230 likes | 378 Views
The Use of Long Term Monitoring Data in a Decision Support System Kevin James Plant Ecologist Heartland I&M Network. Vital Signs Data Life Cycle . Effective communication of results to park managers. Summary of analysis, reporting. Data analysis. Data processing, QA/QC.
E N D
The Use of Long Term Monitoring Data in a Decision Support System Kevin James Plant Ecologist Heartland I&M Network
Vital Signs Data Life Cycle Effective communication of results to park managers Summary of analysis, reporting Data analysis Data processing, QA/QC Observations / measurements taken Project research and design
Decision Support System • Knowledge base • Logic model • Logical network of information • Logic model engine • Inference engine • Evaluates the logical network • Evaluation results • Tabular/graphical • Spatially explicit
Knowledge Base • Meta-database • formal logical representation of how to evaluate information • Relationship of interrelated topics • Mental map • Graphic design (modularity) • Diverse topics can be analyzed together
Application Framework Logic Model Result Tables Attributes Knowledge Base Logic Model Engine EMDS (GIS) Project Environment writes read read/write uses EMDS 3.1 Extension ArcGIS
EMDS Development History Ecosystem Management Decision Support January 1994 Initial analysis phase of system development January 1995 Initial design specifications completed March 1997 Release of Version 1.0 September 1997 Beta release of Version 2.0 February 1998 Release of Version 2.0 April 2002 Beta release of Version 3.0 January 2003 Release of Version 3.0 Version 3.0 User Guide (USDA Forest Service GTR, 112 pages)
EMDS Resources and Support ArcGIS Extension www.institute.redlands.edu/emds Current Version: 3.1 for ArcGIS 9.1 Beta 3.2 for ArcGIS 9.2 Version 4.0 in development
NPS Monitoring Program Development and Organization – I&M Networks
Heartland Network Natural Resource Monitoring Program Grassland community Diversity Composition Structure Grassland exotic plants
Goal Evaluation • Current vital signs monitoring data • 2006 vegetation monitoring data • Evaluation parameters are derived from: • Baseline conditions • monitoring data 1998 - 2005 • Management plans • Vegetation Management Plan goals ≤ 5% foliar cover of woody species • Desired future conditions
Evaluation of management goal:Prairie community has been restored
Composite Vital Signs Evaluation Prairie community Prairie diversity Prairie composition Prairie structure Prairie exotics
Exotic species do not restrict the functioning of the prairie
Where to go now… • Expand to other vital signs monitoring: aquatic, bird communities, climate • Continued development of park management goals • Refinement of evaluation parameters • Adaptive management and planning