70 likes | 153 Views
First Amendment. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
E N D
First Amendment Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqtET_tEr1Q http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript.html
In regards to what Mark Levin said, does the Constitution of the United States protect his right to free speech? Did he present any dangers to President Obama? • Advocacy of Illegal Action-unprotected by the First Amendment "words that are used that could present danger, which allows Congress to prevent those words from being used.” http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/advocacy_of_illegal_action
Did Mark Levin commit an act of violence against President Obama? • Fighting words- words that are inflammatory and may cause the hearer to immediately retaliate or breach the peace. • Fighting words are not protected by the First Amendment. • Example Chaplinksyv New Hampshire. http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/fighting_words
Did Mark Levin ruin President Obama’s reputation in this interview? • Libel-false or insulting injury of a good reputation, by print, writing, pictures, signs, or any communication by ruining his/her reputation in business or profession. • Slander- A false statement usually made orally, which insults another person. Unlike libel, damages from slander are not taken for granted, and must be proven by the party suing. http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/first_amendment
Based on what you have seen and learned, do you think Mark Levin had any scholarly ideas and values of his interpretation of President Obama? • Obscenity, three criteria: • 1- Does the work taken as a whole, appeal to a restless desire to persecute the individual or individuals. • 2- The work describes an offensive way, including sexual conduct. • 3- The work lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/obscenity
In groups of two-three explain in a paragraph your reasoning of how the Constitution may be interpreted if Mark Levin were to be sued by President Obama. In your groups come up with an example of the First Amendment, include vocabulary words in which you can justify that the Constitution would protect your rights to free speech.
GLE: PRINCIPLES OF THE REPUBLIC Knowledge of the principles expressed in documents shaping republic in the United States DOK_2, Standards SS1 1.6 Role of citizens and governments in carrying out constitutional principles. Explain the relevance and connection of constitutional principles in the following documents:1. U.S Constitution