Transforming Installation Management

1. Transforming Installation Management Institute of Land Warfare Breakfast Forum 6 March 2003 MG Larry Lust Assistant Chief of Staff for Installation Management

2. Topics • Transformation of Installation Management • U.S. Army Installation Long Range Plan • Barracks • Housing • Utilities Privatization

3. Intent of Transformation of Installation Management • Provide corporate structure focused on installation management • Support & Enable Mission Commanders • Eliminate migration of Installation Support dollars (BASOPS, Environment, Family Programs, Base Communications, Sustainment Renovation & Modernization) • Achieve regional efficiencies • Provide consistent and equitable services via “Standard Levels of Service” • Integrate Reserve Components • Support Information Technology and Contracting centralization efforts • MACOM Commanders provide strategic guidance through Installation Management Board of Directors (BOD)

4. Fort Wainwright Ft. Greely Fort Richardson Northwest Northeast Yakima Training Center Fort Lewis Umatilla Chem Depot Fort Drum Natick R & D Ctr Devens RFTA (USAR) USAG Selfridge Watervliet Ars Fort McCoy (USAR) Tobyhanna Army Depot Ft. Hamilton Detroit Ars West Point Picatinny Arsenal Carlisle Barracks Rock Island Arsenal Fort Monmouth Letterkenny AD Aberdeen Proving Ground Fort Dix (USAR) Dugway Proving Ground Lima Army Tank Plt Sierra Army Depot Ft Detrick Deseret Chem Depot Ft. AP Hill Fort Carson Tooele AD Adelphi Lab Ctr Fort Eustis Parks RFTA (USAR) Fort Monroe Hawthorne AD Fort Lee Fort Story Pueblo Depot Riverbank AAP Moffett Field RFTA (USAR) Radford AAP Walter Reed Ft. Meade Blue Grass AD Presidio of Monterey Iowa AAP Fort McNair Fort Myer Fort Hunter Liggett (USAR) Fort Knox Fort Belvoir Lake City AAP Holston AAP Fort Campbell Fort Bragg Fort Riley Fort Irwin Fort Leavenworth MOT Sunny Point Milan AAP Fort Sill Fort Leonard Wood Fort Jackson McAlester AAP White Sands Missile Testing Center Yuma Proving Ground Redstone Arsenal Pine Bluff Ars Red River AD Fort Gordon Kansas AAP Anniston AD Fort Hauchuca Lone Star AAP Director Locations NE: Ft Monroe SE: Ft McPherson NW: Rock Island Ars SW: Ft Sam Houston Europe: Heidelberg Pacific: Ft Shafter Korea: Yongsan Louisiana AAP Fort McPherson Fort Benning Ft. Gillem Fort Bliss Fort Polk Hunter Army Airfield Fort Rucker Fort Hood Fort Stewart Fort Sam Houston Camp Stanley Storage Actv Pacific Mississippi AAP Southeast USAG Miami Corpus Christi AD Ft Buchanan, PR Southwest Tokyo/Yokohama Akizuki/Kure Zama/Sagamihara Okinawa Overseas: Europe Korea Fort Shafter Schofield Barracks Kwajalein Installation Management Regions

5. U.S. Army Installation Long Range Plan OSD Guidance is to fund 100% sustainment Today Goals • C1 Army living and working in C3 conditions • Achieve full sustainment by FY05 • Raise facility quality to C2 by FY10 • Achieve 67 yr recap by FY07 $11.5B Currently 104 years • Focus Facility Types • Veh Maint & Hardstand • Fitness Centers • ARNG Readiness Centers • USAR Centers • Classrooms • Trainee Barracks • Chapels Strategy • Focus investment to raise quality to C2 • Execute Barracks Modernization Program • Execute Army Family Housing Program • Execute Efficiency Programs

6. Barracks Modernization Program Today Target • Required 164,800 permanent party spaces for 141,200 soldiers • 76% of barracks adequate or funded to meet standard • 83% US • 63% Europe • 64% Korea • Meet 1 + 1 or equivalent standard for all barracks by FY08 (funded to 2010 or beyond) 76% 79% 82% 86% 91% 97% 97% 97% Strategy • Assign 2+2 as 1+1 • Build out deficit • Renovate worst first • Centrally fund • furnishings As of FY2004 PresBud

7. Army Family Housing Program Target Today • 38% Army Family Housing adequate • Eliminate inadequate housing by FY07 Privatized inventory increases from 13% to 58% between FY03 –FY09 Strategy • Community First Approach (Increase housing allowance) • Privatize – Residential Communities Initiative (RCI) • Build new • Lease

8. Total Program = 28 Projects (71,418 Homes) Fort Lewis, WA = 3,982 4 Northeast Projects Fort Hamilton, NY = 228 Picatinny Arsenal, NJ = 116 W. Reed AMC, D.C. = 173 Fort Detrick, MD = 155 Fort Drum, NY = 2,272 Carlisle Brks, PA = 316 Fort Meade, MD = 3,170 Fort Leavenworth, KS = 1,580 Presidio of Monterey / Naval Postgraduate School, CA = 2,268 Fort Belvoir, VA = 3,068 Fort Leonard Wood, MO = 2,472 Fort Carson, CO = 2,663 Fort Eustis / Story / Monroe, VA = 1,299 Fort Campbell, KY = 4,807 Fort Bragg, NC = 5,578 Fort Irwin / Moffett / Parks, CA = 3,052 Fort Knox, KY = 3,380 Fort Gordon, GA = 872 Redstone Ars, AL = 503 Fort Benning, GA = 4,055 Fort Rucker, AL = 1,516 Fort Shafter / Schofield, HI = 7,704 Fort Stewart / Hunter, GA = 2,927 Fort Bliss, TX = 2,776 Fort Polk, LA = 3,648 4 Initial Projects Fort Hood, TX = 5,912 Possible Future Locations FY 2002 Projects Fort Huachuca Fort Sill Fort Monmouth Fort Wainwright Fort Richardson Aberdeen Fort Lee West Point Fort Riley Fort Jackson Fort Sam Houston, TX = 926 FY 2003 Projects FY 2004 Projects

9. Utility Privatization Program CONUS 10 Pending Contract Award 79 Under Negotiation Today Goal • CONUS: • 351 systems • 66 privatized • Europe: • 589 systems • 215 privatized • Japan & Korea: • 128 systems exempted • Privatize all systems where economical Strategy • Privatize utilities by 30 Sep 03 where economical • Re-evaluate all systems that are exempt, uneconomical, or had no response by 30 Sep 05 • Bring remaining Army owned systems to C2 condition by 30 Sep 10

10. Summary Actions taken to: • Provide corporate structure focused on installation management • Meet 1 + 1 or equivalent standard for all barracks by FY10 • Eliminate inadequate housing by FY07 • Privatize all systems where economical