191 likes | 359 Views
FP7-SPACE-2013-1-1-06 FAST Foreshore Assessment using Space Technology WP3 – Remote Sensing Daphne van der Wal (NIOZ, Yerseke ) with contributions from EU FAST partners. WP3 – Remote Sensing. Task 3.1 I dentify suitable DS/EO data and collect data (M1-36)
E N D
FP7-SPACE-2013-1-1-06 FAST Foreshore Assessment using Space Technology WP3 – Remote Sensing Daphne van der Wal (NIOZ, Yerseke) with contributions from EU FAST partners NIOZ is an institute of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO)
WP3 – Remote Sensing • Task 3.1 • Identify suitable DS/EO data and collect data (M1-36) • > Deliv 3.1: Proposed data service needs, .. (M3) • Task 3.2 • Identify ground referencing sites / field protocol (M1-4) • > Deliv 3.4: Ground sites / field protocol (M4): talk Iris • Task 3.3. • Deriving algorithms for foreshore identification (M19-M36) • Task 3.4. • Linking sediment dynamics to bed stability (M39-M45) • Task 3.5. • Delivery of data products for model input (M10-M36)
Task 3.1. Potential parameters Sentinel-1 Sentinel-2 (WP3 - RS) (WP4 - Field) Foreshore Elevation (intertidal) Elevation (dGPS) Sediment type Sediment (type/samples) Stabilisers: Seagrass, algae Seagrass, algae (cover/ chla) Saltmarsh vegetation Sedimentation/ erosion dynamics (SD sensors) Vegetation type? Vegetation type Vegetation structure and biomass LAI/NDVI Vegetation roughness? Wave attenuation Model rules and MISAFE (WP5)
Task 3.1: Indentification of main sources • DWH • Core services, DWH (GMES account) • Additional data DWH (no quota allocated, catalogue?) • GSC downstream services • ESA missions contributing to Copernicus (inclSentinel) • Third Party Missions contributing toCopernicus • Other data • Available at institutes • Other sources
Task 3.1: Criteria and special conditions • Criteria: • Spectral type and resolution • Spatial coverage (EU) and spatial resolution • Temporal extent and resolution (incid/freq/seasonal) • Data availability and costs • Special conditions: • Weather (clear sky for optical, no rain for radar) • Tide (low tide) and phenology
Sentinel-1a (C-band SAR): launched! https://directory.eoportal.org/web/eoportal/satellite-missions/c-missions/copernicus-sentinel-1
Sentinel-2 MSI forthcoming (April 2015) https://sentinel.esa.int/web/sentinel/user-guides/sentinel-2-msi/resolutions/spatial
Alternativesfor Sentinel-2 MSI Landsat Also SPOT5 (SWIR) Sentinel-2 Sentinel-2, also SPOT 5 (G,R,NIR) RapidEye/ Blackbridge WV2
Data needs: consistencybetweencountries andconsistencybetweenseasons/years
Data needs: HR spatial resolution Landsat 8, 30m (HR2) Formosat-2, 8m (HR1) Netherlands Landsat 8, 30m (HR2) Aerial photo
Data needs: HR1 spatialresolution RapidEye, 30 Sep 2011 L3 data resampledto 20 m L1 NITF data (6.5 m) Multiple archived (ESA) exists for all sites CORE03 SPOT5, 10m, 2.5 pan 31 Jan 2012
Wave attenuatingproperties of vegetation… LAI=0 LAI=0.5 LAI=1 LAI=3 • Dependency on vegetation type, season?
Task 3.1: Indentification of main sources Potential Potential, but restrictions No potential
Task 3.1: Indentification of main sources • DWH • Core services of some use • RapidEye/Blackbridge and SPOT from catalogue available?? • GSC downstream services • Biopar too coarse, synthesized or not for these areas • ESA missions contributing to Copernicus • Sentinel 1a • Sentinel 2 when available • Third Party Missions contributing toCopernicus • RapidEye/Blackbridge, SPOT, WV2 • in ESA/Copernicus archive; obtain through DWH or ESA proposal? • Other data • Landsat, free
WP3 Lookingahead: 2014 • Task 3.1 • Identify suitable DS/ EO data and collect data (M1-36) • > Data inventory (M3), done • > Collect data (e.g., matching field work), preprocess • Task 3.2 • Identify ground referencing sites / field protocol (M1-4) • > Field protocol, see talk Iris WP4 (M4) • > Short brochure, UCA (M8) • Task 3.3. • Deriving algorithms for foreshore identification (M19-M36) • > Divide tasks, field-rs-model compatibility, processing • Task 3.5. • Delivery of data products for model input (M10-M36)