1 / 46

A Collaborative Inservice Training Model for Early Development Providers

A Collaborative Inservice Training Model for Early Development Providers. February 20, 2004. Mary Pat Moeller, Ph.D. Boys Town National Research Hospital. Presenting Issues. Geographically challenged state affecting access to services

Download Presentation

A Collaborative Inservice Training Model for Early Development Providers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A Collaborative Inservice Training Model for Early Development Providers February 20, 2004 Mary Pat Moeller, Ph.D. Boys Town National Research Hospital

  2. Presenting Issues • Geographically challenged state affecting access to services • Long-standing history of birth-3 services in public school programs • Limited availability of specialists to work with population of newly-identified D/HH infants • Advances in technology and concomitant need to update expertise • Practice shifts (primary service provider model; services coordination)

  3. Collaborators: • Parent-Infant Team at Boys Town National Research Hospital • Parent-Infant Team at Omaha Hearing School • Part H Program (Co-leads: Dept of Education, Dept of Health & Human Services) • Nebraska Regional Programs for D/HH

  4. Needs Assessment • Surveys and interviews revealed need for:-update on new technologies-strategies for working with families-family support methods-teamwork within primary service provider model-assessment and IFSP development • Most felt “comfortable” with development and communication

  5. Needs: Post Hoc • Specific auditory development stages and strategies • Shifting from child-focus to relationship-focus • Process for determining priorities with families in communication and audition • Process for supporting/guiding families in decision making • Expectations for infants and families

  6. Inservice Program Components

  7. Laying a Foundation Why focus on relationships, not child skill development? Techniques: Lecture & Discussion

  8. Envision “The Potential“ • Two hours/week = 2% of total waking hours for a toddler • Diapering, feeding, playing = each happen at least 2000 times before the first birthday • Just 20 everyday activities would equal 40,000 learning opportunities by age one (Dunst, 2001)

  9. Review Research Findings • McBride & Peterson (1997) observed a child-focused dominance in 160 sessions • Too little focus on parent-child relationship • Mahoney, et al., (1998) – Interventions impact child development to the extent that parents are supported and encouraged to engage in responsive interactions with the child

  10. Consider Outcomes Expectations • When identification is late, families have a “short stay” in the birth-3 program • Parents in this situation did not demonstrate independence or confidence in addressing goals • Implications: Parents benefit from “longer stay” in EICalderon, Bargones & Sidman, 1998

  11. Consider Parental Expectations • Dromi & Ingber (1999) qualitative analysis of parental expectations for intervention (in Israel) Independent Decision-makers (N = 7)Well Socialized (N = 13) Full Collaborators (N=7)Relinquish Responsibility (N = 23) • How do our practices influence perceptions? Does one size fit all? 20 in Partnerships

  12. Avoid Deficit Model -Attachment patterns of H/HH are similar to H/H - Deaf and hearing toddlers equally likely to perceive mothers as sensitive & emotionally responsive -Parents make adaptive & intuitive adjustments -We should not assume the need to focus on negative aspects of interaction Lederberg & Prezbindowski, 2000

  13. Core Values & Beliefs • We are in the home to support care providers in developing competence and confidence in helping the infant learn • Each family is unique & we work to honor this diversity • The family is the expert on the child and the constant in the infant’s life • Families are equal team members

  14. ABC’s of Family-Centered Intervention • Monday: Audition, Babies and Coping with Technology • Tuesday: Assessing Babies A-ZWhat parents want from EI • Wednesday: Signature behaviors for communication and auditionIFSP development • Thursday: Learning and coaching through daily routines • Friday: Cultural competence, partnerships and support for decision making

  15. Beyond Lecture: Skill Building Activities • Hands-on interactive experiences • Expectations-shaping experiences • Videotape analysis • Provision of operating frameworks • Prompted practice • Group brainstorming application

  16. Skill Building Activities (Cont) • Small groups: family case studies • Dialogue with parents/families & strategies for family support • Identifying “tools of trade”

  17. “Hands On“ Interactive Experiences • Small groups rotate to learning stations: -identify problem with hearing aids/earmolds-identify parts of cochlear implant; -administer six sound test-listen to FM system-problem-oriented role play • Resource library – review unfamiliar curriculum and resources; share with group

  18. Expectations Shaping • “Guess the audiogram” game • Simulations of hearing loss • Longitudinal observations of children • Experienced providers sharing challenges and rewards • Program observations

  19. Videotape Analysis • Developmental examples to support learning of hierarchies and evaluation techniques • Longitudinal examples with discussion • Practice identifying target behaviors with “answer key” and “coach”

  20. Early Communicative Functions (Intentions) • Behavioral RegulationUse communication to get others to do what I want or stop doing something-Request object/action-Protest object/action

  21. Early Communicative Functions (Intentions) • Social Interaction-get adult to look at or notice me for affiliation purposes-request social routine-request comfort-call -greet-show off-request permission Heehee..let’s play more

  22. Early Communicative Functions (Intentions) • Joint Attention- “Direct attention to share the focus”- Get the adult to look at or notice- Comment on object/action- Request information (wh? or rising intonation or facial expression) Wow..check that out Look..cool

