270 likes | 411 Views
Superintendents’ Network Statewide Meeting. Richard Elmore and Liz City April 18, 2012. Being strategic. 3 questions: What, Why , How. . From Strategy in Action , R.E. Curtis and E.A. City, Harvard Education Press, 2009. Learning Goals for Today.
E N D
Superintendents’ Network Statewide Meeting Richard Elmore and Liz City April 18, 2012
Being strategic 3 questions: What, Why, How From Strategy in Action, R.E. Curtis and E.A. City, Harvard Education Press, 2009.
Learning Goals for Today • Understand rounds as a LEARNING practice • Understand how rounds connects strategy and practice on the ground • Understand the diagnostic power of variability • Be able to dig beneath rounds data and use that data to provide developmental feedback on your strategy
Agenda • Framing: Strategy, Rounds, Learning • Artifacts: Symptoms and hypotheses • Break • Digging below the surface: Root cause analysis • Lunch • A developmental framework for schools • Break • Network time: Applying learning from the day • Wrap up: Commit to a question
Strategy Warm-Up • 1 min.: Prepare to describe your system’s strategy for ensuring that every learner fulfills her/his potential • Find someone from another district whom you don’t know well; introduce yourself • 1 min.: Each of you describes your system’s strategy. Your partner’s responsibility is to ask one clarifying question. (~30 seconds each) • Find another person you don’t know well and repeat • Rejoin your team. Repeat in triads.
Strategy—What? Stacey Childress’s definition: “The set of actions an organization chooses to pursue in order to achieve its objectives. These deliberate actions are puzzle pieces that fit together to create a clear picture of how the people, activities, and resources of an organization can work effectively to accomplish a collective purpose.” --quoted in Strategy in Action, p. 3
Strategy—What? In your own words How would you define strategy in your own words? Write a definition Placing bets
Strategy--Why? Forces us to prioritize and make choices about what to do and not do Allows us to marshal resources Focuses the system’s work and reduces “noise” Helps the system move from where it is today to the audacious vision you have for children
What good strategy is: • A few, key carefully considered things to focus the system’s work on that, when put together, create a powerful engine for systemic improvement • A series of well-informed, well-educated bets • It addresses the instructional core • It balances problem solving with pursuing a vision • It is developed in partnership; many people feel a sense of ownership of it—you can ask anyone in the system, and they’ll tell you what it is • It evolves based on progress made, results, and learning • If you can’t see it in the classroom, it’s not there
What good strategy is not: • Everything the system does • Everything everyone wants the system to do • A sure thing • Something static • A piece of paper, brochure, wall chart
How does rounds connect to strategy? • Learning • Students learn best when. . . • Teachers learn best when. . . • Leaders learn best when. . . • Every strategy has an implicit learning theory • Rounds exposes that theory to inquiry and learning • The best strategies improve over time
http://gk.oeghd.at/grako14/resources/Norman_l1.pdfhttps://videos.med.wisc.edu/videos/8100http://gk.oeghd.at/grako14/resources/Norman_l1.pdfhttps://videos.med.wisc.edu/videos/8100 Geoff Norman
Artifacts • Take out your rounds artifacts • What do you see? • What’s the emerging evidence of what’s happening in your system? • What are your hypotheses about what’s causing what you see in classrooms?
Symptoms and Hypotheses • Symptom: Low-level tasks • Hypotheses: • Easy to grade • How people were trained • What’s in the book • Helps kids feel good • Success on stand tests • Quieter is better • Teachers have answers to tasks • No time for conversation about tasks • Loss of control when tasks change • Control of class • Learning is predictable • No reason to change • Prior training
No time for conversation about tasksfive whys • Not a priority • Too much content to cover • We haven’t said what is important • Lack of agreement • Action: What will we do to reach agreement? • Issues of control?
Lack of Agreement? • Different philosophies about teaching and learning • Different expectations for student learning • Haven’t taken the time to establish agreement • Avoidance behavior? • This too shall pass; learned helplessness
Low-Level Tasks—Why? • Teachers have answers to tasks • No time for conversation about tasks • Loss of control when tasks change
Root cause analysis: 5 Whys Hypothesis: WHY? Why? Why? Why? Why? Why?
So what? • Symptom: • Hypothesis: • . . . Why? • So what for rounds? . . . • So what for strategy? . . .
A Developmental Perspective on Rounds and School Improvement • How do you choose to focus your use of rounds for maximum impact on improvement of learning? • How do you accommodate to important differences among schools– in rounds? in support? • How do you use rounds to make binding commitments to the next level of work?
Key Assumptions • Every school is different, but the overall strategy applies to all schools • Improvement is growth– growth is a process, not an event • Development occurs on multiple dimensions over time • Tailored solutions to specific problems
Break www.serpinstitute.org Victoria: “performance and development culture” in Victoria Department of Education
Network Time Given your artifacts and your data from rounds, consider: • What are the connections between rounds and strategy? • What are the missing pieces and big holes? • What’s the next level of work for our network? Hint: Your theory of action and data from rounds should be helpful here. You may want to revise your theory of action based on your conversation.
Wrap-up • Based on your learning today, what’s one question your network will commit to investigating?