80 likes | 163 Views
TI2 14/6/08. Elena. Saturday data’s. ["BTV.610018", "BTV.610252","BTV.610317", "BTVI.20506" , "BTVI.24404", "BTVI.24704" , "BTVI.26506", "BTVI.26706"] Removed only: 26606 (troubles), 24604 (I forgot to compute sigmas of that… :- ) But 24404 is considered (2.3m dispersion).
E N D
TI2 14/6/08 Elena
Saturday data’s • ["BTV.610018", "BTV.610252","BTV.610317", "BTVI.20506" , "BTVI.24404", "BTVI.24704" , "BTVI.26506", "BTVI.26706"] • Removed only: 26606 (troubles), 24604 (I forgot to compute sigmas of that… :-\ ) • But 24404 is considered (2.3m dispersion)
Dp/p= from 4D fit is → 0.16-3 • From MRange → about 0.3-3 • Mrange with correction transfer function pick-up + approx cabling → 0.22-3 • Actually I talked w. Thomas Bohl and the mathematica notebook I was using does not give yet the correct calibration (bunch length can be even smaller) because the transfer function of the PU is ok, but the length of the cables is different than what has been assumed → better to go to the Faraday Cage next time, since the MRange gives only qualitative results…
Dp/p from 4D fit Red: from horiz measurements Green: from vertical
Horiz. emittance Red: 4D fit Green: 3D fit (dp/p=0.22-3) Blue: 3D fit (dp/p=0.16e-3) Magenta: 3D fit (dp/p=0.26-3)
Vertical beta Red: 4D fit Green: 3D fit (dp/p=0.22-3) Blue: 3D fit (dp/p=0.16e-3) Magenta: 3D fit (dp/p=0.26-3)
Horizontal beta Red: 4D fit Green: 3D fit (dp/p=0.22-3) Blue: 3D fit (dp/p=0.16e-3) Magenta: 3D fit (dp/p=0.26-3)
Vertical emittance Red: 4D fit Green: 3D fit (dp/p=0.22-3) Blue: 3D fit (dp/p=0.16e-3) Magenta: 3D fit (dp/p=0.26-3)