1 / 40

Online Treatment for Addictions

Online Treatment for Addictions. John Cunningham. What I’m interested in. How do people change their behaviour? What tools do clinicians use to motivate this change? Can these tools be applied in different settings to help motivate people who do not come to treatment?

anneliese
Download Presentation

Online Treatment for Addictions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Online Treatment for Addictions John Cunningham

  2. What I’m interested in • How do people change their behaviour? • What tools do clinicians use to motivate this change? • Can these tools be applied in different settings to help motivate people who do not come to treatment? • How do we demonstrate that these tools are effective?

  3. Why is this important? • Many people do not come to treatment • Waiting lists • Treatment dropout • Many people with gambling and other addictions concerns are interested in self-help materials

  4. Why the Internet? • Brief self-help interventions well suited to the Internet • Problem Gamblers (NODS past year probable pathological gambler) • 73% had home access to the Internet • Adult population, Ontario, Canada, 2007

  5. Why the Internet? • Why participants choose online help: • I have easy access to a computer (69%) • It is important to me to be able to access MM at any time of day (38%) • I like the privacy (38%) • It is easier for me to write about my feelings and experiences than to speak about them in front of a group (25%; Females = 35%, Males = 13%) • Online participation is easier than attending meetings due to my busy work schedule (23%)

  6. Why the Internet? • Online participation as a step to seeking treatment • Pathways disclosure model • No evidence that people are using Internet instead of treatment

  7. Today’s talk • What do they look like? • Alcohol intervention as main example • What evidence exists? • Research interludes • Note: My conflict of interest • Dr. Cunningham has acted as a paid consultant to V-CC Systems Inc., the owner of the Alcohol Help Center and the Check Your Gambling software.

  8. What do they look like? • Common elements: • Self-test to check levels of problems • Cognitive behavioural tools • Support group

  9. Check Your Gambling screener • www.CheckYourGambling.net • Screener Survey Contains: • Frequency of different gambling behaviours • CPGI • Amount of money spent on gambling • Gambling Cognitions Questionnaire • Demographics • Normative comparison data from Canadian Community Health Survey

  10. Research interlude • Evaluation of the Check Your Drinking screener

  11. Research designs • Research where program is given face-to-face • Problem – external validity • Studies where respondents are recruited over the Internet • Studies with no randomly assigned control group • Problem – low follow-up rates • Recruiting by email, mail, telephone • Problem – will the person access the intervention?

  12. Recruitment by telephone • Use RDD telephone survey to identify at-risk drinkers • Identify those who are hypothetically interested in an Internet program that provides a summary of the person’s drinking and compares it to the drinking of other Canadians • Home access to the Internet • Ask these people if they are interested in taking part in a study to help us revise and evaluate self-help materials • Send description and consent form • Randomly assign to receive or not receive intervention • Follow-up to assess differences at three-, six- and twelve-month follow-up

  13. Subject recruitment • RDD screening survey of 8,467 respondents • Excluded: • AUDIT-C < 4: 5,721 • Not interested in online self-help materials: 1,936 • No home internet: 100 • Did not agree to view consent form: 316 • Viewed consent form but did not sign and return: 209 • Randomized to condition: 185 • Complete 3 and 6 month follow-up data available for 91% of sample

  14. AUDIT > 11: Drinks per week 30% reduction in weekly drinking

  15. Issues running the study • One-third of people assigned to experimental condition are not accessing the website • Study becomes one testing the impact of providing access to the intervention

  16. Back to the content • The Alcohol Help Center • www.AlcoholHelpCentre.net or www.AlcoholHelpCenter.net Toolbox • Contains common cognitive behavioural and relapse prevention tools used in treatment and self-help books • Moderated Support Group

  17. Complexities with evaluations • Content is research-based, however: • Translating face-to-face interventions to an online format • Difference of participant behaviour in online and face-to-face settings

  18. Process research • How do people use online interventions? • Examples from online moderated support groups

  19. Research interlude • Online support groups as social support networks for problem drinkers

  20. Content of messages • The most common content (N = 647): • Introductions/greetings/thanks for support (30%) • General messages of encouragement (17%) • Questions about site/go to IM buddies (13%) • Specific suggestions/what worked for me (12%) • Experiencing urges/concern about future event (8%) • From support specialists: • General encouragement (17%) • Specific suggestions for what might help (18%)

  21. Summary • AHC just starting up • Does not appear to be self-sustaining as of yet • Discussions clustered around ‘nodes’ of one or two active users • Support staff playing essential role • Keeping discussions active by ‘seeding’ • Providing support when others not online • High quality content

  22. Research interlude • How quickly do people respond?

  23. SSC Support Group

  24. Methods • StopSmokingCenter.net (SSC) version 5.0 • Lifecycle of version 5.0: Nov 6 2004 – May 15, 2007 • 16,764 registrations • 15% post on the support group

  25. How long does it take to get a reply? • 25% of first posts have a reply within 12 minutes • 50% of first posts have a reply within 29 minutes • 75% of first posts have a reply within 1 hour 27 min • 81.8% of replies by members, rest by moderator • only 68/2562 did not get a reply at all.

  26. What’s next? • More research • Understanding why these interventions work • What other tools might be helpful?

  27. New tools • Tools to promote engagement • Text messages and emails • Personal Profile • YouTube Videos • Blogs

  28. Collaborators and Funding • Collaborators: Joanne Cordingley, David Hodgins, Keith Humphreys, Anja Koski-Jännes, Trevor van Mierlo, Cameron Wild • Sources of Funding: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health Canadian Institutes of Health Research National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre V-CC Systems Inc. Contact: John_Cunningham@camh.net

More Related