190 likes | 352 Views
Interest Groups. Groups have a significant impact on policy Single-issue politics Interest groups Organized membership Pursuit of policy goals from shared interest of members. Background. Make profits, provide jobs, improve pay, or protect occupation
E N D
Groups have a significant impact on policy • Single-issue politics • Interest groups • Organized membership • Pursuit of policy goals from shared interest of members Background
Make profits, provide jobs, improve pay, or protect occupation • Property is “most common and durable source of factions” • Types: • Business • More than ½ • Size factor • Small groups are more united and oftentimes have more resources • Access to financial resources Economic groups
Active since 1930s • AFL-CIO • 9 million members • Only 1 in 8 workers unionized today Type I: Labor groups
Farm organizations • American Farm Bureau Federation • Do not always agree on policy issues • Specialty associations too Type II: Agricultural groups
AMA • ABA • AAUP Type III: Professional groups
Private goods are for an individual and can be withheld • Public goods are benefits to all • Leads to the free-rider problem • Irrational to contribute Private v. Public Goods
Organized interests formed to promote a cause that does not provide significant individual economic benefits Citizens’ groups
Public-Interest Groups • Less tangible benefits and more widely shared • LWV • Single-Issue Groups • Risen sharply in 30 years • Environmental groups (Sierra Club) • Ideological Groups • Broad agenda from philosophical or moral position • NOW • NAACP Types of Citizen Groups
Governments Lobby Each Other Governments
Economic • A: Economic activity provides organization with resources needed • A: Encouraged to join for economic benefits • D: May not support political efforts • Citizen • A: Support political • D: Must raise funds • D: Free-rider problem Economic v. Citizens
Make contact with officials • Huge industry—K Street • 20,000 in DC • Spend more than $1B annually • Must register Lobbying
Group efforts to develop and maintain close relationships with policymakers • Access does NOT equal influence • But… • Used to use money…now we use information • Congress • Fair play • Provide info, rely on allies, push steadily but not too aggressively • Executive Agencies • Formulation and implementation • Capture Theory • Courts • Judge selection • Law suits Inside Lobbying
Small and informal but relatively stable set of bureaucrats, legislators, and lobbyists who seek to develop policies beneficial to a particular interest • Group inside has an inside track • Relationships are iron clad Iron Triangle
Government agency • Administers program (IG) • Constituent services (C) • Interest groups • Lobby support (GA) • Election support (C) • Congressional subgroup • Budget/program support (GA) • Favorable legislation (IG) How Iron Triangle Benefits All…
Informal grouping of officials, lobbyists, and policy specialists who come together temporarily around a policy problem • Includes opposing interests Issue Networks
Bring constituency pressure to bear on policymakers • Grassroots lobbying • AARP • Votes • Reward friends, punish enemies • Send money • PAC • Ceiling is $10k per candidate • Voluntary contributions from members of employees • Eight times more money to incumbents than challengers • Why? Outside Lobbying
Organized interests are a source of good governance • But is there a “collective interest”? • Minorities can rule if interest group has most clout • Interest-group liberalism • Lowi • Support demands of interest group with special stake in policy • Weakens majority rule • Inefficient use of resources • Unequal distibution Pluralism
What do we learn from Tierney? Lots of info here… • What do we learn from the Schwarzenegger video? Thursday