1 / 50

Keywords: High School, PBIS Foundations, Urban Implementation

C8 - PBIS as a Foundational Framework for Implementing School Law Enforcement Programs Brenda Scheuermann, Ph.D. Keywords: High School, PBIS Foundations, Urban Implementation. Objectives. Describe common problems associated with school police programs

armani
Download Presentation

Keywords: High School, PBIS Foundations, Urban Implementation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. C8 - PBIS as a Foundational Framework for Implementing School Law Enforcement ProgramsBrenda Scheuermann, Ph.D. Keywords: High School, PBIS Foundations, Urban Implementation

  2. Objectives • Describe common problems associated with school police programs • Describe how features of universal PBIS are being used as a framework to structure school policing programs in secondary schools • Describe exemplary activities and practices from secondary schools that are implementing the framework.

  3. School Resource Officers • Sworn law enforcement officers with arrest authority • Have specialized training • Assigned to school site full-time • NASRO - SROs have three roles: • law enforcement • teaching • mentoring

  4. 2015-2016, of all US schools: • 56.5% had one or more security staff • 42.9% had sworn law enforcement officer(s) routinely carrying a firearm • Full-time SROs: • Elementary – 13.4% • Secondary – 45.8% • Formal policies about SRO roles: • Elementary – 50.9% • Secondary – 69.6% NCES, Indicators of School Crime & Safety, 2019 update

  5. 1. Describe common problems associated with school police programs

  6. Well-structured School Resource Officer (SRO) and School Security Officer (SSO) programs with clear policies, procedures, roles, and responsibilities seem more likely to achieve positive outcomes (Cray & Weiler, 2011).

  7. Common Problems • Lack of clearly defined roles • SROs called for discipline matters • Lack of systematic communication between SROs and school administration • Lack of goal-directed planning • Lack of systematic, data-based goal planning and monitoring

  8. 2. Describe how features of universal PBIS have been used as a framework to structure school policing programs in secondary schools

  9. PBIS: Tiered Logic Model • Individualized behavior assessment • Multi-disciplinary planning • Wrap-around services Tier 3: Tertiary A FEW Tier 2: Targeted SOME • More frequent reminders • More frequent feedback • Additional instruction • Mentors Tier 1: Universal ALL • Clear, consistent expectations • Teach expected behaviors • Acknowledge • Effective responses for misbehavior • Engaging classroom instruction

  10. PBIS: Organizational practices

  11. A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OFA COMPREHENSIVE, RESEARCH-BASED FRAMEWORK FOR IMPLEMENTING SCHOOL-BASED LAW ENFORCEMENT PROGRAMS • National Institutes of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice Award 2016-CK-BX-0003 • Project purpose: To evaluate a PBIS-based framework for school policing The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Department of Justice.

  12. Research Team

  13. Project Organization • 6 school districts in central Texas • Large and small schools • Suburban and rural districts • 26 secondary schools • Random assignment to treatment or control groups • Treatment schools – support for framework implementation • Control schools – business as usual • Assessing impact across multiple variables

  14. Framework Components

  15. Program Planning Select Committee and Liaison Set Goals, Measures Program Maintenance Officer and Staff Training Analysis and Review Data Collection

  16. 3. Describe exemplary activities and practices from secondary schools that are implementing the framework.

  17. Framework Components

  18. Training, Coaching, and Support

  19. Training

  20. Training, continued

  21. Coaching

  22. Support

  23. Representative Teams

  24. Measurable, Data - Based Goals

  25. Most Common Campus Goals • Law-breaking behaviors • e-cigarettes, drugs • thefts • Rule-breaking behaviors • using locked doors and unauthorized access • students in hallways during class • Perceptions of SRO • by students, teachers, parents, community • Campus security

  26. Data: Goals: Improve students’ perceptions of the SRO by 10% by the end of the 2018/2019 school year. Student perceptions survey: For all grade levels, survey of students taking social studies classes (fall and spring) Decrease alcohol and drug offenses among students by 20 percent by end of school 2018-19 school year from previous school year. Texas (PEIMS) Discipline Data

  27. Decrease thefts across the entire campus by 10% by the end of the school year (2018/19) Student reports of theft • Decrease the number of unlocked lockers by 50% by the end of the 2018/2019 school year. Number of unlocked lockers during random checks by athletic coaches, SRO, and administration.

  28. Activities to Achieve Goals

  29. Activities to achieve goals

  30. Data-Driven Decisions

  31. Project Data School Data Student surveys State-reported discipline data Internal surveys Other goal-specific data

  32. Bullying and Victimization Student Surveys Delinquency • Spring survey of three classes over three project years • 6th graders • 8th graders • 10th graders • 5 categories, 1 – 8 items each • Students respond according to a five-point scale, "0 times" to"4 or more times" Caring Relationships Rule Clarity School Bonding and Safety

  33. Officer Encounters Officers report meaningful encounters during 2 one-week periods in spring

  34. Our evaluation

  35. The next few slides display a few snapshots from the officer encounter data Think about implications of these data for PBIS ?

  36. *percentages do not total 100% as officers were able to select more than one option

  37. Come to tomorrow’s presentation by Dr. Fronius and Officer Lozano! 9:30 – 10:45 Session D-8 Protection Through Prevention: The Role of School Resource Officers Within a PBIS Framework

  38. Next steps

  39. Successes so far

  40. Challenges

  41. How to use this approach in your own district or school

  42. For more information about PBIS, or PBIS applied in alternative settings • Brenda@txstate.edu • PBIS.org

  43. ? ? ? ? Comments or questions? ? ?

  44. Miami, FL Hyatt Regency Miami March 11-14, 2020 For more information, visit: conference.apbs.org

  45. For more information: Brenda Scheuermann Brenda@txstate.edu

More Related