380 likes | 620 Views
AS INCOME RISES, CONSUMPTION RISES, BUT NOT AS QUICKLY. AVERAGE PROPENSITY TO CONSUME. PERCENTAGE OF DI SPENT. PERCENTAGE OF DI SAVED. APC? 0.9375 93.75% IS SPENT TO SERVICES & GOODS APS? 0.0625 6.25% OF HIS INCOME GOES TO HIS SAVINGS APC + APS = 1.
E N D
AVERAGE PROPENSITY TO CONSUME PERCENTAGE OF DI SPENT PERCENTAGE OF DI SAVED
APC? • 0.9375 • 93.75% IS SPENT TO SERVICES & GOODS APS? • 0.0625 • 6.25% OF HIS INCOME GOES TO HIS SAVINGS • APC + APS = 1
IS IT POSSIBLE TO HAVE AN APC GREATER THAN 1? • WHAT DOES 1 SUGGEST? • YOU SPEND BEYOND YOUR MEANS. YOU SPEND MORE THAN YOUR INCOME • NO SAVINGS!
AS INCOME RISES, CONSUMPTION RISES (BUT BY LESS THAN DOES INCOME)C MPC? 4,000 / 3,000 = 1.33
AS INCOME RISES, BOTH CONSUMPTION AND SAVING WILL RISE MPS? SOLVE FOR SAVINGS FIRST: 8,000 -7,000 = 1,000 1,000/ 3,000 = .33
SIGNIFICANCE OF “C” CROSSING THE 45* LINE? CONSUMPTION < DI CONSUMPTION > DI MPC? = DI IS FROM 6 TO 8 DI = FROM 6 8 C? 5.5 7 1.5/2 = 0.75 CONSUMPTION SCHEDULE
SAVING FUNCTION INCOME BELOW 4? = DISSAVING DISSAVING = SAVING BELOW 0 DI = C + S DI – S = C DI – C = S FIND C & S IF DISPOSABLE INCOME IS 2 C= 2.5 S= -.5
AUTONOMOUS CONSUMPTION ? LEVEL OF CONSUMPTION WHEN DISPOSABLE INCOME IS 0 PEOPLE WILL SPEND A CERTAIN AMOUNT ON THE NECESSITIES OF LIFE EVEN WITHOUT INCOME
INDUCED CONSUMPTION ? INDUCED = INFLUENCE/ PERSUADE AS DISPOSABLE INCOME RISES, INDUCE CONSUMPTION ALSO RISES CAN A DISPOSABLE INCOME OF 0 INDUCE CONSUMPTION? AS DISPOSABLE INCOME FALLS, INDUCE CONSUMPTION ALSO FALLS CONSUMPTION = AUTONOMOUS CONSUMPTION + INDUCED CONSUMPTION C = AC + IC C – AC = IC C - IC = AC
AUTONOMOUS CONSUMPTION ? INDEPENDENT OF DISPOSABLE INCOME LEVEL OF CONSUMPTION WHEN DISPOSABLE INCOME IS 0 AUTONOMOUS CONSUMPTION IS 40 INDUCED CONSUMPTION C = AC + IC IC? IF 360 IS C IC = 320
THINGS THAT DON’T LAST LONG NONDURABLES
SERVICES set of actions that are performed to provide a set of outcomes for consumer’s satisfaction INTANGIBLE
DETERMINANTS OF THE LEVEL OF CONSUMPTION • DISPOSABLE INCOME • CREDIT AVAILABILITY • STOCK OF LIQUID ASSETS IN THE HANDS OF THE CONSUMERS • STOCK OF DURABLE GOODS IN THE HANDS OF CONSUMERS • KEEPING UP WITH THE JONESES • CONSUMER EXPECTATIONS
AT VERY LOW INCOME LEVELS, PEOPLE ACTUALLY DISSAVE PRICE OF CONSUMPTION YOUR DAILY NEEDS DON’T CHANGE TO MEET YOUR DAILY NEEDS, YOU BORROW CREDIT OR YOU’LL GO TO YOUR SAVINGS
LENDER: (CREDO/ BELIEVES) LENDS RESOURCES ENTRUSTING: LATER PAYMENTS DEBTOR: BORROWER CREDIT AVAILABILITY: WHEN CREDIT IS EASED, PEOPLE TEND TO BORROW MORE CREDIT AVAILABILITY VARIES INVERSELY WITH THE LEVEL OF CONSUMER DEBT. THE MORE YOU OWE, THE LESS CREDIT AVAILABLE
STOCK OF LIQUID ASSETS IN THE HANDS OF THE CONSUMERS OWNED THINGS THAT CAN BE QUICKLY TURNED INTO CASH
33 million shares of facebook’s stock and the price of the stock rises to 35? 1.15 billion richer at least on paper Brokers will encourage you to invest your money on other shares WOLF OF WALLSTREET: COMMISSION ON EACH INVESTOR THEY GET
SALES OF DURABLE GOODS VARY INVERSELY WITH THE STOCK OF CONSUMER DURABLES IN THE HANDS OF THE CONSUMERS WHEN PEOPLE HOLD A LARGE STOCK OF CONSUMER DURABLES, CONSUMER DURABLE SALES TEND TO BE LOW
SIM CARD COSTS P 1,000 1999 = 3210 costs P10, 000
AFTER 15 YEARS = NOKIA LUMIA COSTS P7, 900 WHEN PEOPLE HOLD A LARGE STOCK OF CONSUMER DURABLES, CONSUMER DURABLE SALES TEND TO BE LOW AFTER 15 YEARS = MY PHONE AGUA COSTS P2, 988
CONSPICUOUS STANDING OUT SO AS TO BE CLEARLY VISIBLE
KEEPING UP WITH THE JONESES IF WE DON’T BUY IT, WE WON’T BE KEEPING UP
CONSUMER EXPECTATION WHEN INFLATION IS EXPECTED, PEOPLE BUY MORE WHEN RECESSION IS EXPECTED, PEOPLE BUY LESS
ESTIMATING FUTURE EARNINGS UNTIL ONE RETIRES PERMANENT INCOME HYPOTHESIS Income is greater than consumption during the middle ages (30-50) PEOPLE GEAR THEIR CONSUMPTION TO THEIR EXPECTED EARNINGS MORE THAN TO THEIR CURRENT INCOME
496 X 2 = 992, 000 992, 000 – 496, 000 = 496, 000 (REMAINING BALANCE)
10, 522 X 60 MONTHS 631, 320 – 496, 000 135, 000 INTEREST HOW CERTAIN ARE YOU THAT YOU WILL NOT INCUR OTHER ADDITIONAL/ EMERGENCY EXPENSES WITHING THE NEXT 5 YEARS?