250 likes | 378 Views
Transverse Momentum Spectra of Identified Hadrons in s = 130 GeV Au-Au Collisions. J. Burward-Hoy Department of Physics and Astronomy, University at Stony Brook, New York for the PHENIX Collaboration Outline of Topics Motivation Identifying , K , p in PHENIX
E N D
Transverse Momentum Spectra of Identified Hadrons in s = 130 GeV Au-Au Collisions • J. Burward-Hoy • Department of Physics and Astronomy, University at Stony Brook, New York • for the PHENIX Collaboration • Outline of Topics • Motivation • Identifying , K, p in PHENIX • Single Particle Pt spectra • Radial flow • hydrodynamics-based parameterization • Discussion and conclusion The PHENIX Experiment J. Burward-Hoy
Motivation RHIC: Ecm = 130 GeV Au on Au collisions • low pt: soft processes • multiple hadronic rescattering • hydrodynamic behavior , K, p, anti-p carry most of energy collectively flow at t decouple at Tfo • high pt: hard processes • hard scattering, jets • pQCD The PHENIX Experiment J. Burward-Hoy
Detecting , K, p in PHENIX r z ~ q/p y r 0 x DC main bend plane DC resolution p/p ~ 1% 3.5% p TOF resolution 115 ps pt = p sin(0) PC1 and Event vertex polar angle The PHENIX Experiment J. Burward-Hoy
Corrections to the Raw Spectra Used MC single particles and track embedding to correct for Tracking inefficiencies and momentum resolution Geometrical acceptance Decays in flight (’s and K’s) Correction is p and PID dependent Particle Acceptance 0.2 GeV/c -0.35 < < 0.35 The PHENIX Experiment J. Burward-Hoy
pt Spectra of Identified Hadrons The PHENIX Experiment J. Burward-Hoy
HIJING K p pt (GeV/c) Protons Cross the Pions? p crosses p crosses K The PHENIX Experiment J. Burward-Hoy
Centrality selected pt spectra. . . The PHENIX Experiment J. Burward-Hoy
<pt> Across Participant Number The PHENIX Experiment J. Burward-Hoy
In the range mt - m0 < 1 GeV, fit and extract the inverse slope Teff Identified particle mt-m0 Spectra If static thermal source, then spectra are parallel The PHENIX Experiment J. Burward-Hoy
HIJING Effective Temperature and HIJING No radial flow in HIJING HIJING To measure the expansion parameters, use hydrodynamics-based parameterization. . . The PHENIX Experiment J. Burward-Hoy
parameters normalization A freeze-out temperature Tfo surface velocity t 1/mt dN/dmt A Tfo t() mt f() 1 Hydrodynamics-based parameterization 1/mt dN/dmt = A f() d mT K1( mT /Tfo cosh ) I0( pT /Tfo sinh ) t integration variable radius r = r/R definite integral from 0 to 1 particle density distribution f() ~ const linear velocity profile t() = t surf. velocity t ave. velocity <t > = 2/3 t boost () = atanh( t() ) minimize contributions from hard processes fit mt-m0<1 GeV The PHENIX Experiment J. Burward-Hoy
PHENIX Preliminary PHENIX Preliminary 5% central data Tfo ~ 104 21 MeV t ~ 0.7 0.1 < t > ~ 0.5 0.1 Systematic errors estimated ~8% in Tfo ~5% in t Arrows indicate upper pt in fit PHENIX Preliminary The PHENIX Experiment J. Burward-Hoy
PHENIX Preliminary PHENIX Preliminary 3 2/NDF 102 2 10 1 1 Parameter Space: 2 Contours of -K-p 5% central The PHENIX Experiment J. Burward-Hoy
Overlap Region in Parameter Space 2 contour overlap Tfo ~ 125 - 83 MeV ~ 104 MeV t ~ 0.6 - 0.8 ~ 0.7 < t> ~ 0.4 - 0.6 ~ 0.5 CERN Pb-Pb NA49: T ~ 132 - 108 MeV ~ 120 MeV t ~ 0.43 - 0.67 ~ 0.55 Systematic errors estimated ~8% Tfo ~5% t The PHENIX Experiment J. Burward-Hoy
