The Office of Educator Quality

1. Effective Educator Evaluation Part 2: Missouri’s Model Educator Evaluation System The Office of Educator Quality Missouri Departmentof Elementary and Secondary Education Fall 2012

2. Acknowledgments • More than 3 years of work overall • Partners involved with the creation / development • 27 organization partners including • American Federation of Teachers of Missouri (AFT) • Missouri Association of Elementary School Principals (MAESP) • Missouri Association of Rural Education(MARE) • Missouri Association of School Administrators (MASA) • Missouri Association of Secondary School Principals (MASSP) • Missouri National Education Association (MNEA) • Missouri School Boards’ Association(MSBA) • Missouri State Teachers Association (MSTA) • 32 school district partners • 25 higher education partners • Over 170 districts involved in field-testing

3. Missouri Model Educator Standards Pilot Project Pilot Projects and Field-Testing of Quality Indicators

4. Developmental Timeline 2008-2010 Fall 2011 June 2012 2007 June 2011 2011-2012 July 2012

5. Theory of Action • Statutory Authority • Executive Summary • Essential Principles • Professional Frames and • Data Sources • Teacher Evaluation • Principal Evaluation • Superintendent Evaluation • Companion Documents • Research and Proven • Practices

7. Educator Evaluation System Webpage http://www.dese.mo.gov/eq/ees.htm Pilot Project Regional Orientation Meetings Supporting Documents Evaluation Instruments Research & Proven Practices

8. Missouri Theory of Action

9. Missouri Educator Evaluation System

10. Professional Frames Select one strand and indicator. Describe the “teacher actions” and how they might differ within each frame: commitment, practice, and impact.

11. Performance Targets Uhhmm…I’m gettin’ a feeling this could be a long day… Shooting at the right target

12. Educator Evaluation System Webpage http://www.dese.mo.gov/eq/ees.htm Pilot Project Regional Orientation Meetings Supporting Documents Teacher Evaluation Instrument Research & Proven Practices

14. Missouri Teacher Standards36 Quality Indicators

15. What does this mean for… • If the following standards are most prevalent, what would a principal and superintendent need to do to support this growth and development?

16. The Professional Continuum of the Teacher

17. The differences… • Standard 1, QI 1 • Identify and highlight the verbs in each strand. • Discuss the differences identified across levels.

18. Teacher Growth Guide 1.1 Standard 1: Content knowledge, including varied perspectives, aligned with appropriate instruction. The teacher understands the central concepts, structures, and tools of inquiry of the discipline(s) and creates learning experiences that make these aspects of subject matter meaningful and engaging for students. Quality Indicator 1: Content knowledge and academic language New Developing Proficient Distinguished

19. Missouri Educator Evaluation SystemProtocol You are here What impact? What new indicators? Recommended to focus only on 3 indicators THE PROCESS 0-7 Rating Growth Guides 0-7 Rating Growth Guides Coaches Peers Possible Sources of Evidence

20. Timeline for completion of the Teacher Evaluation Protocol

21. How does this process compare… • How does this recommended evaluation “timeline/process” compare to what you implement currently?

22. Educator Evaluation System Webpage http://www.dese.mo.gov/eq/ees.htm Pilot Project Regional Orientation Meetings Supporting Documents Principal Evaluation Instrument Research & Proven Practices

24. Missouri Leader Standards 13 Quality Indicators

25. The Professional Continuum of the Leader

26. Leader Growth Guide 3.1 Standard 3: Management of the Organizational Systems Education leaders have the knowledge and ability to ensure the success of all students by managing the organizational structure, personnel, and resources in a way that promotes a safe, efficient, and effective learning environment. Quality Indicator 1: Manage the Organizational Structure New Developing Proficient Distinguished

27. Missouri Educator Evaluation SystemProtocol You are here What impact? What new indicators? Recommended to focus only on 3 indicators THE PROCESS 0-7 Rating Growth Guides 0-7 Rating Growth Guides Coaches Peers Possible Sources of Evidence

28. Timeline for completion of the Principal Evaluation Protocol

29. Educator Evaluation System Webpage http://www.dese.mo.gov/eq/ees.htm Pilot Project Regional Orientation Meetings Supporting Documents Superintendent Evaluation Instrument Research & Proven Practices

31. Missouri Superintendent Standards 16 Quality Indicators

32. The Professional Continuum of the Superintendent

33. Superintendent Growth Guide 3.2 Standard 3: Management of the Organizational Systems Education leaders have the knowledge and ability to ensure the success of all students by managing the organizational structure, personnel, and resources in a way that promotes a safe, efficient, and effective learning environment. Quality Indicator 2: Lead Personnel New Developing Proficient Distinguished

34. Possible Evaluation Timeline

35. Educator Evaluation System Webpage http://www.dese.mo.gov/eq/ees.htm Pilot Project Regional Orientation Meetings Supporting Documents Teacher Evaluation Instrument Companion Documents

40. Educator Evaluation System Webpage http://www.dese.mo.gov/eq/ees.htm Pilot Project Regional Orientation Meetings Supporting Documents Teacher Evaluation Instrument Research and Proven Practices

42. Marzano Research & Proven Practices

43. Hattie Research & Proven Practices

44. Hattie Influences aligned to MO Indicators

45. Balanced Leadership

46. Balanced Leadership

47. Educator Evaluation System Webpage http://www.dese.mo.gov/eq/ees.htm Pilot Project Regional Orientation Meetings Supporting Documents Teacher Evaluation Instrument Ethics Statements

49. Educator Evaluation System Webpage http://www.dese.mo.gov/eq/ees.htm Pilot Project Regional Orientation Meetings FAQ’s Supporting Documents Teacher Evaluation Instrument Ethics Statements

50. Same question – different culture