1 / 12

Statewide Single-Family Rebate Program Evaluation: Lighting

Statewide Single-Family Rebate Program Evaluation: Lighting. CALMAC/MAESTRO Meeting San Francisco, CA July 26, 2006 Tami Rasmussen tami.rasmussen@kema.com. Overview of Presentation. Program background Recent evaluation results that pertain to lighting CFL Metering Study

april
Download Presentation

Statewide Single-Family Rebate Program Evaluation: Lighting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Statewide Single-Family Rebate Program Evaluation: Lighting CALMAC/MAESTRO Meeting San Francisco, CA July 26, 2006 Tami Rasmussen tami.rasmussen@kema.com

  2. Overview of Presentation • Program background • Recent evaluation results that pertain to lighting • CFL Metering Study • Consumer and supplier lighting market characterization • 2004-2005 program evaluation scope

  3. Single-Family Rebate Program: Lighting component background • Statewide program: PG&G, SDG&E, So Cal Gas, SCE • 1998 market transformation initiative - California Residential Lighting and Appliance Program • 2001 resource acquisition focus: over 8 million CFL product incentives • 2002-2003 Statewide Crosscutting Residential Lighting Program – 4 million CFL product incentives per year

  4. Single-Family Rebate Program: Lighting component background • 2004-2005 Statewide Single-Family Retrofit Program • 10 million CFL product incentives per year (procurement funding accounts for half) • 92% of energy savings goals met through lighting measures

  5. CFL Metering Study – Objective and Approach • Update CFL energy savings parameters • Monitor interior fixtures with CFLs to obtain time-of-use data • Sample frame: CA residents with CFLs installed, 7 regional strata from San Diego to Chico • Sample size: 375 homes, 891 interior fixtures, 983 CFLs • Monitoring: on/off time and date stamp light meters; 6-12 months of metering from June 2003 – October 2004

  6. CFL Metering Study – Results • Average hours of use: 2.3 hours per day for interior fixtures • No different from standard lighting usage (based on 1997 HMG study) • Drivers of variation: • Room type • Fixture and control type • CFL vintage • Usage peaks between 8 and 9pm; less than 10% of CFLs operate during summer weekday afternoons

  7. Lighting Market Characterization – Objectives and Approach • 2002 Statewide Crosscutting Residential Lighting Program evaluation • Update prior consumer and supplier lighting market characterizations • 1000 residential population surveys (split evenly between CFL purchaser/non-purchaser) conducted in June 2003 • 50 market actor interviews conducted in June 2003

  8. Lighting Market Characterization – Key Consumer Findings

  9. Lighting Market Characterization – Key Supplier Findings • Prices have declined – wholesale below $1, retail between $2-$3 (down from $6 in 2001) – most manufacturers expect prices to decline further • Product diversity has increased – more manufacturers in the market; more designs, shapes and sizes of CFLs; elimination of objectionable features such as oversized bulbs, poor light quality, color rendering

  10. Lighting Market Characterization – Key Supplier Findings, continued • Most products are ENERGY STAR certified • Expectations for increased sales in the future due to declining price and expanding diversity

  11. 2004-2005 Single-Family Program Evaluation Scope: Lighting • Consumer CFL survey (CFL purchaser and non-purchasers) • Interviews with lighting retailers, manufacturers and stakeholders • Process evaluation • Gross impact assessment (on-site surveys with CFL purchasers from 2004-2005) • CFL Net-to-gross assessment (TBD – may include a combination of approaches)

  12. Full reports available at www.calmac.org CFL Metering Study: www.calmac.org/publications/2005_Res_CFL_Metering_Study_Final_Report.pdf Evaluation of the 2002 Statewide Crosscutting Residential Lighting Program: www.calmac.org/publications/2002_Statewide_Res_Lighting_Final_Report.pdf

More Related