100 likes | 205 Views
HIV Criminalization Law in Iowa. Tina Hillman English 250, Section VC November 7, 2012. What exactly is an HIV criminalization law?. Disclosing HIV + status to sexual partner(s ) AIDS epidemic of 1980s: Ryan White CARE Act Thirty-four states, including Iowa. Iowan Statistics.
E N D
HIV Criminalization Law in Iowa Tina Hillman English 250, Section VC November 7, 2012
What exactly is an HIV criminalization law? • Disclosing HIV+ status to sexual partner(s) • AIDS epidemic of 1980s: Ryan White CARE Act • Thirty-four states, including Iowa
Iowan Statistics • Law enacted in 1998 • Class B felony • Forefront leader in pursuing HIV criminalization cases (2nd behind Tennessee) • 37 Iowans have been charged with criminal transmission of HIV; 22 individuals were convicted and sent to prison
Is this law necessary? Scott Burns, an executive director of the National District Attorney’s Association: “If someone with HIV has unprotected sex with somebody who does not, and doesn't reveal that or doesn't disclose that and the other person becomes HIV-positive, I think that's unconscionable.”
Protecting the people: an argument for keeping the law • Objective: to protect the public from those who may abuse their condition and intentionally cause harm to others by not disclosing, or even lying about, their HIV status • Nushawn Williams
A counter-productive law: an argument to end the discrimination • cases of intentional transmissions are very rare • “decades out of date” • “counterproductive, discriminatory, and contributing to further stigmatization of people with HIV” • discourage people from being tested for HIV • “he said/she said” in court cases
Middle ground? • Both sides agree that intentional transmission of HIV is wrong • Same goal, different means and methods to achieving that end goal • Pros: keeping dangerous murderers off the street and discouraging risky sexual behavior • Cons: unfairly charges people already suffering with the “medical, psychological, social and financial ramifications” of HIV
A new law is needed • the act of transmission must prove to be intentional • biting and spitting cannot be used against someone with HIV, because this does not actually transmit the disease • criminal transmission no longer includes kissing as part of its definition of “sexual contact” • the usage of barrier contraceptives such as condoms exempts someone from being prosecuted • consideration of viral load – the amount of the virus in the body – is necessary before prosecution • prosecution occurs only if the disease is actually transmitted
Works Cited • Gardenhire, Ramon. "How Illinois' HIV Criminalization Law Has Changed." AIDS Chicago. 27 July 2012.Web. 02 Nov. 2012. • Merrell, Jim. "Iowa Activists Advance in Push to Repeal HIV Criminalization Law."Prevention Justice. 27 Sept. 2012. Web. 01 Nov. 2012. • Moon, Lindsey. "Critics Address Flaws in Iowa's HIV Criminalization Law." The Daily Iowan. 09 Feb. 2012. Web. 31 Oct. 2012. • Pena, Layla. "Law Criminalizing HIV Transmission Imprisons Iowans Even If Virus Is Not Transmitted." The Iowa Center for Public Affairs Journalism. 29 Nov. 2011. Web. 03 Nov. 2012.
Works Cited (cont.) • "The History of HIV & AIDS: United States of America." AVERT: AVERTingHIV and AIDS. Web. 04 Nov. 2012 • Young, Saundra. "Imprisoned Over HIV: One Man's Story." CNN. 03 Aug. 2012. Web. 01 Nov. 2012. • http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc6/c0.0.403.403/p403x403/224542_410126472387731_969402304_n.jpg • http://www.ippfwhr.org/sites/default/files/imagecache/resource_main_imge/blog-wad2.jpg • http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/features/jamestown0601.htm • http://singhoe.blogspot.com/2011/06/compromise.html