340 likes | 493 Views
Proposed Design Methodology for shotcrete. W.C Joughin, G.C. Howell, A.R. Leach & J. Thompson. Research Workshop Team. William Joughin Graham Howell Tony Leach Jody Thompson Kevin Le Bron Karl Akermann (AngloPlatinum), Lars Hage (BASF), Alan Naismith, Julian Venter, Dave Ortlepp.
E N D
Proposed Design Methodology for shotcrete W.C Joughin, G.C. Howell, A.R. Leach & J. Thompson
Research Workshop Team • William Joughin • Graham Howell • Tony Leach • Jody Thompson • Kevin Le Bron • Karl Akermann (AngloPlatinum), Lars Hage (BASF), Alan Naismith, Julian Venter, Dave Ortlepp
Design Process • Determination of Shotcrete Requirements • Excavation requirements • Shotcrete function/purpose • Is it required? • Determination of rock mass and loading conditions • Rock mass classification • Stress modelling • Determination of Shotcrete Demand • Deadweight loading • Quasi-static loading • Dynamic loading • Determination of Shotcrete Capacity • Peak/Residual capacity • Energy absorption • Standard tests • Fibre content, mesh characteristics Determination of safety factor
Rock mass conditions • Q/GSI • Stress modelling
Shotcrete requirements(Excavation requirements) • Importance of excavation (access/production) • Exposure of personnel • Life of excavation • Functional dimensions of excavation • Maintenance and rehabilitation (redundancy)
Shotcrete requirements(Shotcrete function/purpose) • Structural support (Not covered) • Fabric between tendons to contain jointed/fractured rock • To prevent spalling/strainbursting near face
Shotcrete requirements(is it required?) • Observations of block size and stress damage • Keyblock analysis (eg Jblock) (joint controlled) • Stress damage (RCF>0.7, 1/c ratio) • Empirical charts (joint controlled + SRF)
Shotcrete Demand • Deadweight • Quasi-static • Dynamic
Shotcrete Demand (deadweight) Roof prism (Barret & McCreath) Sidewall prism slides Conservative estimate
Shotcrete Demand (quasi-static) • Assumption: Rock mass will continue to deform under quasi-static loading. Support pressures provided by shotcrete are inadequate to prevent deformation. • Objective is to survive the deformation and maintain the functions of containing the fractured rock mass • If the moment demand exceeds the peak moment capacity, the shotcrete will enter the residual state, providing it is reinforced.
Shotcrete Demand (quasi-static)(Displacement) • Displacement monitoring (extensometers) • Maximum displacement from Udec GRC modelling
Shotcrete Demand (Dynamic) • Sidewall: Kinetic Energy • Roof: Kinetic and potential energy • Roof Prism (Barret & McCreath
Shotcrete Capacity • Peak/residual strength • Energy Absorption • Standard tests (RDP/ASTMC1550, EFNARC) • Fibre content • Mesh area
Shotcrete Capacity (RDP) Peak load
Shotcrete Capacity (RDP) Generic
Shotcrete Capacity (on wall) 75mm thick, 1m tendon spacing 8.66 x 1.33 x
Shotcrete Capacity (on wall) 75mm thick, 1m tendon spacing
Outstanding work • Large scale panel tests (Kirsten & Labrum) • UDL & point load • Thickness (50mm, 100mm, 150mm) • Mesh & fibre • Large scale panel tests (Shotcrete working group – Gerhard Keyter)
Acknowledgements • Mine Health and Safety Council (SIM040204) • South Deep Gold Mine, Mponeng Mine, Impala 14# • BASF (Lars Hage), Mash (Hector Snashall) • Geopractica, University of the Witwatersrand • Seismogen (Tony Ward) • James Dube, Hlangabeza Gumede