140 likes | 325 Views
EAR manual & Recommendation Joint Degrees. Jenneke Lokhoff Bridge Conference, Malta 18 October 2012. Content. Context EAR manual Recommendation Joint Degrees. Wreck-It Ralph. Message of today : Recognition of Joint Degrees. Back it Don’t wreck it. Content. EAR Manual
E N D
EAR manual & Recommendation Joint Degrees Jenneke Lokhoff Bridge Conference, Malta 18 October 2012
Content • Context • EAR manual • Recommendation Joint Degrees
Message of today:Recognition of Joint Degrees Back it Don’twreckit
Content • EAR Manual • Recommendationon joint degrees
Lisbon Recognition Convention WG y Study 2 WG α Practical implementation? Project w Journal article x Subsidiary texts Working GroupY Recommendations z project ¥ WG3 Results project y Recommendations z Recognition instruments E ? A ? C ? B ? D?
EAR projectEuropeanArea of Recognitionmanual • Practical implementation of LRC basedonexistinggoodpractice • ENIC-NARIC networks • Interest otherregions (Asia Pacific, Africa) • Included as recommendation in Bologna Bucharest Communiqué 2012 • Follow up projects
EAR manual • Content EAR Manual: • Schematic outline • 16 practical chapters: • Flowchart • Introduction • Recommendation • Examples • Sources and RCP
Recognitionprocess 1 Information and receipt 2 Verification completeness file • Is the institution/programmeauthorized to awardqualifications? 3 Verification institution and/or programme 4 Verification documents 5 Assessment qualifications 6 Outcome of assessment 7 Communication result procedure
Recommendationfor joint degrees (1) General: • Recognizelikeanyotherdegree • Look forsufficientproof of quality (anchor) to recognize the degree
Recommendationfor joint degrees (2) Recommended to check: • All institutions in joint programmewererecognized and/oraccredited in their home systems • Joint programmerecognizedby all participatinghighereducationinstitutions? • What are legalregulations in countriesinstitutionsinvolved
3 Systems: • Recognition • Recognition + ProgrammeAccreditation • ProgrammeAccreditation (norecognition) Examples • Example 1 – Consortium: • Recognized (system 1 ) • Recognized (system 1 ) • No programmeaccreditation (system 3 ) • Example 2 – Consortium: • No programmeaccreditation (system 3 ) • No programmeaccreditation (system 3 ) • Notrecognized (system 1 ) • Example 3 – Consortium: • No programmeaccreditation (system 3 ) • No programmeaccreditation (system 3 ) • No programmeaccreditation (system 3 )
Lastly… • Grey areas.. • Case by case • Look forquality anchor
Back it – Don’twreckit Thankyouforyourattention! www.eurorecognition.eu Questions? Please contact: Ms Lucie de Bruin: lbruin@nuffic.nl Ms Jenneke Lokhoff: jlokhoff@nuffic.nl