  23. Provision of Operating Frameworks • Examples: providing a structure for typical progression of a home visit • Providing a model for exploring communication matches

  24. Rubric for a Home Visit Arlene Stredler-Brown, 2004

  25. Sources of Input for Decision Making Family Values & Beliefs Parent to Parent Contact Content Sources Family Resources Family’s Evolving Goals & Needs Community Resources Collaborative Problem Solving Evaluation Findings Program Visits Profession-al input; Role models Sounding Boards

  26. Prompted Practice • Guided practice with language sample analysis & criterion referenced checklists. • Linking developmental observations to ISFP goals. • Using family assessment tools with a partner: checking for “feel” of the tool. • Being a sounding board…parent expresses “X,” we answer “Y.”

  27. Language Sample

  28. Language Sample

  29. Ways to Analyze Samples: • What strengths did you observe? • What objective measures can we make?Complexity (mean length of utterance)39/18 = 2.16 • % intelligible 11/17 = 64% • Mom’s response typesmeaning conveyedturn taking • Language functions • Language means

  30. Goals Related to Improving Speech • L will discriminate and say the differences between words that differ in vowel perception and consonant perception • Parents and professionals will monitor L’s discrimination errors and address as needed • L. will increase speech intelligibility (through strengthening of auditory skills) • Parents will provide a variety of forms of feedback to L (parallel talk, expansions, etc.)

  31. Group Brainstorming Application • Karen Rossi “Signature Behaviors” • Small groups assigned everyday task like diapering the baby • Determine how each signature behavior could be targeted in this natural context • Both communication and auditory behaviors targeted

  32. Small Group Case Studies • Teams from same geographic area work together • Experienced providers join each team • Each group member brings case study to workshop, including areas of challenge • Workshop content applied to case studies; Periods of discussion

  33. Dialogue with Families • Parent panel with diverse representation • Articles and web sites from parent perspectives explored • Small group discussion of resources for family support • Brainstorming additional resources

  34. Avoiding Info Overload! IFSP, EHDI. MDT, dB, LRE, ENT, DSL, AV, BTE, CI, ASL, CS, MCE???…but I’m just a BABY

  35. Tools of the Trade • Identifying key strategies • Taping examples • Observe and label • Discuss application in own setting

  36. Child development Values & culture Potential impact of hearing loss Communication & language development Communication approaches & fluency Amplification and Listening Devices Assistive technology Expectations Specialized Knowledge & Skills Stredler-Brown, Gallegos,Moeller & Pittman, 2004

  37. What is Coaching? • Coaching is a mindset for providing intervention and supports • It shifts the service delivery model from expert-driven to learner-focused • Focuses on supporting the people involved with the child across natural environments • Dynamic exchange of information based on learner’s skills and needs • Reciprocal process –series of conversations focused on mutually agreed outcomes

  38. Coaching • Use an interactive process of observation and reflection in which the coach promotes the learner’s ability to support the child in being and doing… • Learner gains confidence and competence to implement strategies to increase the child’s learning opportunities and participation in daily life • Learner knows when the strategies are successful, can modify & can generalize to new situations and needs • Caregivers and interventionists are the “learners”

  39. Coaching Techniques • Active, supporting listening • News commentator role – provision of objective, descriptive feedback-identifies what both parties are seeing-clarifies what is working-models how observation guides us-helps to pinpoint areas of strength & need

  40. Coaching Techniques • Guided experiments – “I wonder what will happen if we….”-a process of using discovery to figure out what works…what strategies are a “good fit”-partners “try it out” and evaluate

  41. Coaching Techniques • Model or demonstrate a skill, and test it out together • Jointly discover what is typical (can you show me?…How does that work for you?…You don’t typically…) • Recruit and accept parental interpretations, predictions and advice (you don’t think so…?)

  42. Coaching Techniques • Caregiver in the driver’s seat…may take negotiation about roles • Use of synthesizing statements (summarizing, notetaking, commenting on what we are finding out that is important) • Acting as a sounding board

  43. Regional Workshops • Structured as follow up to summer workshop • Based on regional needs assessment • Workshop + case management issues • Offered in regional sites throughout the state • Practical, interactive:-birth to 5 auditory learning -evaluation techniques-IFSP development • Enhanced understanding of learner needs • Ongoing training opportunities essential

  44. Planned: Link newer providers with experienced providers On-site visits with demonstration & technical support Video, email and phone contacts throughout the year Actual: More experienced providers most willing Brainstorming helpful Email resource helpful Limited access to home visits Confidentiality issues Requirement? Mentoring Program

  45. Successes: All parties gained insights that strengthened the system Increased access and capacity in state System of contacts to support service provision Improved training strategies Limitations: Turnover in trained staff (reassignments) Need for creative models for implementing mentoring “Ivory tower” perceptions Modality-related issues Outcomes

  46. Summary • Learners profited from:-Content responsive to needs assessment-Experiential practice -Practical illustration of methods-Clear steps in processes-Learning experiences that shift paradigms & expectations-Follow up tailored to specific needs

More Related