60 likes | 169 Views
IEEE Coexistence Study Group. Recommendations to create a Coexistence Technical Advisory Group (CTAG) Organization Voting Rules of engagement Output. Proposed TAG Organization. CTAG voting members are from 11/15/16; WG voting rules. CTAG Voting. WG voting model
E N D
IEEE Coexistence Study Group • Recommendations to create a Coexistence Technical Advisory Group (CTAG) • Organization • Voting • Rules of engagement • Output Jim Lansford, Mobilian Corporation
Proposed TAG Organization CTAG voting members are from 11/15/16; WG voting rules Jim Lansford, Mobilian Corporation
CTAG Voting • WG voting model • One representative, one vote • Voters from .11, .15, .16 • Voting members + editor + chair determine majority • Majority opinion gets to write the leading sections • Minority opinion writes dissenting section • Chair voted on by ExComm • Under existing WG rules • Editor selected by attendees at TAG meeting • Nominations from chair or from the floor • TAG meetings completely open • Straw polls encouraged • Minutes and other documents to be posted on web site Jim Lansford, Mobilian Corporation
TAG Rules of Engagement (ROG) • TAG can be asked for an opinion by: • Chair, IEEE 802 • Majority of 802.11, 15, 16 chairs • Opinion can be initiated: • At beginning of standards process (PAR) • Before a letter or sponsor ballot Jim Lansford, Mobilian Corporation
TAG Output • TAG does not create a recommended practice • While rules permit it, CTAG will not write recommended practice documents • TAGs do not write standards • TAG does create a summary document • Outlines issues in coexistence problem • Majority opinion and recommendations • Minority opinion Jim Lansford, Mobilian Corporation
Summary • Fair representation from 802.11/15/16 • Recommends course of action to ExComm • During PAR evaluation, OR • Before letter/sponsor ballot • Gives 802 a venue to discuss/clarify/resolve coexistence issues with wireless standards in unlicensed bands Jim Lansford, Mobilian Corporation