The H2H Model Comparison (Hydro 2 Hadrons)D. Teaney, E. Shuryak, et. al. flowing hadronic fluid AND particle cascade uses Hydrodynamics + Relativistic Quantum Molecular Dynamics (RQMD) cascade more constrained predictive power no scaling of nucleons to match data 0 ~ 16.75 GeV/fm30 ~ 1.0 fm/c p/p ~ 0.5 <0> ~ 10.95 GeV/fm3 , K Tfo ~ 135 MeV <t > ~ 0.55 nucleons ~ 120 MeV <t > ~ 0.6 5% central NOTE: includes weak decays The PHENIX Experiment J. Burward-Hoy
Conclusions • Fully normalized, centrality selected , K, p/pbar spectra in 130 GeV Au-Au collisions are measured in PHENIX (Summer 2000 runs) significant p and pbar contribution to hadron spectra starting at ~ 2 GeV/c STAR and PHENIX pbar consistent • Both Teff and <pt> depend on Npart. Teff depends on m0 for 5% central and minimum bias events. There seems to be less of a dependence in the 60 - 92% centrality. • The data suggest sizeable radial flow at RHIC A simple model that assumes hydrodynamic behavior is fit simultaneously to the 5% central data. Good 2 fits for a finite range of anti-correlated parameters Tfo ~ 125 - 83 MeV (~ 8% syst.) t ~ 0.6 - 0.8 ( ~ 5% syst.) < t> ~ 0.4 - 0.6 • In comparison to NA49: Tfo ~ 132 - 108 MeV t ~ 0.43 - 0.67 • H2H model (D. Teaney, E. Shuryak, et. al) , K: Tfo ~ 135 MeV <t >~ 0.55 nucleons: Tfo ~ 120 MeV <t >~ 0.6 • Reduce 20% systematic uncertainty in overall normalization. The PHENIX Experiment J. Burward-Hoy
The mass-squared width: how particle identification is done. momentum p pathlength L m = p/ where = L/ct time-of-flight t |mmeas2 - mcent2| < 2m22 Momentum resolution Time-of-Flight resolution H. Hamagaki The PHENIX Experiment J. Burward-Hoy
25-30% Centrality Collisions Participants 20-25% 0-5% 945 15% 347 15% 15-20% 10-15% 5-15% 673 15% 271 15% 5-10% 15-30% 383 15% 178 15% 0-5% 30-60% 123 15% 76 15% 60-80% 19 60% 19 60% 80-92% 3.7 60% 5 60% Event centrality: how “head-on” is the collision? The fraction of energy deposited in the Zero-degree Calorimeters. A. Denisov The fraction of counts in the Beam-beam Counters. The PHENIX Experiment J. Burward-Hoy
D. Teaney + + p H2H ModelThe Effect of Weak Decays K0s + + - - + p The measured contribution to nucleon spectra from such “real” background is forthcoming. The PHENIX Experiment J. Burward-Hoy
(No QGP phase transition) t() 20 fm/c 2 fm/c 5 fm/c From Hydrodynamics:Radial Flow Velocity Profiles Velocity profile at ~ 20 fm/c “freeze-out” hypersurface At each “snapshot” in time during the expansion, there is a distribution of velocities that vary with the radial position r Plot courtesy of P. Kolb The PHENIX Experiment J. Burward-Hoy
Centrality Positive Negative Tfo <t> Tfo <t> min. bias 16112 0.390.07 15115 0.410.07 5% 15913 0.390.07 14917 0.460.1 60-92% 14312 0.280.1 13416 0.280.1 Effective Temperature and Linear Fit Teff = Tfo + m0 <t>2 5% central Tfo ~ 132 - 166 MeV <t> ~ 0.4 - 0.6 Systematic errors included Compared to hydrodynamics-based parameterization: Tfo within 30% and <t> within 6% The PHENIX Experiment J. Burward-Hoy
2 (Tfo,t) Contours PHENIX Preliminary PHENIX Preliminary positive negative PHENIX Preliminary PHENIX Preliminary K PHENIX Preliminary PHENIX Preliminary p The PHENIX Experiment J. Burward-Hoy
The PHENIX Detector -0.35 < < 0.35 4.5M min. bias events The PHENIX Experiment J. Burward-Hoy
Relevant CERN SPS Observables Teff = Tfo + m<t>2 Teff depends on m0 radial flow Tfo A + A p + A < t> • Bjorken’s formula: • initial energy density • <0> ~ 1/R20 dEt/dy • <0> ~ 3 GeV/fm3 (NA49) System Size = A1 A2 The PHENIX Experiment J. Burward-Hoy
CERN SPSHydrodynamics-Based Parameterization The spectra are well described using hydrodynamic assumptions. CERN Pb-Pb NA49: T ~ 132 - 108 MeV ~ 120 MeV t ~ 0.43 - 0.67 ~ 0.55 The PHENIX Experiment J. Burward-Hoy