1 / 27

Pat Langley School of Computing and Informatics Arizona State University Tempe, Arizona

Computational Assistance for Systems Biology of Aging. Pat Langley School of Computing and Informatics Arizona State University Tempe, Arizona. Thanks to D. Bidaye, J. Difzac, J. Furber, S. Kim, S. Racunas, N. Shah, J. Shrager,

annis
Download Presentation

Pat Langley School of Computing and Informatics Arizona State University Tempe, Arizona

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Computational Assistance for Systems Biology of Aging Pat Langley School of Computing and Informatics Arizona State University Tempe, Arizona Thanks to D. Bidaye, J. Difzac, J. Furber, S. Kim, S. Racunas, N. Shah, J. Shrager, D. Stracuzzi, and M. Verdicchio for their contributions to this research, which was funded in part by a grant from Science Foundation Arizona.

  2. The Complexity of Human Aging There is mounting evidence that aging involves many interacting mechanisms, including: Mutation of mitochondrial DNA Accumulation of lipofuscin in lysosomes Protein crosslinking in extra-cellular matrix Cell senescence and cell loss The daunting complexity of modeling these and other processes suggests the need for computational assistance.

  3. Furber’s Network Diagram of Aging

  4. Furber’s diagram offers a good step toward a systems biology of aging, but it remains: Challenges for a Systems Biology of Aging • Informal, in that the meanings of the diagram’s nodes and links are imprecise; • Inert, in that it needs a human interpreter to produce model explanations or predictions; and • Static, in that the model cannot be updated or revised over time without considerable effort. In this talk, I present some computational responses to these three challenges that build on Furber’s work.

  5. An Initial Modeling Environment

  6. We want a notation for models of aging that is precise enough for a digital computer. Computational biology is rife with candidate formalisms, but most are problematic: Formal Representation of Aging Processes • Differential equations require functional forms and parameters • Boolean networks assume discrete, not continuous, variables • Bayesian networks require arbitrary probabilistic parameters We need a notation that makes closer contact with biologists’ ideas about aging mechanisms. Kuipers’ (1986) qualitative modeling formalism offers many of the features that we desire.

  7. We can state a model as a set of qualitative elements, each of which specifies: Qualitative Causal Models of Aging • Places in the cell (e.g., lysosome, cytoplasm) • Quantities that are measured in a place • For unstable entities (e.g., ROS, Fe) • For stable entities (e.g., oxidized proteins, lipofuscin) • Causal influences between quantities • Increase/decrease of one quantity with another • Increase/decrease of quantity’s rate of change Each influence describes a qualitative causal link between two quantitative variables.

  8. Time A Formal Lysosome Model – + + junk-protein junk-protein + Lysosome Cytoplasm Fe – + + + ROS membrane-damage + + lipofuscin oxidized-protein + lipofuscin lytic-enzyme – + H202 H202

  9. > load “lyso.lisp” loaded “lyso.lisp” > show places entities • Places: • p1: cell • p2: lysosome in the cell • p3: cytoplasm in the cell • Quantities: • q0: time • q1: junk-protein in the lysosome • q2: junk-protein in the cytoplasm • q3: fe in the lysosome • q4: ros in the lysosome • q5: oxidized-protein in the lysosome • q6: lipofuscin in the lysosome • q7: lipofuscin in the cytoplasm • q8: lytic-enzyme in the lysosome • q9: damaged-membrane in the lysosome • q10: h2o2 in the lysosome • q11: h2o2 in the cytoplasm Examining the Lysosome Model

