1 / 21

Final Presentation

Final Presentation. Team leader Wayne Stevens. Group members: Drew Kelly, Stephen Glossner , Jason Gerber. Organization. Morehead State University More specifically the AET department. Mission and Vision.

apu
Download Presentation

Final Presentation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Final Presentation Team leader Wayne Stevens. Group members: Drew Kelly, Stephen Glossner, Jason Gerber

  2. Organization • Morehead State University • More specifically the AET department.

  3. Mission and Vision • The AET department at MSU has a “vision to satisfy the desire and need to understand technology , and to be an educational leader in engineering technology and industrial education. Committed to a life long learning and professional needs of MSU constituents”. • MSU has many accreditations that can be found at http://www.moreheadstate.edu/accreditation/ • ATMAE and SME

  4. Goals of AET department • To prepare problem solvers for professional leadership roles. • To provide and support an environment conducive to research and development and the dissemination of technological knowledge and innovation. • And to dynamically influence economic development within the university’s service region.

  5. TQM at Morehead • Quality in education has become a huge concern for many across America • Quality Management in America deals with three A’s: • Accountability • Alignment • Assessment

  6. TQM at Morehead • We met with Dr. Zargari and got information on classes covering IET, ITCD, and ITCM. • We performed a study and put the information into Pareto Graphs to show size of classes.

  7. IET Department Table 1: IET Fall Class Size

  8. Fall IET Class Pareto Chart Figure 1: Size of IET Classes

  9. Fall IET Classes • The chart shows that IET- 110, 120, 300, 317, 419 classes are larger in size.

  10. ITCD Classes Table 2: ITCD Fall Class Size

  11. Fall ITCD Class Pareto Chart Figure 2: Size of ITCD Classes

  12. Fall ITCD Classes • The three ITCD classes that are offered are not over a total of 25 students in size. • This is good because, the class sizes are not too large so that students may feel left out.

  13. ITCM Classes Table 3: ITCM Fall Class Size

  14. Fall ITCM Class Pareto Chart Figure 3: Size of ITCM Classes

  15. Fall ITCM Classes • The largest class in ITCM is the intro 101 class. • This being a freshman level class, the IET department may want to look into dividing this into two sections. • Freshman students still learning how to get used to college course work, may require more attention.

  16. Why? • The reason we felt it was a good tool of TQM to show the class sizes of these three departments. • There have been many studies that show that students learn better in a smaller class where the teacher can be more focused on less students at a time. • This also shows that the AET department has done a good job of implementing TQM because of smaller numbers in the classes.

  17. TQM at Morehead • We also took a survey from random students to ask what classes they thought should be offered more than once a year, and were extremely important to have at a certain time • The students are going to be remained anonymous

  18. Survey Information • The survey was conducted with 20 people all in different classes. • Each student was asked two questions. Both questions are present in the previous slide. • For the IET section the IET 307 was the class that presented the most response too. All 20 students felt it should be offered more than once in a semester and at two different times for reasons unknown. • Not only for IET 307, but there were other classes that were taken consideration.

  19. Survey Cont. • The ITCD section was torn between ITCD 415 and 315. Both of these classes are similar but are only offered once a year. 16 out of the 20 thought that they should be offered more than once. And 15 out of 20 felt that there should be more than one time for both classes. • The ITCM section showed no problem of a time issue with only 2 out of the 20, and the two just happened to be athletes. There was also no sign of a need for classes needed to be offered more frequently.

  20. Recommendations • The survey that was done with the IET students can also be used as recommendations. • The class sizes that are given in the tables can show how many students are in each course. • Tables and graphs such as these, can be used to keep classes at an appropriate size so that students can get the full learning experience.

  21. Overall TQM at MSU • By looking at the graphs and report of the survey we concluded the following about MSU’s use of Quality management. • They conduct their use of pareto charts very efficiently to see what classes are important enough that needed to be offered. • They also use other measures of TQM to their advantage, since quality in education has become a big issue in the coming days, they do a good job of holding all the faculty and staff accountable.

More Related