1 / 13

Phone Con Minutes 08/09/2010 16:00-17:15 WP1 – Kickoff Participants:

Phone Con Minutes 08/09/2010 16:00-17:15 WP1 – Kickoff Participants: BASF: Herman Feise (left earlier), Thomas Letzelter TU BS: Harald Zetzener, Arno Kwade (later) UE: Jin Ooi, Subhash Thakur UTC: Piotr Frankowski, Martin Morgeneyer, Maria Paulick Zeppelin: Harald Wilms.

Download Presentation

Phone Con Minutes 08/09/2010 16:00-17:15 WP1 – Kickoff Participants:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. PhoneCon Minutes 08/09/2010 16:00-17:15 WP1 – Kickoff Participants: BASF: Herman Feise (left earlier), Thomas Letzelter TU BS: Harald Zetzener, Arno Kwade (later) UE: Jin Ooi, Subhash Thakur UTC: Piotr Frankowski, Martin Morgeneyer, Maria Paulick Zeppelin: Harald Wilms

  2. Agenda of the phonecon • Introduction, MM, 16:00-16:05 • Discussion of scientific approach, 16:05-16:15 • Discussion of experiments and simulations, 16:15-16:30 • Discussion of reference test materials, 16:30-16:40 • Discussion of milestones, 16:40-16:50 • Questions and conclusions, 16:50-17:15 * Indications in black reflect participants comments to the handout

  3. Overview

  4. Comments Overview • Perspectives I and II are at particle level, III and IV are at bulk level. It is suggested to also consider meso parameters (V) meso parameters already including cohesive forces • Some projects will only consider meso parameters • Meso group is to go beyond particle parameters without looking into bulk  saving time using just a few particles • Micro parameters are difficult to measure  Meso is a possible point to start  WP1 will also take into consider perspective V

  5. Particle Level • Effective parameters: • Repulsive force • Cohesion force • Friction force • Coefficient of restitution • Stiffness • Underlying properties: • Normal force • Shear force • Rolling / sliding friction • Coefficient of restitution • Particle size • Particle shape • Particle density • Stiffness • Particle roughness • Particle surface structure • … Focusing on effects

  6. Comments particle level • Normal force includes cohesive and repulsive forces and is somehow a force displacement behavior • the coefficient of restitution is important only in some applications such as conveying (but not when particle are already in contact, e.g. storage) • Particle surface structure, including its roughness, is important for cohesive material • Structure and roughness to estimate distances between particles and scattering of cohesive forces • Torsion and rolling friction might be negligible

  7. Bulk Level Effective bulk parameters: • Compressive strength, tensile strength • Scale information: porosity depending on normal stress (compaction) • Flow function • Anisotropy of flow function • Permeability • Size distribution • (Angle of repose) The participants agreed to always check the results (real world vs. virtual world) !

  8. Measurement Methods I

  9. Measurement Methods II

  10. Comments Measurement • UE: 3-4 AFM, available equipment to measure coefficient of restitution for small single particle using also a 45degree mirror • TU BS: set up for measurement of coefficient of restitution for spherical particles • List of equipment is established for UTC and TU BS, needs to be filled out for the other institutions  Please send your list to pardem@utc.fr • After having an overall list, decisions about what methods to use can be taken

  11. Materials

  12. Comments Material • Glass beads are ideal for the investigation of particle size influence • Aluminium oxide could be used for the investigation of shape influence • BASF and Zeppelin will send samples of the proposed material to make some basic tests in order to get a feeling for the material

  13. Comments on Milestones • Deliverables date to Brussels are going to be discussed and changed, e.g. state of the art of calibration in about 3-6 months from now. • Harald Wilms and Martin Morgeneyer, who lectured last week at the Vienna Summer School, would like to get a feedback to their lecture and would be available to give further presentations, e.g. on industrial view of powder problems

More Related