  10. > show claims Claims: c1: junk-protein in the lysosome decreases with time c2: junk-protein in the cytoplasm increases with time c3: junk-protein in the lysosome increases with junk-protein in the cytoplasm c4: fe increases with junk-protein in the lysosome [lysosome digestion produces fe from junk proteins] c5: ros increases with fe in the lysosome c6: oxidized-protein increases with ros in the lysosome [ros oxidizes proteins to produce oxidized proteins] c7: lipofuscin increases with oxidized-protein in the lysosome [oxidized-proteins and fe crosslink to form lipofuscin] c8: c2 decreases with lipofuscin in the lysosome [lipofuscin reduces the rate of disassembling junk proteins] c9: lytic-enzyme decreases with lipofuscin in the lysosome c10: ros increases with lipofuscin in the lysosome c11: damaged-membrane increases with ros in the lysosome c12: lipofuscin in the cytoplasm increases with damaged-membrane in the lysosome [damaged lysosomal membranes spill lipofuscin into cytoplasm] c13: h2o2 in the lysosome increases with h2o2 in the cytoplasm Examining the Lysosome Model

  11. A systems model of aging is lacking unless one can relate it to observable phenomena. Such an account should let one answer questions like: Reasoning About Aging Models • What biological effects does the model predict? • What observations/experiments does the model explain? • What portions of the model explain a given phenomenon? • How would changes to the model alter its predictions? Model complexity can make these difficult to do manually, but we can provide computational support for such reasoning.

  12. Before one can relate a model’s predictions to observations, we must represent them both. Our environment uses a notation similar to model claims: Encoding Predictions and Observations • A quantity increases with another quantity • E.g., lipofuscin in the lysosome increases with time • A quantity decreases with another quantity • E.g., lytic-enzyme decreases with ROS in the lysosome • A quantity does not change with another quantity • E.g., H2O2 does not vary with ROS in the lysosome Note: These describe phenomena that the model does or should predict; they are not part of the model themselves.

  13. > show facts Facts: f1: lipofuscin in the lysosome increases with time f2: lipofuscin in the cytoplasm increases with time f3: lytic-enzyme decreases with ros in the lysosome f4: h2o2 does-not-change with ros in the lysosome Examining Facts, Queries, and Predictions

  14. > show facts Facts: f1: lipofuscin in the lysosome increases with time f2: lipofuscin in the cytoplasm increases with time f3: lytic-enzyme decreases with ros in the lysosome f4: h2o2 does-not-change with ros in the lysosome > does lytic-enzyme change with ros in the lysosome ? p1: lytic-enzyme decreases with ros in the lysosome > does oxidized-protein change with h2o2 in the lysosome ? p2: oxidized-protein does-not-change with h2o2 in the lysosome Examining Facts, Queries, and Predictions

  15. > show facts Facts: f1: lipofuscin in the lysosome increases with time f2: lipofuscin in the cytoplasm increases with time f3: lytic-enzyme decreases with ros in the lysosome f4: h2o2 does-not-change with ros in the lysosome > does lytic-enzyme change with ros in the lysosome ? p1: lytic-enzyme decreases with ros in the lysosome > does oxidized-protein change with h2o2 in the lysosome ? p2: oxidized-protein does-not-change with h2o2 in the lysosome > predict f1 f2 f3 f4 f1: lipofuscin in the lysosome increases with time the model makes ambiguous predictions. f2: lipofuscin in the cytoplasm increases with time the model makes ambiguous predictions. f3: lytic-enzyme decreases with ros in the lysosome p3: the model predicts the same relation. f4: h2o2 does-not-change with ros in the lysosome p4: the model predicts the same relation. Examining Facts, Queries, and Predictions

  16. Given a qualitative query about the relation between two model quantities, the environment: Generating Model Predictions • Chains backward from dependent term D to find all paths that connect it with independent term I. • If no paths exist, then it predicts no empirical relationship. • If a path has an even number of decreases links, it predicts D increases with I, else that D decreases with I. • Provides a definite relationship if all path predictions agree. • Notes an ambiguous relationship if path predictions disagree. The same form of qualitative reasoning predicts both changes over time and responses to experimental manipulation.

  17. Time Conflicting Model Pathways – + + junk-protein junk-protein + Lysosome Cytoplasm Fe – + + + ROS membrane-damage + + lipofuscin oxidized-protein + lipofuscin lytic-enzyme – + H202 H202

  18. Biologists should also be able to extend and revise models of aging easily and efficiently. Our environment lets users alter the current model interactively in five basic ways: Altering a Qualitative Model of Aging • Adding a new place, quantity, claim, or fact • Adding a note (e.g., a URL) to a claim or fact • Removing a place, quantity, claim, or fact • Disabling or enabling a claim or fact • Saving revisions to a file that can be loaded later Some changes can alter the model’s implications and its ability to explain observed results.

