180 likes | 305 Views
Working Group MembershipStephen Horne (Chair)Neil Adams (NSW)Steve Linden (WA)Part of the series of Handbooks supporting the AS8000 suite of Governance Standardsalso see HB 405 Disclosure and Transparency FrameworksLinked with the Corruption Prevention NetworkBig Issue Grappler (decision-supp
E N D
2. Working Group Membership
Stephen Horne (Chair)
Neil Adams (NSW)
Steve Linden (WA)
Part of the series of Handbooks supporting the AS8000 suite of Governance Standards
also see HB 405 Disclosure and Transparency Frameworks
Linked with the Corruption Prevention Network
Big Issue Grappler (decision-support tool)
Developed by Robertson for www.corruptionprevention.net
How did we get here?
3. The call for probity assurance by stakeholders is growing
The use of probity specialists is growing
Probity assurance is an emerging sub-profession, but with variable practice
Probity specialists can be faced with difficult situations and not be able to rely on clear guidance about what is required of the role
NSW Audit Office report on Lease of the Moore Park Showground to Fox Studios, Chapter 8, Probity Audit Issues
Why did we do this?
4. Most government jurisdictions have now put out guidance material (references included), but purpose-built formal Standards are lacking
Generic Auditing Standards are not fully relevant
audit “opinion” or “agreed-upon procedure”?
An emerging sub-profession, not the sole domain of accounting/audit
We think that probity needs to shift from being an add-on to, become a characteristic of decision making Why did we do this?
5. Although we all know that unsound decisions can be a massive problem …..
people feel pressured and rushed
thinking everything through may be seen as a luxury
many people have a tendency to leap to a conclusion or preferred option very early, and then rationalise everything to fit rather than decide based on sound analysis
And we also know that poor process can cause as much aggravation as a unsound decisions, but …
knowledge of “proper process” is often poor
proper process may be seen as expendable and, in the heat of the moment, not really important anyway
Poorly made decisions
6. Proposition:
Any undertaking or decision involving significant risk potentially warrants some level of probity assurance
Why?:
Significant decisions involve significant commitments
Stakeholders must be confident that commitments are made carefully and on their merits alone
Lack of confidence in major decisions undermines performance
Poor decision-making is not uncommon Probity is not an “optional extra”
7. Probity means that decisions are made with integrity, honesty and fairness while observing due-process – in the pursuit of value for money
Addressing probity issues should be a normal part of any significant project or decision process
It does not cause delay or add costs. It generates value from proper reflection & efficient handling
probity should be viewed as a key element of governance, setting the tone for how things are done Probity sets your corporate tone
8. When operative effectively, probity in decision making will facilitate several observable, and highly desirable, conditions:
Value for money
Impartiality
Removal of improper influence arising from conflicts of interest
Accountability and transparency
Confidentiality. Probity is not a vague concept
9. Poor decisions nearly always lack rigor
Expediency is a false economy in major decisions
Establish a governance environment in which it is expected that major and complex decisions use a structured and properly considered process
Reinforce it regularly
Train people in how to do this
Provide decision-support tools Chapter 2– sound decision making processes
10. Improving Probity in Everyday Decision Making
11. Decision support tool
Easily accessible
Confidential
Flexible
Free What is BIG?
12. What BIG does
13. What BIG does not do
14. 7 Steps
15. Some decisions are part of a long and complex chain, or are very complex in other ways
The use of probity specialists can add value by:
assisting decision-makers to:
Set up a good process
Be aware of probity pitfalls
Properly address probity issues as they arise
Providing assurance to stakeholders that the decision making process is fair and reliable Chapter 3 – expert assistance
16. Aspects covered:
the probity specialist (what are they? Types?)
independence of the probity specialist
skills of the probity specialist
confidentiality
conflicts of interest
terms of reference
plans
targeting areas of probity risk
review of documentation
role at briefings, at site visits, at evaluation committee meetings, during contract negotiations, at tenderer debriefings
working papers
probity report
Guidance on Using Probity Specialists
17. Probity in the detail
18. AvailableNow