260 likes | 434 Views
Supersymmetric B-L Extended Standard Model with Right-Handed Neutrino Dark Matter. Nobuchika Okada. University of Alabama Tuscaloosa, AL. In collaboration with Zachary M. Burell (U. of Alabama). Paper in preparation. Miami 2010 @ Fort Lauderdale, Dec. 14-19, 2010.
E N D
Supersymmetric B-L Extended Standard Model with Right-Handed Neutrino Dark Matter Nobuchika Okada University of Alabama Tuscaloosa, AL In collaboration with Zachary M. Burell (U. of Alabama) Paper in preparation Miami 2010 @ Fort Lauderdale, Dec. 14-19, 2010
Problems in Standard Model The Standard Model (SM) is the best theory in describing the nature of elementary particle physics, which is in excellent agreement with almost of all current experimental results However, New Physics beyond SMis strongly suggested by both experimental & theoretical point of view
What is missing in the SM? 1. Neutrino masses and mixings Oscillation data Very small mass scale Large mixing angle
2. Dark Matter Problem Existence of Dark Matter has been established! Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) satellite has established the energy budget of the present Universe with a great accuracy Dark Matter particle: non-baryonic electric charge neutral (quasi) stable No suitable DM candidates in the SM
How to naturally incorporate tiny neutrino masses in the SM? Seesaw Mechanism Effective operator: If the seesaw scale Minkowski; Yanagida; Gell-Mann, Ramond & Slansky; Mohapatra & Senjanovic; others Naturally, The seesaw scale lies in the intermediate scale or lower
Seesaw Mechanism Minkowski; Yanagida; Gell-Mann, Ramond & Slansky; Mohapatra & Senjanovic; others We introduce right-handed neutrinos and Majorana masses Integrating the heavy Majorana neutrino SM singlet fermion
What is the Majoranan mass scale? Broad range of Majorana mass is possible, depending on Dirac mass scale Example: What is the origin of MR? We have added MR by hand
Minimal Gauged B-L Extension of the SM The model is based on • simple extension of the SM we gauge an anomaly-free global (B-L) symmetry in the SM Particle Contents New fermions: New scalar:
gauge anomaly-freeby the presence ofright-handed neutrinosresponsible fortheseesaw mechanism RH neutrino mass via B-L symmetry breaking B-L symmetry breaking via B-L gauge boson (Z’ boson) mass Majorana neutrino mass Mass scale is controlled by B-L Sym. Br. scale What is natural scale for B-L breaking?
DM candidate is still missing There have been many proposal for introduction of DM particles In fact, we do not need to add a new particle for DM physics, instead, we introduce a parity N.O & O. Seto, PRD 82:023507,2010 DM candidate Two right-handed neutrinos are sufficient to fit all the neutrino oscillation data Z2 odd right-handed neutrino can be a good WIMP DM candidate with mass range, O(100 GeV)-(1 TeV), consistent with WMAP data & others
Theoretical Problem in the SM and its extensions Gauge hierarchy problem: (extended) SM with Higgs field(s) suffers from this problem Instability of symmetry breaking scale quadratic divergence of Higgs mass^2 corrections Supersymmetric Extension: promising way to solve the problem No quadratic divergence
SUSY B-L Extended SM Now, we consider SUSY extension of Minimal Gauged B-L SM It is straightforward to extend a model to its SUSY version Superfield formalism Matter & Higgs fields chiral superfields Gauge fields Vector superfields
Particle Content s (SUSY extension) Chiral superfield Chiral superfield:
Superpotential relevant to neutrino physics Because of Z_2 parity, N3 cannot have Dirac Yukawa Superpotential in Higgs sector
Introduction of SUSY breaking terms SUSY should be broken, otherwise Superpartners have mass 100 GeV- 1 TeV We adopt the gravity mediation in our analysis, for simplicity: Universal gaugino masses: Universal sfermion masses: Unversal A-parameter : @ GUT scale
Interesting Features of the Model (A) Radiative B-L symmetry breaking B-L symmetry breaking naturally occurs at TeV scale Z’ boson and RH neutrinos at TeV scale LHC physics (B) R-party violation LSP neutralino is not stable anymore DM candidate is Z_2 odd RH neutrino (C) Relic abundance of RH neutrino Consistent with the observation DM mass is fixed once Z’ mass fixed
(A) Radiative B-L symmetry Breaking In MSSM, EW symmetry is broken via radiative corrections due to interplay between the large top quark Yukawa coupling and SUSY breaking mass terms RGE running of SUSY breaking mass^2 for Higgs and squarks negative @TeV scale
Higgs potential is changing its shape according to energy Low Energy High Energy Symmetric EW symmetry breaking Higgs VEV scale is O(sfermion mass) EW scale
Similar to MSSM happens when Majorana Yukawa is large negative
After potential analysis with , we find For fixed Lower bound on BL scale by LEP experiment > 6 TeV Radiative B-L symmetry breaking TeV Scale!
LHC @ 7 TeV or 14 TeV CTEQ for pdf Z’ peak Z’ peak SM bkg SM bkg
(B) R-parity Violation Fileviez Perez and Spinner, ``The Fate of R-Parity,'' arXiv:1005.4930 [hep-ph] In most of the parameter space, R-party is broken R-party violation Remember….. LSP neutralino is a DM candidate in the MSSM if R-parity is conserved In the present model, R-party is broken and thus, LSP neutralino is not stable any more Note that Z_2 odd RH neutrino is still stable and a good candidate for DM
(C ) Relic Density of Z_2 Odd RH Neutrino DM Annihilation process: Boltzmann equation Z’ Annihilation process is not efficient Need Z’ resonance WMAP data
Summary We have proposed Supersymmetric B-L Extended Standard Model 3 right-handed neutrinos are introduced to make the model free from all gauge & gravitational anomalies Associated with B-L symmetry breaking, right-handed neutrinos acquire masses and Seesaw Mechanism is naturally implemented Raidative B-L symmetry breaking occurs by the interplay between large Majorana Yukawa coupling and SUSY breaking masses B-L symmetry breaking is naturally at TeV scale, so that Z’ boson and right-handed neutrino masses around TeV accessible by LHC R-parity is also broken LSP neutralino is no longer DM candidate Z_2 odd right-handed neutrino is the DM candidate whose relic density is consistent with the observation if