1 / 8

Preserving Positivity (and other Constraints?) in Released Microdata

Preserving Positivity (and other Constraints?) in Released Microdata. Alan Karr 12/2/05. Problem. O = original microdata Constrained to satisfy o ij >= 0 for all data records i and (some or all) attributes j Want masked data release M that Satisfies same positivity constraints

arnold
Download Presentation

Preserving Positivity (and other Constraints?) in Released Microdata

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Preserving Positivity(and other Constraints?) in Released Microdata Alan Karr 12/2/05

  2. Problem • O = original microdata • Constrained to satisfy oij >= 0 for all data records i and (some or all) attributes j • Want masked data release M that • Satisfies same positivity constraints • Has high utility • Has low disclosure risk

  3. Motivating Example • O = original data • M1 = MicZ applied to O • Conceptually, data have shrunk • D = O – M1 • N = normally distributed noise with • Mean 0 • Cov(N) = Cov(D) • M2 = M1 + N • Works well for utility and risk • Does not preserve positivity

  4. Which Methods Preserve Positivity?

  5. The Problem with Mic*

  6. Some (1/2, ¼, 1/1048576)-Wit Ideas • Transform data to remove constraints (e.g., take logs), do SDL on transformed data, and untransform • Microaggregation becomes “weighted” • How to choose noise distribution? • Use rejection sampling for additive noise • M+N|M+N>= 0 • Does it restore full covariance?

  7. More Ideas • Microaggregation with weights: move points near edges less • May be bad for risk • No longer preserves first moments • Linear transformation, if constraint satisfied (Mi-Ja) • M = {T(x): T(x) >= 0} U {x: T(x) not >=0} • ?????

  8. Other Questions • More complex constraints • x1 <= x2 (time precedence; net income <= gross) • x1 + x2 <= x3 • Are all “convexity-like” constraints alike? • Multiple constraints • Methods need to be scalable • “Soft” constraints

More Related