CHAPTER 3 Summary of Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations Significant Findings

2. CHAPTER 3 • Summary of Findings, Conclusions and • Recommendations • Significant Findings • Narrowed findings from chapter 2 • Major statements of factual information based on the analyzed data. • Only the major and salient findings are included in this chapter. • All sub-problems must have their respective findings. • The results of the hypothesis must be included. • No numerical data should be included

3. Guidelines on Findings: • 1. Enumeration of findings should follow the sequence of the sub-problems. • 2. Only important major findings should be highlighted. • 3. Findings should be stated as cautiously as possible without further discussion. • 4. Findings must be consistent with the analysis of data. • No new data should be introduced into the findings if they are not found in the analysis of data. • Minimum of one and maximum of three sentences per finding based on sub problem

4. Example on separate sheet

5. Conclusion • This is the part that provides implications based on significant findings • This should be an answer to the conclusion • This could provide prognosis for existing theory/concept or principle or a new one.

6. Guidelines on Conclusion 1. Conclusion should not contain numerals 2. No conclusions should be drawn from the implied effects of the findings. 3. Never repeat the findings in the conclusions section. 4. Conclusions should be formulated concisely and briefly stated but must convey as required in the sub-problems. 5. No conclusions should be made that were not based from the findings.

7. Example on separate sheet

8. Recommendations • Drawn from the findings and conclusions of the study. • They must be feasible to be implemented. • Workable or functional, doable, adaptable and flexible. • They must be specific or general or both. • A suggestion for further study must be included. • .

9. WRITING THE PROPOSED OUTPUT Guidelines: 1. Output should be based on the sub –problem2. It should be the first recommendation3. It should answer or improve the weaknesses of the study4. It should be comprehensive and action oriented.5. It must be SMART6. It is placed in Chapter 2 as last table/part

10. PARTS OF THE OUTPUT • TITLE AND PROPONENT • INTRODUCTION/RATIONALE • GENERAL OBJECTIVES • AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT • SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES • ACTIVITIES AND STRATEGIES • PERSONS INVOLVED • TIME FRAME • MATERIALS AND BUDGET • EXPECTED OUTCOME

11. ABSTRACT This is a short summary of the study presenting the main problem, objectives, methodology and process, major findings, conclusion and major recommendations. It should be 200 words only and should be placed before the rationale in Chapter I.

12. RESEARCH CAPABILITY AMONG HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS IN CEBU CITY: ENHANACEMENT PROGRAM ABSTRACT Keywords: Research Capability; Research Operations; Research in Higher Education Institutions; HEIs Research Capability; Public and Private HEIs; Enhancement Program The study ascertained the research capability of the selected public and private higher education institutions in Cebu City as basis for an enhancement program. Selected public and private HEIs were generally capable in their research functions and undertakings. However, there are critical points that need attention and improvements. Recommendations for improvement include the following: Assistance in the publication of HEI researches in national and international journals; Collaborative research among HEIs for mentoring opportunities; Guidance in formulation of research strategy in individual HEIs; Forge a consortium among HEIs to exchange research resources and expertise and to conduct joint research undertakings; Expanding horizons in terms of funding sources and linkages to government agency, NGO and international agency; and encourage researchers to do not only descriptive research but application research, experimental, program development and historical research that promote Philippine culture.

13. ABSTRACT CHAPTER I – THE PROBLEM AND ITS SCOPE INTRODUCTION Rationale of the Study Review of Related Literature Conceptual Framework THE PROBLEM Conceptual Framework Statement of the Problem Statement of Hypotheses Significance of the Study Scope and Limitation RESEARCH METHODOLOGY Research Design Research Environment Research Respondents Research Instruments Research Procedures Gathering of Data Treatment of Data DEFINITION OF TERMS CHAPTER II – PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA AND PROPOSED OUTPUT CHAPTER III – SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION REFERENCES APPENDICES (Letter, Instruments, Budget, Sample instruments with answer, computation of Stat)

14. Documentary VideoMechanics:1. use captions/text , narration (audio), pictures and actual video2. Strictly 10 minutes maximum

15. Parts1. provide a teaser intro (rationale)depicting the reason of conducting the study (stat, role play, movie clip, actual video)2. state the problems in capsule3. state the methodology in capsule: Design, environment, instruments,

16. 4. present the Chapter 2: strictly present only the grand mean and the interpretations 5. if there is an in depth interview, present a short clip and provide transition

17. 5. Do not include the proposed program in the Docu. 6. State the Conclusion 7. Reminder: In Quanti, the documentary is straight to the point based on findings but should provide the qualitative mood through videos and clips

18. Application: Provide the Significant findings, conclusion and recommendations of the following data

19. Learning Styles and Math Performance of STEM Students • What is the extent of the learning styles of STEM students in the following: • 1.1 Visual • 1.2 Auditory • What is the Math performance of students • What learning style is correlated to the math performance of stem students • (50 points)

20. Using the same data, make a documentary video and slides (200 points quiz)