  19. > predict f1: lipofuscin in the lysosome increases with time the model makes ambiguous predictions. f2: lipofuscin in the cytoplasm increases with time the model makes ambiguous predictions. f3: lytic-enzyme decreases with ros in the lysosome p3: the model predicts the same relation. f4: h2o2 does-not-change with ros in the lysosome p4: the model predicts the same relation. Examining the Effects of Model Revision

  20. > predict f1: lipofuscin in the lysosome increases with time the model makes ambiguous predictions. f2: lipofuscin in the cytoplasm increases with time the model makes ambiguous predictions. f3: lytic-enzyme decreases with ros in the lysosome p3: the model predicts the same relation. f4: h2o2 does-not-change with ros in the lysosome p4: the model predicts the same relation. > disable c1 [junk-protein in the lysosome decreases with time] Examining the Effects of Model Revision

  21. > predict f1: lipofuscin in the lysosome increases with time the model makes ambiguous predictions. f2: lipofuscin in the cytoplasm increases with time the model makes ambiguous predictions. f3: lytic-enzyme decreases with ros in the lysosome p3: the model predicts the same relation. f4: h2o2 does-not-change with ros in the lysosome p4: the model predicts the same relation. > disable c1 [junk-protein in the lysosome decreases with time] > predict f1: lipofuscin in the lysosome increases with time p5: the model predicts the same relation. f2: lipofuscin in the cytoplasm increases with time p6: the model predicts the same relation. f3: lytic-enzyme decreases with ros in the lysosome p7: the model predicts the same relation. f4: h2o2 does-not-change with ros in the lysosome p8: the model predicts the same relation. Examining the Effects of Model Revision

  22. Our computational assistant is still under development, but the system already lets users: Status of the Interactive System • Load, examine, and alter a qualitative model of aging • Answer queries about how one quantity affects another • Compare the model’s predictions to observed facts • Determine effects of model revisions on predictions Also, we have an initial encoding for the lysosomal portion of Furber’s network diagram. We have much work ahead of us, but we also have the basic machinery and a partial knowledge base in place.

  23. Initial users of our interactive modeling system are likely to be individual biologists or laboratories. However, a Web-based version would benefit the distributed aging research community, which could use it to: Support for the Aging Research Community • Store shared beliefs about aging phenomena and processes • Exchange new observational facts and propose hypotheses • Update the community model of aging incrementally The system would serve as a ‘graphical wiki’ that organizes knowledge, directs discussion, and grows over time. However, content would consist of formally stated models and phenomena, rather than documents.

  24. Our approach to computational biological aides incorporates ideas from many traditions: Intellectual Influences • formalizations of biological knowledge (e.g., EcoCyc, 2003) • qualitative reasoning and simulation (e.g., Kuipers, 1986) • languages for scientific simulation (e.g., STELLA, PROMETHEUS) • Web-supported tools for biological visualization (e.g., KEGG) • Web-based tools for biological processing (e.g., BioBike, 2007) However, it combines these ideas in novel ways to assist in the construction of system-level models of aging.

  25. Our effort is still in its early stages, and we need further work to: Directions for Future Research expand our encoding of aging events and processes formalize more content from Furber’s network diagram provide a graphical interface for viewing and using models make the system accessible remotely using the Web support community-based development of models evaluate the software’s actual usability for biologists Together, these changes should make our interactive system a powerful computational aid for aging researchers.

  26. In summary, we are developing an interactive computational aid for systems biology of aging that supports: Key Contributions • Formal models of aging that specify clear relationships among known biological quantities; • Interpretable models that let a computer predict and explain known phenomena; and • Revisable models that users can evaluate, update, and revise with little training and effort. The system is still immature, but a more advanced version would offer many benefits to the aging community.

  27. End of Presentation

More Related