delivery the claims of the shipbuilderagainst the ownerbecomemaritimeclaims under the 1952 Brussels Convention on the arrest of ships
Article 1 l) of the Convention In this Convention the followingwordsshallhave the meaningsherebyassigned to them: 1. «Maritime claim» means a claimarising from one or more of the following: …………………. l) construction, repair or equipment of anyship or dock charges and dues;
Article 3 n. 1 of the Convention ………….a claimantmayarresteither the particularship in respect of which the marittime claimarose, or anyothershipwhichisowned by the personwhowas, at the time when the maritimeclaimarose, the owner of the particularship………
Twosituations • The vessel hasbeendelivered • The vessel hasnotbeendelivered and the contracthasbeenrescinded
Claims in case of delivery • Both the builder and the ownerhavemaritimeclaims • The builder can arrest the particularship in respect of whichhisclaimarose or a sister vessel of the sameowner • The owner can arrestanothershipowned by the builder by provingthat the claimarosewhen the particularshipwasstillproperty of the builder
Claims in case of non delivery • The claim of the builder for damagesderiving from the wrongfullrejection of the vessel • The claim of the owner for damagesderiving from the builder’sfailure to complete the vessel in time
1) Claims of the builder • the builder cannotarrestthe vessel in respect of which the claimarose • the builder cannotarrestanyother vessel owned by the sameshipownerbecausethey are notsistervesselswithin the meaning of article 3.n.1 of the Convention
2) Claims of the owner • The owner can arrest the vessel in respect of which the claimarose • The owner can arrestanothershipowned by the builder